Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Shaping and Molding


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Shaping and Molding Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 10:09:45 AM   
DominantJenny


Posts: 645
Joined: 4/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

A friend and I were discussing this last night, and what I find interesting is that we were discussing the same process, but using different terms for it.  I prefer guiding/encouraging/supporting; my friend leans towards molding/shaping/training.  In what WE were discussing as it applies to me, the end result is the same, we were just using different words to describe the same process.  So it occurred to me later... if someone that I was involved with knows certain words have negative connotations to me, even though I know they view those words differently, then if they choose to use them, they do so knowing that deep down inside it makes me feel that I am not good enough for them.  And that is their choice.

Kind of like saying "you're a slutty bitch" or "you're MY slutty bitch."  Use the first phrase if you like, but know that it makes me feel cold and distant and will yank me out of good headspace in a nanosecond.

Oh yeah... and I'm with mist on the bewbage thing.

Cali


Since I spoke on the "molding and shaping" side of things, I want to point out that these aren't terms I've ever used myself, although I would (until now) have thought nothing of saying "of course I do" if asked. I generally use "guide" myself.
I think a lesson that can be taken away from the discussion is not to automatically condemn someone for using a certain phrase or term, because very few of them have the exact same meaning between any two people, as well as to be aware that a term you use and think harmless (or even are quite attached to) might really set off someone else's negative buttons.
You know, maybe THIS is one of those things that doesn't get said enough to newbies...

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 10:20:07 AM   
happypervert


Posts: 2203
Joined: 5/11/2004
From: Scranton, PA
Status: offline
I think a lot of the confusion comes from notions of shaping and molding being vague and meaning different things to different people. From the discussion here I can see a few different areas that may apply:
  1. behaviors -- do x because the dominant likes it, like training a dog to sit up
  2. learn new skills -- say, take a cooking class to please the dominant
  3. enhancing characteristics that already exist -- the rose metaphore
  4. changing existing characteristics or attitudes because the dominant wants to make you into something else -- Pygmalion
  5. changing existing characteristics or attitudes because the submissive wants change -- i.e. Help me have more self-confidence
The negative reaction seems to come from folks assuming the only definition is #4 because it implies destroying the submissive to remake them. However, the other categories can be beneficial so there should be incentive for submissives expect if not seek them out.

Unfortuantely, there are so many kooks and dopes claiming they want to use their domly power to shape a submissive that it is probably a safe bet they have #4 in mind instead of the other choices. I have found myself doing some of #5 as a relationship evolved and it was a very rewarding experience for both of us, but it isn't something I'd advertize wanting to do -- it just kinda worked out that way.




_____________________________

"Get a bicycle. You will not regret it if you live." . . . Mark Twain

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 12:33:29 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

A friend and I were discussing this last night, and what I find interesting is that we were discussing the same process, but using different terms for it.  I prefer guiding/encouraging/supporting; my friend leans towards molding/shaping/training.  In what WE were discussing as it applies to me, the end result is the same, we were just using different words to describe the same process.  So it occurred to me later... if someone that I was involved with knows certain words have negative connotations to me, even though I know they view those words differently, then if they choose to use them, they do so knowing that deep down inside it makes me feel that I am not good enough for them.  And that is their choice.

Kind of like saying "you're a slutty bitch" or "you're MY slutty bitch."  Use the first phrase if you like, but know that it makes me feel cold and distant and will yank me out of good headspace in a nanosecond.

Oh yeah... and I'm with mist on the bewbage thing.

