RE: Why is this allowed ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


DomKen -> RE: Why is this allowed ? (6/7/2008 5:47:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin
Now I write on what I believe to be correct, if I am incorrect, fair enough, I don't know everything, nor am I going to research every possible angle prior to posting on here, as here I believe is an area where people can engage in friendly off topic conversation. Like I referenced earlier, what is written on the internet can be truth, or it can be fiction, it is upto the viewer to decide.

My reason for posting this topic was to stimulate conversation, nothing more, I did not wish to engage in an argument with another because he has an internet link to truth and of which, my apologies to all,I have since found out since all this crap started on this topic that Darfur does indeed have oil, something which of course is cock all use in alleviating the human suffering there. If this admittance of mine that I was wrong and that makes alumbrado fire his wad, then cool, but can we get back on topic please.

While he has been annoying in pointing it out you parroted the initial link and the extreme pro arab side even though many people pointed out where you were wrong. You could at least acknowledge your errors




Aneirin -> RE: Why is this allowed ? (6/7/2008 6:04:43 PM)

In every story, there is often two sides, it is just that I am loathe to cow tail to one side without seeing the other side and it has always been with me that injustice riles. I am just aware that perhaps we are not being fed all the information, so I seek it in order to make my own judgment,. Somewhere in all the extremes of both sides there is truth as it applies to both.




popeye1250 -> RE: Why is this allowed ? (6/7/2008 7:26:09 PM)

I could never figure out that "Links please!" thang.
So, instead of my opinion someone wants me to provide a "link" to another person's opinion?




Archer -> RE: Why is this allowed ? (6/7/2008 8:20:16 PM)

because this is allowed by the other side.

http://judaism.about.com/library/1_terrorism/bl_worstattacks.htm

http://www.israelnewsagency.com/roshshanaterrorism.html

http://www.onefamilyfund.org/Portals/0/WWH_Pics/Terror_Today/Latest_Attacks/1217_Yeshiva_Mar6/bullet_glass_body_Small.jpg

Each side can argue till they are blue about who is worse, and that will yield nothing but continued death on both sides.

When Isreal forced their own settlers to abandon their homes because they were in areas the government had said they were giving that land back.
That has been the only REAL attempt recently and the response by Hamas, continued rockets.
Funny how it's the side ruled by Hamas that continues to be a problem while the side that Fatwa controls seems by all reports to be having far less trouble.
Maybe it's the rocket attacks by Hamas, you think it could be??????

And how are you explaining the Hamas murders of Fatwa members of last year? Those in the Fatwa controled areas seem to be relatively peacefull and relatively Isreali attack free compared to the folks living in the Hamas controled areas. Think that might be something of value?????
Hamas launches rockets every day, Fatwa doesn't, Hamas territories get Isreali respnses and the resulting deaths, Fatwa areas dont.

HMMMMMMMMMMM









DomKen -> RE: Why is this allowed ? (6/7/2008 8:32:49 PM)

Fatah not Fatwa. It's the PLO faction arafat led.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.015625