domtimothy46176
Posts: 670
Joined: 12/25/2004 From: Dayton, Ohio area Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: pinkpleasures i cannot give details because that would help identify the individual, and i have no desire to hold him up to public scrutiny. i needed something from him for a rather important reason (to me) and he refused me because it would have (evidentially) detracted from his self-importance. it may seem like a small thiing -- which it is not to me -- but it is revealing and to me, this is akin to being lied to. i thought we were friends, which to me implies mutual respect and support. His support was withheld when i needed it, and he insulted me by calling me "melodramatic". The friendship is over; and i am sad. However, my Op is not about "what happened to me" but rather, having given/acepted a friendship, do you feel honor has a place in how you interact with your friend? (Personally, i find what he did dishonorable.) pinkpleasures I'm quite surprised that this thread has survived for 77 posts. I'll waive my rights to confidentaility, counselor. I have no issue being held up to public scrutiny whatsoever. I do take issue, however, with your continuing claim that I only refused to grant your favor because of my "self-importance". While you are welcome to your opinion, the fact is, you over-stepped your bounds. If you have issues with being quoted, you shouldn't post on a public forum. I had no obligation to remove the quote of yours I was responding to simply because you decided to edit the post it was taken from. If you hadn't written it, I wouldn't have responded to it. Having acquiesced to a similar request in the past does not obligate me to grant you such a boon again. I did you no harm, despite what I consider to be melodramatic claims to the contrary. Obviously, melodramatic is a hot-button word but, for me, it most clearly defines the behavior I was criticizing. If, for the sake of argument, there was damage done by virtue of the fact that evidence remained of your post, it was self-inflicted when you first clicked the send button. I had imagined that you would, given the opportunity for reflection and time to consider my comments within post #13 of this thread, find that your decision to hold me at fault was misdirected. This is not the first time I've misjudged someone and probably not the last. I will,however, reiterate the sentiments represented by the closing paragraph of my earlier post: Whatever is at the root of your disagreement, a real friendship will weather differences of opinion so long as both parties find the friendship to be of sufficient value to make the effort. If he's your friend, the two of you should be able to work it out. If you can't get past this bump in the road, then maybe it wasn't truly a friendship at all. For the record, I don't engage in friendships that require me to suspend my judgement or compromise my beliefs. I also don't bottom, ever. If friendship requires obedience or withholding criticism, I'm just not friendship material. I suppose it's best that you discovered this while I'm still only a cyber-personality. Best wishes, Timothy
< Message edited by domtimothy46176 -- 11/7/2005 7:25:15 PM >
|