Cali



But in referring to the section above that I have made bold, couldn't the argument be made that at that point...where the dominant defers to the submissive in his choice of words, even though you KNOW---through communication--- what he means by them when he says them is NOT what you perceive when you hear them...that a portion of the D/s dynamic is being dictated and controlled by the submissive?  Should the dominant insist that his feelings be taken into consideration and that when you speak to him/her about their guidance/nurturance/support of you that you now use the words training/shaping/molding because---like you--- hearing the words he prefers builds up his feelings of self-worth?  Or would it just be better for communication to occur and, if it is not an issue of self-esteem or destruction of the inner psyche but rather a matter of personal irritation and grating, to compromise?  Perhaps, on his part, to understand what it does to his submissive and bear those feelings in mind while still retaining the agreed-to right to listen and still do as he sees fit.  Perhaps, on her part, to understand that not everything submitted to is going to go her way, including the use of certain terminology and to remember that she agreed to submit to a dominant that takes her feelings into account and sometimes acts according to what she wants and sometimes, does not.
In any D/s dynamic, unless it has been negotiated and agreed to that the dominant will have complete control over every aspect of the submissive's life, there are those areas in which the submissive chooses to retain control...be it her ums, her finances, her career, what-have-you.  And I can see where a submissive can feel that one word...the word "my" in the example italicized above...can change a statement from something degrading and indicative of the dominant's assessment of your worth to something that works as an example of endearment or, to those who go further, endearing and sexually erotic humilation.  But let's be honest:  that phrase touches on more than a specific term and on more than irritation.  It touches on self-esteem and, for some, their own moral code and the need for the dominant to be careful in his speech in an area such as this makes sense.  I am not saying that the idea of shaping and molding cannot do the same thing...witness some submissive's responses herein that makes it quite clear that it touches on an area of their psyche that, despite what is explained to them as the meaning of the words, makes them feel as if they are not worthy.  But some have also noted that their initial reaction is akin to something along the lines of "I am not a dog who needs to be trained";  it is more of an irritant than anything else.  But to take it to the point where "correct speech", as defined by the submissive, must be brought into the dominant's consideration each time the dominant chooses to say something?

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 1:59:07 PM   
Prinsexx


Posts: 4584
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner4SexSlave

I'm proud I took a "fixer upper" and where she is today and how things have turned out for her 4 UM's,

In the start, she was taking prozac, was working a dead end factory job, was living in the bad part of town, had low self esteem, not much confidence, and many other things.

She's no longer on prozac, graduated from college with Honors, Is working out in the field helping people in need, Living in a different area, has great self esteem and confidence, Hell she even stopped smoking, so many other things.   3 of her UM's graduated from school now, off to college with scholarships and whatnot..

What the Hell is really so bad about a "Fixer Upper"...? 

It's 'bad' if you take the credit for those achievements. She did those things. We none of us can say if we achieved things BECAUSE we were in partnership or whether we would have achieved them anyway, or if we would have achieved them in partnership with someone else.
I'm sorry if I read you wrong, but I had a mother who used to say; I'm so proud of her as if SHE had done my degree etc. I have had a ex husband who was quoted as saying: When I met her she was living in a hovel.....
I have had an ex partner who said: When I met her she was on medication.....ARRGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHH.  By all means, if as a Dom one feels the need to shape and mold and chamge a submissive, then by all means as it's a free world. However, please don't take credit for the sub's achievement.



_____________________________

Owner of asterion

Metawhore.... the sound of a metaphore when gagged
Free woman
Resident thread finisher
To my stalker:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LN2lP_7J7GI&feature=fvwrel

(in reply to Owner4SexSlave)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 2:04:34 PM   
Prinsexx


Posts: 4584
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

.  In short, taking someone as a "fixer-upper" and trying to make them "better".

I want the most perfect rose I can mold and shape. ........... applying experience, dedication, and lots of hard work.


I am sorry Michael but I don't see the difference. I see you justifying your own method of 'fixing-up'.


_____________________________

Owner of asterion

Metawhore.... the sound of a metaphore when gagged
Free woman
Resident thread finisher
To my stalker:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LN2lP_7J7GI&feature=fvwrel

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 2:41:07 PM   
MadRabbit


Posts: 3460
Joined: 8/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Prinsexx

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

.  In short, taking someone as a "fixer-upper" and trying to make them "better".

I want the most perfect rose I can mold and shape. ........... applying experience, dedication, and lots of hard work.


I am sorry Michael but I don't see the difference. I see you justifying your own method of 'fixing-up'.



There is a world of difference between "fixing up" or improving the value of an individual because they aren't good enough and "molding and shaping" the behaviors of an individual to a Dominants preferences.

Scenario 1 : I buy a Chevy and say "Wow, this is the ugliest and worst car ever and not anything like I want" I proceed to rip apart and replace the engine, change the body work, and give it a new paint job and the end result is I have the Ferrari I really wanted and don't have a Chevy anymore.

