RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


MrRodgers -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (6/30/2008 5:00:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

This admin perpetrated 9/11 and closed the books on a currently very successful cover-up as far as they are concerned, with the bogus 9/11 commission.

This admin. has been the most successful at keeping secrets and especially on 9/11 and wants us living blissfully in our ignorance and fear. (successfuly so far too)



Have you got any real evidence, and i dont just mean cobbled together news stories.



Do your homework, look at ALL of the evidence. They won't let you, leaving such obvious questions as to leave many professionals baffled. Their evidence is all you get. Trust me...if a jet airliner crashed in PA. like the admin. said...I am the queen of Egypt and if a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon...I am the fucking King of England.

Where did these planes go ? Did they just vanish, passengers, luggage and all ?

ONLY 3 buildings in the ENTIRE history of steel constructed buildings...we are to believe...ever fell from fire damage. ALL on 9/11. They didn't...they were demolished (blown up) ALL 3.

Why is the govt. not disclosing 83 video tapes trained on the pentagon 24/7 ? This is the most video-monitored protected building on the face of the earth. What are they hiding ?

How is it that over 100 times in recent years EVERY private aircraft entering Pentagon air space was intercepted...but even 40-45 of warning, still...not on 9/11 ? Why is it that with 5 missile installations programmed to fire at 1 min from the Pentegon did NOT fire ?

I could on and on...and on.

[Mod Note: quoted TOS vioation removed]




jlf1961 -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (6/30/2008 5:59:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Do your homework, look at ALL of the evidence. They won't let you, leaving such obvious questions as to leave many professionals baffled. Their evidence is all you get. Trust me...if a jet airliner crashed in PA. like the admin. said...I am the queen of Egypt and if a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon...I am the fucking King of England.

Where did these planes go ? Did they just vanish, passengers, luggage and all ?


All wreckage, bodies, luggage and other debris were clearly shown on the news footage of the pentagon and the PA crash sites. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
ONLY 3 buildings in the ENTIRE history of steel constructed buildings...we are to believe...ever fell from fire damage. ALL on 9/11. They didn't...they were demolished (blown up) ALL 3.


Actually, there have been more than three, a hotel in the states, a building in japan, one in madrid, one in germany.

Now, since you seem to have forgotten a few basic concepts in physics, I will attempt to explain this to you.

What was witnessed in the collapse of the Twin Towers is called a pancake collapse.

This occurs when the structure above a given point is compromised to the point of complete failure.  Once the top most floor, or any floor above a given point collapses, all floors above that point will collapse as well.  As it collapses, the total mass on each lower floor is increased, overstressing the structural limit and adding to the catastrophic failure.

That is exactly what happened with the twin towers. 

By the way, controlled demolition is done from the bottem up, not the top down.

WTC building seven had a different structural problem, that being that the entire area of the first three floors was occupied by an atrium, (large open area with no supporting columns.)  When one side of this structure was comromised, it collapsed, in this case toward the two towers.


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Why is the govt. not disclosing 83 video tapes trained on the pentagon 24/7 ? This is the most video-monitored protected building on the face of the earth. What are they hiding ?

Actually, there were more than 83 tapes hat caught images of the aircraft that impacted the Pentagon. 

There are the 83 Pentagon Security tapes, released to the general public in 2004, the video surveillance tapes of two gas stations, video tapes made by five separate tourists driving past the Pentagon on the beltway.  All of these tapes have been released.


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
How is it that over 100 times in recent years EVERY private aircraft entering Pentagon air space was intercepted...but even 40-45 of warning, still...not on 9/11 ? Why is it that with 5 missile installations programmed to fire at 1 min from the Pentegon did NOT fire ?

I could on and on...and on.

[Mod Note: quoted TOS vioation removed]



Since 1990, there have been more than 5000 violations of the air space over Washington DC.  Only 100 of these were intercepted in the air.  This included the aircraft that dropped a sky diver onto the white house lawn.

As for the Washington ADIZ ( Air Defense Identification Zone) the unit that commands these SAM sites you are referring to... WELL guess what.....

One of the most well-known recent additions to the collection of North American ADIZs is the Air Defense Identification Zone (Washington DC), which was created after the September 11, 2001 attacks by Al-Qaeda. The attacks, which used commercial airliners in large-scale suicide attacks, caused an increase in airborne security measures, including the establishment of the new ADIZ.

It did not exist prior to 9/11/2001, now in the immortal words of Roy Clark, PUT THAT IN YOUR PEACEPIPE AND SMOKE IT MINIHAHA.






DomAviator -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (6/30/2008 6:17:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Do your homework, look at ALL of the evidence. They won't let you, leaving such obvious questions as to leave many professionals baffled. Their evidence is all you get. Trust me...if a jet airliner crashed in PA. like the admin. said...I am the queen of Egypt and if a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon...I am the fucking King of England.

