Stephann
Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006 From: Portland, OR Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: gypsygrl quote:
Makes me feel safer and more nurtured than I ever have in my life... I'm not sure why this led me along the specific tangent it did, but when I read it I thought that even if the Master didn't do a lot of direct nurturing---the sort of stuff you decribe in your post--I think for a slave, just being in a specific relationship could be a form of nurturing if it provided what the slave needed. I mean, its hard for me to imagine a Master not doing some form of nurturing, either direct or indirect, if the relationship is worth having. Even if the only reason the Master is doing it is to keep the slave coming back (see HappyPervert's comment) it would seem that some nurturing is inevitable. I'm pretty close to concluding that Masters have to do some form of nurturing otherwise there'd be no relationship. lol Hi there. I think your opening post was a straw man. I suspect you held this conclusion when you started the thread, which is fine. The problem is that you're using the overwhelming statements that "A Master can TOO be nurturing" to support your belief that a Master must, in fact, be nurturing to be a good Master. This may hold true for you; it certainly won't hold true for everyone. Personally, I have a nature that is (possibly) too nurturing. I often fixate on trying to make my partner feel better, happier, and healthier to my own detriment. I have to regularly look at myself, and say "it's ok to do what you want, how you want, too!" Sounds strange coming from a dominant? Yet when we become emotionally invested in the things we care for, we often end up in situations where we do things that are unhealthy to us to comfort others (staying up all night caring for a sick pet for example, when you have work in the morning.) Stephan
_____________________________
Nosce Te Ipsum "The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer Men: Find a Woman here
|