Padriag
Posts: 2633
Joined: 3/30/2005 Status: offline
|
I decided to answer this without having read the thread first because I didn't want the answers of others to color my own reply. Instead I wanted to just focus on my own thoughts on the matter. quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner4SexSlave For all the Dom/mes out there; "What does shaping and molding somebody mean to you on a personal level" That phrase "shaping and molding", for me personally is connected both with responsibility, and with effort and with reward. The reward is what I see most focus on (and among some, the only thing they even consider). The reward is the end result of having shaped and molded someone to be what I desire, someone who is better able to be useful to me, bring me pleasure, make my life more comfortable... it is a selfish pursuit, but I have no problem with that. But, and here's the catch... it has a price. Part of that is the effort required to achieve that reward. Whether you call it "shaping and molding" or "training" or "teaching"... all of it requires a lot of effort, applied consistently, and over an extended period of time to achieve results. That means an investment of considerable time and energy on my part. It means correcting behavior even when I'm tired, it means providing encouragement even when I'm distracted by a dozen other things, it means being consistent even when I just don't feel like it. Beyond that, there is also the responsibility that comes with it. If I "shape and mold" someone to be a better servant, or companion, or slave, or pet or whatever for myself I have a responsibility to ensure that doing so doesn't "harm" them. Harm can be a very subjective thing. For example, let's say a dominant decides to mold a submissive into a deeply servile and devoted companion... with the consent of the submissive. But, suppose the dominant had no intention of a long term commitment, would that not then be at least questionable if not entirely irresponsible? What I mean to say is, what is or isn't irresponsible has to be considered within its context. If a dominant intended to entirely subjugate the Will of a submissive, making them entirely dependent on the dominant... that might be considered irresponsible outside of a long term commitment... but, if the dominant were prepared to support and care for that submissive for the rest of their life, is that really harmful? Some would likely say yes, because it flies in the face of many dearly held Western standards, particularly those of supposed equality and independence. Personally, I concern myself with more practical standards and pragmatic definitions of things. I can accept people doing pretty much as they please so long as they are willing to fully accept the consequences of what they do... and find that most aren't willing to do that. Want to entirely enslave someone, fine... but are you prepared to accept the full responsibility and consequences of that? Want to humiliate and degrade a submissive... fine... but are you prepared to deal with the aftermath, the effects of that? Want to shape and mold that submissive in to your fantasy bimbo-slut-pet... fine... have you thought it through... are you certain that's what you really want... are you prepared to live with it? I imagine some will disagree with my view, which is fine. A few might agree. I don't claim to see things as others do, nor to think or believe as others do. These are my thoughts on the question asked. To sum up my answer, I might phrase it this way. I personally believe a dominant can shape and mold a submissive into anything they can imagine provided they have the ability to do so, that they have considered the consequences of doing so, and that they are prepared to fully accept the responsibility for doing so.
_____________________________
Padriag A stern discipline pervades all nature, which is a little cruel so that it may be very kind - Edmund Spencer
|