Where did these planes go ? Did they just vanish, passengers, luggage and all ?

ONLY 3 buildings in the ENTIRE history of steel constructed buildings...we are to believe...ever fell from fire damage. ALL on 9/11. They didn't...they were demolished (blown up) ALL 3.

Why is the govt. not disclosing 83 video tapes trained on the pentagon 24/7 ? This is the most video-monitored protected building on the face of the earth. What are they hiding ?

How is it that over 100 times in recent years EVERY private aircraft entering Pentagon air space was intercepted...but even 40-45 of warning, still...not on 9/11 ? Why is it that with 5 missile installations programmed to fire at 1 min from the Pentegon did NOT fire ?

I could on and on...and on.

[Mod Note: quoted TOS vioation removed]



A few points :

1) The 9-11 crash debris looks different from most airliner crashes because airliners generally do not crash above their stall speed. A "typical" crash of a transport category aircraft occurs at a speed of approx 140 kts or less. Airline pilots generally do not make what we call "Controlled Flight Into Terrain". Thus a more valid analouge of the debris fields would be that observed when a high performace military aircraft slams into terrain... I have been to more of those than I care to remember and the 9-11 debris is entirely consistent with a high speed impact. Remeber, these aircraft hit those buildings at a speed 4 - 5X that of a typical crash as airline pilots slow down and try desparately to minimize the impact they dont spool up to beyond Vne and collide with terrain.   

2) Your idea of automatic SAM batteries programmed to fire automatically etc is PURE FANTASY. Not only is there no such system, but if there were there could be no Reagan Natl Airport! The US miliatry has NO such thing as an automated anti-aircraft system because they cannot and will not risk a mistake such as downing a friendly aircraft or civilian airliner. I mean wouldnt it be just peachy if that sucker locked onto NAOC or Air Force or Marine One because of an improperly set IFF code?

3) I have been on both sides of restricted airspace - as the interceptor pilot and as the pilot being intercepted.  I dont know where you get the idea that anything could have been done on 9-11. Do you think jet fighters in the CONUS sit around on the tarmac fully armed and loaded for bear? They didnt. At that time there was maybe four or five hot birds on the entire eastern seaboard. The "Alert Five" aircraft (ready to fly within 5 min) are where the threat is... Alaska, Greenland, Northern Canada etc - for bombers coming in on a great circle route over the poles. Even in the ADIZ (Air Defense Identification Zones) off our coasts the majority of the time the intercepts are unarmed Coast Guard Falcon Jets (A corporate jet Like a Lear) I have patrolled the ADIZ and intercepted while the only armament on the F/A-18 was my pistol!  We arent up there to fly CAP over US cities we are there to VISUALLY IDENTIFY. Essentially we just confirm that Yep, thats a Continental Airways 777 and not a soviet transport flying a civilian schedule and route... Even if there had been hot bird to scramble - there was no protocol in place to down a US registry civilian airliner in US airspace. PERIOD. I know the NATOPS manual inside and out, and can recite it in my sleep. I taught primary flight, intermediate, and advanced strike at Strike-U in Fallon and I am utterly unaware of any way short of a presidential order to down a US airliner on US soil. How taht presidential order would be confirmed I dont know. I would do it if it came through the National Command Authority (the Emergency Action Message system used for authorizing nuclear strikes... But I dont know if anyone would have thought of that in the heat of the moment. There was no mechanism in place to authenticate such an order... In any event, you know how many "intercepts" are done by police helicopters, etc.... For fucks sake we had an intercept here in restricted airspace and the "interceptors" was a NASA T-38 jet trainer (unarmed) who made the guy follow him to Ellington Field where he got his ass chewed by the HPD helicopter pilot LOL. The big deal comes later when you get "that letter" from the FAA... Atta and Co wouldnt be alive to get "that letter"...

4) Steel buildings can and do fall regularly in fire. So do oil rigs, refineries, chemical plants... all kinds of steel structures. Steel is nowhere near as strong as you think and if you heat it, it will warp like a son of a bitch and buckle. Thats why you have to preheat when you weld and to skip weld long seams. (weld 6" go a foot away do another 6" come back and back weld etc)  Dont believe it? Try running a 3' long continuous bead on a piece of 1/4" plate... You will wind up with a 2" hump on the middle of it  and a giant ass stress crack.... Steel in a fire expands, buckles, stress cracks and fails.... Thats a fact - ask anyone who knows how to weld how steel behaves when heated unevenly or under stress.....




farglebargle -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (6/30/2008 6:20:06 PM)

4b) Construction in NYC ***SUCKS*** and it didn't take all that much extra stress to bring down the SHITTY CONSTRUCTION in the first place.... ( Hey, where'd all the concrete go? Pools in Jersey in the late 60's...)