Scenario 2 : I buy a Chevy and say "Wow, this is the perfect car for me. I always wanted a Chevy.". I then proceed to readjust the positions of the seat to make me comfortable, put some dice on the rearview mirror, and maybe put in a different CD player. The Chevy is still a Chevy and I am and always was happy with it being a Chevy, but now it's MY Chevy.

If my girl is a Chevy, I am going to be happy with her being a Chevy, but I really want a Ferrari, then I am going to find a Ferrari and tell her she needs to find someone who can appreciate a Chevy. But whether or not it's a Chevy or a Ferrari, I am going to "shape and mold" them into MY Chevy and MY Ferrari.

< Message edited by MadRabbit -- 5/21/2008 2:43:17 PM >


_____________________________

Advice for New Dominants
The Unpolitically Correct Lifestyle Definitions

Obama is NOT the Messiah! He's just a VERY NAUGHTY BOY

(in reply to Prinsexx)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 2:41:22 PM   
Owner4SexSlave


Posts: 1311
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Prinsexx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner4SexSlave

I'm proud I took a "fixer upper" and where she is today and how things have turned out for her 4 UM's,

In the start, she was taking prozac, was working a dead end factory job, was living in the bad part of town, had low self esteem, not much confidence, and many other things.

She's no longer on prozac, graduated from college with Honors, Is working out in the field helping people in need, Living in a different area, has great self esteem and confidence, Hell she even stopped smoking, so many other things.   3 of her UM's graduated from school now, off to college with scholarships and whatnot..

What the Hell is really so bad about a "Fixer Upper"...? 

It's 'bad' if you take the credit for those achievements. She did those things. We none of us can say if we achieved things BECAUSE we were in partnership or whether we would have achieved them anyway, or if we would have achieved them in partnership with someone else.
I'm sorry if I read you wrong, but I had a mother who used to say; I'm so proud of her as if SHE had done my degree etc. I have had a ex husband who was quoted as saying: When I met her she was living in a hovel.....
I have had an ex partner who said: When I met her she was on medication.....ARRGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHH.  By all means, if as a Dom one feels the need to shape and mold and chamge a submissive, then by all means as it's a free world. However, please don't take credit for the sub's achievement.



I was by no means trying to take FULL Credit,  I am proud of what she Achieved... So what are you trying to express that I should take ZERO credit for anything here?  That I don't have the right to pat myself on the back and Take Partial Credit?  That Gee, it's somehow wrong to express my role or involvement what so ever?

OK, fine I should be taking ZERO Credit for any of this?... That I had not involvement? That I played no role?... Geeessshh....

It's a wonderful Day in the neighborhood... La De Da!! 

Warning - Nobody take any Credit for helping Improve anybody's elses life, you just might be Looked Down upon by other people... 

I'm proud of what she achieved AND I'm proud of what I did as well.  I'm going to take credit for my role in things Regardless of what you say, think or otherwise feel.   If you feel this makes me arrogant or an ass... Meh... whatever...  

< Message edited by Owner4SexSlave -- 5/21/2008 2:52:25 PM >

(in reply to Prinsexx)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 2:49:02 PM   
CalifChick


Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
But to take it to the point where "correct speech", as defined by the submissive, must be brought into the dominant's consideration each time the dominant chooses to say something?


Sir, I don't disagree with you.  Really, I don't.  I'm not saying that the dominant cannot say what he chooses, I'm saying that he is doing it knowing what it does to me. Sure I can try to tell myself that he means it differently than I do, but sometimes those deep down "I'm not worthy" feelings are hard to get past. 

Or maybe this is an area that I need some of that shaping and molding in.

Cali


_____________________________

AKA "The Undisputed Goddess of Sarcasm", "Big Bad Cali" and "Yum Bum". Advisor to the Subbie Mafia, founding member of the W.A.C. and the Judgmental Bitches Brigade, member of the Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's and Team Troll

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 3:06:29 PM   
Owner4SexSlave


Posts: 1311
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
Also to note: When I met her, I was not thinking to myself, gee I found the perfect girl to shape and mold, that I have to mold her to this or that way.

In the course of 7 1/2 years, there were many changes that happened in her life and her kids life.  The Biggest reward was hearing her thank me for being there, being supportive, and in dealing with all the issues along the way.  That she herself felt that she would not have been able to do these things without me.

