ElanSubdued -> RE: Expectations of Male Submissives (4/27/2008 12:00:39 PM)
|
Stephan, quote:
So there was another thread here where a male submissive was clear about stating he wanted very specific things, and was told repeatedly that it'd probably be a long time before he'd have them met, because it wasn't supposed to be about what he wanted. (snip) Obviously, there's greater competition amongst male submissives for female dominants; yet how does stating preferences for a certain kind of situation make a male any less submissive, for stating those preferences? I snipped the middle for brevity, however, my intent is to address your entire OP. Hmmm. Let's deal with the last paragraph first. I disagree with the notion that there is greater competition between male submissives for female dominants, or rather, to put this another way, that female dominants have their pick of the litter. (In this case, by "litter" I mean pick of the pups. Actually, if you use the *other* definition of the word litter, this may actually be true!) For starters, both partner choose one another. It's not the case that a Domina choose solely on her own, without consent from her partner or partners. More to the point though is that finding quality, compatible, kinky partners isn't easy. I know quite a few Dominas who are single and this is because they cannot find a compatible submissive. Of course, if they want to go on a date with just any wanker, well, sure, they can do this any time, but so (too) can vanilla women. From a male submissive's perspective, I can tell you that Dominas who I would consider having a long-term, romantic relationship with are not easy to find. They are not plentiful. Thus, for those looking for such a relationship, it's not a supply and demand issue of understocked Dominas and overstocked submissives. So there you go. One myth debunked already. :-) Regarding stating preferences making one any more or less submissive, I don't believe this has anything to do with how submissive a person is. Preferences are preferences and all people have them. This said, I do believe that one's approach and timing in stating their tastes can radically effect how this is received. Many *people* (not just submissives) make the mistake of advertising with a big laundry list of "I want A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc.). Just in itself, wading through such a list is generally a turn-off, regardless of the content. And, if the content is entirely self-focused on "I want", this feels even more like the author has many expectations, which is again a turn-off. Certainly, if there are things that are very important (for example, you're looking for a partner who wishes to bare children), these are probably good things to state, but I do think it's better to keep this kind of thing to a minimum, especially in an introduction (which is essentially what a dating profile is). Moving up to your first paragraph now... (*smiles* I'm doing this from bottom to top) I don't see anything wrong with stating what you want and what you're looking for. But, I'll add, from my own experience and feelings: the more specific someone is in their dating criteria, the fewer and fewer people there are that will meet (or want) that criteria. Thus, I think it's important to be honest and to search for your heart's desires, but also courteous and flexible. As in much of the rest of life, the easier and more endearing you are to get along with, the more opportunities arise. Thanks for this interesting post Stephan. It caused me to think a bit and that's always a good thing. :-) Elan.
|
|
|
|