Hell, they can't even keep construction CRANES from falling over and killing people.





DomAviator -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (6/30/2008 6:25:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


As for the Washington ADIZ ( Air Defense Identification Zone) the unit that commands these SAM sites you are referring to... WELL guess what.....

One of the most well-known recent additions to the collection of North American ADIZs is the Air Defense Identification Zone (Washington DC), which was created after the September 11, 2001 attacks by Al-Qaeda. The attacks, which used commercial airliners in large-scale suicide attacks, caused an increase in airborne security measures, including the establishment of the new ADIZ.

It did not exist prior to 9/11/2001, now in the immortal words of Roy Clark, PUT THAT IN YOUR PEACEPIPE AND SMOKE IT MINIHAHA.





Uh ADIZ have been around since Ive been flying... (24 years) They are not in any way related to SAM sites, nor are they a "military unit that commands sam sites", nor are they a post 9-11 event. They are also NOT confined to Washington.

All  they are is a thick dotted magenta line on the sectional chart  that marks the beginning of US airspace. Any flight crossing the ADIZ line must be in contact with ATC or it will be assumed to be a drug smuggler or hostile flight and intercepted. It is exactly as the name implies an "Air Defense Identification Zone". Identify yourself - "Continental Two Four Two" Well alrighty then have a good day Two Four Two...

Edited to add: For everything you could ever want to know about ADIZ and intercept procedures I refer you to:

http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/ATpubs/AIM/Chap5/aim0506.html

In any even it has NOTHING to do with surface to air missle batteries, its a "how to legally enter US Airspace" thing...




jlf1961 -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (6/30/2008 6:42:12 PM)

I was reprinting what was under the Washington Air Defence information that came up on google.


As I have said before, I be a lowly grunt, you be one of dem der flyboys wif all da really neat gadget thingies....


Of course DA, being a grunt does allow me on luxury you dont have.... I aint gotta worry bout Mr. SAM comin up and saying hi to me......




DomAviator -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (6/30/2008 6:46:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I was reprinting what was under the Washington Air Defence information that came up on google.




OK well just s you know for future reference, the information is in error. An ADIZ is a line on the chart, used to define the point of entry to US airspace and hence the procedures to legally penetrate it. Ie foreign pilots must contact ATC at least one hour out to say where they will enter, you have to come in within five minutes of when you say you will and within 20 miles of your intended course etc... Its not new, its not 9-11 related and its not a military unit. Its a thick magenta line on a chart.. Nothing more. [:D]




MrRodgers -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (6/30/2008 9:40:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Do your homework, look at ALL of the evidence. They won't let you, leaving such obvious questions as to leave many professionals baffled. Their evidence is all you get. Trust me...if a jet airliner crashed in PA. like the admin. said...I am the queen of Egypt and if a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon...I am the fucking King of England.

Where did these planes go ? Did they just vanish, passengers, luggage and all ?


All wreckage, bodies, luggage and other debris were clearly shown on the news footage of the pentagon and the PA crash sites. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
ONLY 3 buildings in the ENTIRE history of steel constructed buildings...we are to believe...ever fell from fire damage. ALL on 9/11. They didn't...they were demolished (blown up) ALL 3.


Actually, there have been more than three, a hotel in the states, a building in japan, one in madrid, one in germany.

Now, since you seem to have forgotten a few basic concepts in physics, I will attempt to explain this to you.

What was witnessed in the collapse of the Twin Towers is called a pancake collapse.

This occurs when the structure above a given point is compromised to the point of complete failure.  Once the top most floor, or any floor above a given point collapses, all floors above that point will collapse as well.  As it collapses, the total mass on each lower floor is increased, overstressing the structural limit and adding to the catastrophic failure.

That is exactly what happened with the twin towers. 

By the way, controlled demolition is done from the bottem up, not the top down.

WTC building seven had a different structural problem, that being that the entire area of the first three floors was occupied by an atrium, (large open area with no supporting columns.)  When one side of this structure was comromised, it collapsed, in this case toward the two towers.


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Why is the govt. not disclosing 83 video tapes trained on the pentagon 24/7 ? This is the most video-monitored protected building on the face of the earth. What are they hiding ?

Actually, there were more than 83 tapes hat caught images of the aircraft that impacted the Pentagon. 

There are the 83 Pentagon Security tapes, released to the general public in 2004, the video surveillance tapes of two gas stations, video tapes made by five separate tourists driving past the Pentagon on the beltway.  All of these tapes have been released.


