RCdc -> RE: My 30% Rule (6/1/2008 3:39:29 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: fungasm Alison's 30% Rule: I will do anything a partner asks of me that does not damage myself, my partner, or anyone else and doesn't violate the laws of my country or the laws of physics. That said, I don't want a relationship where more than 30% of our sex life is spend engaged in any single activity. I do not quantify my activities or relationship. I also participate in activities that could be a violation of law depending on which country I was in at the time, and do damage or cause possible harm to each other. Sex is one of those activities, as an example. If I wasn't aware of the dangers that sexual intercourse with or without orgasm, I would call myself ignorant. quote:
So I've found that there are certain kinks which almost always will violate that rule: things that if that is what someone craves, that is what they always crave. So I tend not to enter long-term relationships where that is what is really wanted, because I feel it's not going to end well. Not that there is anything wrong with these, it's just that they aren't what I want to be doing all the time sexually- and sexuality is really important to me. Examples: feminization, erotic lactation, adult babies, humiliation in servitude, watersports, etc. On the other hand there are things which it's very rarely for a partner to want all of the time, which makes them more fun to explore: strap ons, TENS units, bondage, nipple clamps, rope bondage, spankings, canings, etc. How does this fit in your experience? It is purely about compatabilty, not about how boring something might become. the.dark.
|
|
|
|