DomAviator -> RE: "America's Medicated Army" (6/12/2008 3:44:46 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Oh, and FYI, a British military study proved that keeping troops at the sharp end by using amphetimines leads to a higher suicide rate, unwarrented killing (i.e killing of unarmed civilians), and even murder of fellow soldiers. Amphetamines routinely lower the human emotional restraint against cruel and inhuman acts of violence, which, unless I am mistaken in what we are supposed to be doing in Afghanistan and Iraq, which is to put a stable and more humane government in power. If it is just to allow our troops to run up personal body counts and give them really good food for future nightmares, well then all I have pointed out is a moot point. Its about body counts. I was so paranoid and jumpy that if some Iraqi lit a cigarette I saw a flash and fragged his ass. Why do you think we bomb weddings etc? The drugs make us sharp, perceptive, and healthily paranoid and that leads to a good target prosecution rate, low losses, and a high body count. You have to realize that aircraft cost $30,000,000 training me cost $6,000,000 and training the NFO sitting beside me cost $4,500,000. That is 40.5 million dollars worth of taxpayer money flying over hostile territory. Enemy civilians are free, they can breed more... Better I be sharp and jumpy and bomb a civilian who lit a smoke than that I am overcautious and wind up losing the aircraft and taking myself and the BN out of the fight to spend weeks, months, or years in a POW camp. The loss of that aircraft can mean that a pinned down unit cant get the air support it needs, or that the military objective will not be accomplished. That cant happen and if it take drugs to improve performance, it takes drugs. Its all about winning. In war there is no "first runner up".
|
|
|
|