Her mother, father, not even her sister was there the Day she graduated from college.  Her family support basically sucked.  Which was one of the things holding her down, is that she did not have anybody that was morally or otherwise supportive.

The people in our lives do make a difference in our lives.  If you only have crappy friends, family and relationship partners, well that says a lot right there about your life to a degree.

I don't know about you guys!  But who here as ever had the one person that made a difference in your life.   Be it a teacher, A lover, A Spouse, A friend, somebody that actually without them, well things just might not have turned out so well?

Why are some people being so damn bullheaded in seeing or understanding this? 

Is it because I'm a Dom?  Please remove label immediately from your mind and look at me as a human being.

(in reply to DominantJenny)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 5:23:11 PM   
SleepyDom


Posts: 118
Status: offline
Nobody came to my high school graduation, or when I got my bachelor's or master's or any such events.  But hey, nobody got to shape and mold me and that's what matters haha.  (Really, I'm not blaming anybody I didn't want any "moral support" especially from my "family.")

This discussion is mostly Much Ado About Nothing.  And lots of idiotic strawman arguments.  Just because somebody wants to shape and mold you doesn't mean you're not good enough, why are you taking it that way when nobody means that?  But then who wants things that are "just good enough"?  Why are you so offended at the notion that somebody wants to change you?  Is it the ego thing?  Surely nobody thinks they're actually perfect.  I guess if you're actually perfect you should be offended that somebody wants to improve you.

I can see a dominant being offended if the sub wanted to change him as he obviously didn't sign up for that.  But isn't that what a sub signing up for when she consents to his will, to obey him?  Ok, I guess only a slave agrees to obey always, and a sub might retain some "you can't go there" things and get offended when he tries to go there.  In which case it's a compatibility issue.  You just find different partners that you're compatible with and that's that.  But some of you discuss this as if we're dealing with hard limits which is perplexing.  No dominant would want to damage his sub by breaking her actual hard limits.  And if you're saying "no" to things that are not hard limits then either you're just incompatible and should move on or you're just being disobedient in which case you deserve punishment or release.

There's a line by Robin Williams in Good Will Hunting that in effect says that there's no one perfect, but there is someone perfect for you, that you fall in love with her for small things (the way she pouts, the way she can't help keep thinking of x when you mean y, the way she always confuses your uncle with another friend, etc.) that are seeming flaws even.  The point being that flaws aren't always flaws--that they can even be things you love about someone.  That's really cute, romantic, and I even agree with that, and maybe that's why a lot of you are thinking "I'm not perfect, but these imperfections shouldn't necessarily be changed."  I agree with that too.  But I don't think any dominant is talking about such things when trying to "shape and mold" someone.  I'd never want to change things about my sub that I love.  Other things though--yea I have no problem effecting change.

Other discussions seem mostly semantic.  If I got her to quit smoking, be more respectful and honest in her dealings with people, and dress her in more sexy clothes, have I turned a Chevy into a Ferrari?  I don't know.  Don't even know what difference that makes.  What kind of change is radical enough to qualify as that?  And if she really wants to be with me and consents to such changes, why should I tell her to find another Dom who can appreciate her as she is?  On the other hand, if she doesn't consent, then we have at least a compatibility issue and moving on would probably be a good idea.

And oh mist, a boob job would take care of that, those plastic surgeons are pretty good at shaping and molding in that department.

(in reply to Owner4SexSlave)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 6:56:53 PM   
CalifChick


Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: California
Status: offline
SD, who said anything about being perfect?  TO ME (and that's what the question was... what does this mean to YOU), it is a matter of degrees.  To me, shape & mold is extreme... support/encourage is not.  If I am such a horrible/displeasing/whatever person that I must be changed to an EXTREME degree to be acceptable/pleasing/the best I can be in your eyes, then why bother?  Why not find someone who is much CLOSER to your ideal?  Surely the path of enhancing that woman would be far less arduous than trying to remake me.

It's not an ego thing, it's probably a bad childhood thing, who knows.  There, I found something to blame on my father today, I can rest easy tonight.

Cali


_____________________________

AKA "The Undisputed Goddess of Sarcasm", "Big Bad Cali" and "Yum Bum". Advisor to the Subbie Mafia, founding member of the W.A.C. and the Judgmental Bitches Brigade, member of the Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's and Team Troll

(in reply to SleepyDom)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 7:09:20 PM   
SleepyDom


Posts: 118
Status: offline
I don't know, Cali, and I don't want to go read all the posts again (once was bad enough) to see who said anything about being perfect.  As for "shape and molding" being extreme, again semantics.  I don't want to argue about the meaning of the words.  They don't strike me as extreme; they strike you as extreme.  Let's leave it at that.  And you're right, I would never bother with anyone that I thought were so horrible/displeasing/whatever.  On the other hand, I have no problem "shaping and molding" someone who was very desirable/pleasing/whatever.  And I suppose it also depends on the kind of shaping and molding.  I would never bother with an addict, for instance, or someone with severe psychological problems.  I don't have the skills or the desire to effect change in such things.  Others, though, I don't mind so much, and can be even fun and rewarding.

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 8:58:25 PM   
gypsygrl


Posts: 1471
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: new york state
Status: offline
quote:

Avoid using the words, shape or mold, because she might drop her barbie dolls and run away screaming for her life.


Heh.

Try using the word doormat.  Just wispering that word scares off the faint of heart.


_____________________________

“To be happy is to be able to become aware of oneself without fright.” ~Walter Benjamin


(in reply to Owner4SexSlave)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 9:18:23 PM   
ownedgirlie


Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: gypsygrl

quote:

Avoid using the words, shape or mold, because she might drop her barbie dolls and run away screaming for her life.


Heh.

Try using the word doormat.  Just wispering that word scares off the faint of heart.



LOL true, very true. 

_____________________________

Good is the enemy of great.

(in reply to gypsygrl)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 9:23:05 PM   
gypsygrl


Posts: 1471
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: new york state
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie

quote:

ORIGINAL: gypsygrl

quote:

Avoid using the words, shape or mold, because she might drop her barbie dolls and run away screaming for her life.


Heh.

Try using the word doormat.  Just wispering that word scares off the faint of heart.



LOL true, very true. 


It makes it easy to tell the men from the boys, though. :)


_____________________________

“To be happy is to be able to become aware of oneself without fright.” ~Walter Benjamin


(in reply to ownedgirlie)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/21/2008 10:47:58 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
And what seperates the girls from the women, is when they run when you ask them if they are "useful".
 
 And not just for sex.

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to gypsygrl)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/22/2008 6:56:21 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SleepyDom

I can see a dominant being offended if the sub wanted to change him as he obviously didn't sign up for that.  But isn't that what a sub signing up for when she consents to his will, to obey him?  Ok, I guess only a slave agrees to obey always, and a sub might retain some "you can't go there" things and get offended when he tries to go there.  In which case it's a compatibility issue.  You just find different partners that you're compatible with and that's that.  But some of you discuss this as if we're dealing with hard limits which is perplexing.  No dominant would want to damage his sub by breaking her actual hard limits.  And if you're saying "no" to things that are not hard limits then either you're just incompatible and should move on or you're just being disobedient in which case you deserve punishment or release.


Careful...it seems to be incorrect to express this thought in some quarters nowadays, especially the part I've made bold.  Witness the response (or lack thereof) to ur2badored's similar question and the aggression-bordering-on-hostility when the thought is expressed by myself, other dominants and other submissives.

< Message edited by CreativeDominant -- 5/22/2008 7:49:58 AM >

(in reply to SleepyDom)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/22/2008 7:19:08 AM   
MadRabbit


Posts: 3460
Joined: 8/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: SleepyDom

I can see a dominant being offended if the sub wanted to change him as he obviously didn't sign up for that.  But isn't that what a sub signing up for when she consents to his will, to obey him?  Ok, I guess only a slave agrees to obey always, and a sub might retain some "you can't go there" things and get offended when he tries to go there.  In which case it's a compatibility issue.  You just find different partners that you're compatible with and that's that.  But some of you discuss this as if we're dealing with hard limits which is perplexing.  No dominant would want to damage his sub by breaking her actual hard limits.  And if you're saying "no" to things that are not hard limits then either you're just incompatible and should move on or you're just being disobedient in which case you deserve punishment or release.


Careful...it seems to be incorrect to express this thought in some quarters nowadays, especially the part I've made bold.  Witness the response (or lack thereof) to ur2badored's similar question.


Fuck that, man. If someone is too self important or too PC to have their behaviors, clothes, and hair by me without going "Well, what are you going to change for me?", they need to move on and find someone else.

It's a D/S relationship. Your giving up control and authority to me. Your submitting to my will. Get over yourself.

I think some people really want an egalitarian relationship on their terms with superficial appearance that they are giving up control and authority.

_____________________________

Advice for New Dominants
The Unpolitically Correct Lifestyle Definitions

Obama is NOT the Messiah! He's just a VERY NAUGHTY BOY

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/22/2008 7:21:08 AM   
Owner4SexSlave


Posts: 1311
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: SleepyDom

I can see a dominant being offended if the sub wanted to change him as he obviously didn't sign up for that.  But isn't that what a sub signing up for when she consents to his will, to obey him?  Ok, I guess only a slave agrees to obey always, and a sub might retain some "you can't go there" things and get offended when he tries to go there.  In which case it's a compatibility issue.  You just find different partners that you're compatible with and that's that.  But some of you discuss this as if we're dealing with hard limits which is perplexing.  No dominant would want to damage his sub by breaking her actual hard limits.  And if you're saying "no" to things that are not hard limits then either you're just incompatible and should move on or you're just being disobedient in which case you deserve punishment or release.


Careful...it seems to be incorrect to express this thought in some quarters nowadays, especially the part I've made bold.  Witness the response (or lack thereof) to ur2badored's similar question.


Yeah, the sort of Master.. how do you wish for me to dress, how do you wish for my hair to be styled, and how would you like this that and another thing.   Basically in short, were their physical apperence, actions and whatnot is shaped and molded according to their owners desire.   Gee, there are actually girls out there that simply enjoy it too!   Hell, you don't even have to force feed it upon them, argue, nor fight nor debate... It just simply is!!   Gee.. Wow, no head butting involved.   However, that's something I experienced in an M/s relationship.   What's a Dom to do with somebody who literally enjoys being micromanaged on certain levels?  Mmmmmm... Let me think about that one for a moment.

It's actually rather creepy and strange at first, if you've never had it before.  A slave who's there literally trying their best to please and serve and be a mirror reflection of you.   They are open minded enough to actually, enjoy the same hobbies or interests as you.   They seem to want to explore and get to know you fully.   If they find out how you like your toast buttered and whatnot, it just magically happens.   If they find out you enjoy watching TV shows, they are sitting there finding enjoyment in the same damn things.   Actually rather Adaptive creatures with very Open minds, willing to explore things...  But that could be a subject of a Thread in itself.   Hell, you don't even have to Break them down as person either.   I've been staying off from the submissive/slave willingness factor here!  

Still none the less, the things I have wroted about have a been a common denominator in all my relationships!  Be it M/s, Twisted Kinky Vanilla, Dom Power couple... whatever..  Same dynamics applies in the scope of being supportive, and having a role in the molding and Shaping!   Hell, yes!  It even shapes and mold me to who I am.   In many regards this is part of the problem I am dealing with today.   That I don't have to do D/s... I be part of Dom Power Couple... Gee... you think anything from my past as actually shaped and molded me too...

I'm digressing on a rant her.   D/s should not be a constant headbutting match battle of the wills, hang ups and whatever else that comes to mind.

Personally, there are those on CM I know or believe would not be a good match for me.  I'll leave it at that.  Just don't see things eye to eye.   OK, I'm done rocking the boat. 

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Shaping and Molding - 5/22/2008 7:26:09 AM   
Owner4SexSlave


Posts: 1311
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:


I think some people really want an egalitarian relationship on their terms with superficial appearance that they are giving up control and authority.


Lately, I've been wondering what's the difference between my "Twisted Kinky Vanilla relationships", compared to other some peoples D/s lifestyle relationships.  They seem well so similar... with or without the labels.      

< Message edited by Owner4SexSlave -- 5/22/2008 7:27:10 AM >

(in reply to MadRabbit)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Shaping and Molding Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109