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
How is it that over 100 times in recent years EVERY private aircraft entering Pentagon air space was intercepted...but even 40-45 of warning, still...not on 9/11 ? Why is it that with 5 missile installations programmed to fire at 1 min from the Pentegon did NOT fire ?

I could on and on...and on.

[Mod Note: quoted TOS vioation removed]



Since 1990, there have been more than 5000 violations of the air space over Washington DC.  Only 100 of these were intercepted in the air.  This included the aircraft that dropped a sky diver onto the white house lawn.

As for the Washington ADIZ ( Air Defense Identification Zone) the unit that commands these SAM sites you are referring to... WELL guess what.....

One of the most well-known recent additions to the collection of North American ADIZs is the Air Defense Identification Zone (Washington DC), which was created after the September 11, 2001 attacks by Al-Qaeda. The attacks, which used commercial airliners in large-scale suicide attacks, caused an increase in airborne security measures, including the establishment of the new ADIZ.

It did not exist prior to 9/11/2001, now in the immortal words of Roy Clark, PUT THAT IN YOUR PEACEPIPE AND SMOKE IT MINIHAHA.



Sorry, the tapes I've seen do not show anything like a Boeing 757 airliner of some 60 to 100 tons, a 44 ft tail and 125 ft wing span fly into the pentagon and left a 16 ft hole. A SIXTEEN FOOT HOLE ? Froma Boeing 757 airliner no less. Nearby windows were still intact and construction supplies on the ground virtually undisturbed. The wall outside that was supposed to have taken the brunt of the collision didn't even fall over until 20 minutes after the crash.

Eye witnesses have said they saw what was a small craft like a commuter plane 12-18 passengers. Another actually said it was a cruise missile. IT was a cruise missile.

Air defenses had 40-45 minutes to act and didn't. The jets from Andrews were 100's of miles south on an exersize...why just at that time ? Jets that were scrambled did so 40 minutes after these 'hijacked' planes changed transponders and were from 105 miles away.

There were in fact right after the crash at the pentagon, no passengers, no luggage, no engine 6 tons ea. of titanium and steel i.e. they should have been there...they were not...in short, no airplane.

The Somerset, Pa. county coroner was is on tape doing local news at the alleged crash scene in Pa. Said his investigation took 20 minutes...no dead bodies, no blood.

Hijackers are presumably those who took the plane and died in the attacks yet 6 so-called hijackers are STILL alive. One in Saudi Arabia even announced to the world that he was not only alive but couldn'y fly a glider, yet the FBI still calls him a 'dead' hijacker.

The tapes from a nearby gas station and hotel were confiscated by the FBI and held for years, then and only then returned and shown. They show nothing like a 757 hitting the pentagon. Eye witnesses from the gas station flatly dispute the 9/11 report on the direction of whatever it was that hit the pentagon (came from the left of them) yet the commission insists it came from the right of this station.

Where are all 83 tapes and undoctored...we will never see them ? NO !!

The WTC's 1, 2 and 7 are another story, look at the tapes, listen to the eye witnesses, there were explosions all throughout the building. There was molten metal at the bottom of the building meaning Thermite and Thermate explosives were used to cut the steel. If this was a 'good' fall...where were the pancaked floors still at least partially intact at the bottom ? They were dust and rubble...just like in a demolition.

NO STEEL STRUCTURED bldg has ever fallen i.e. collapsed in rubble like this from fire damage alone ever...in history. It simply doesn't burn hot enough and even with jet fuel. It takes special explosives to bring a building down like that. Engineers said the WTC 1 and 2 could have survived several planes hitting it and they only burned for less than an hour.

I could go on and on and on.




Alumbrado -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (6/30/2008 9:49:28 PM)

Thermite explosives?  How exactly are the girders in skyscrapers cut during construction again?




stef -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (6/30/2008 10:17:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

thermite...
cover-up...
cruise missle...

and on and on...

Real0ne, is that you?

~stef




DomAviator -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (6/30/2008 10:24:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


NO STEEL STRUCTURED bldg has ever fallen i.e. collapsed in rubble like this from fire damage alone ever...in history. It simply doesn't burn hot enough and even with jet fuel. It takes special explosives to bring a building down like that. Engineers said the WTC 1 and 2 could have survived several planes hitting it and they only burned for less than an hour.

I could go on and on and on.



You could go on and on and you would still be wrong....

Lets have a look at this oil rig - http://www.flickr.com/photos/20712368@N06/2191011601/ Wasnt made of linquini but look at it.... (and jet fuel burns hotter than crude)

Here is another steel building "post fire" http://www.flickr.com/photos/58359963@N00/2338963515/

and yet another http://www.flickr.com/photos/universalwrecking/2560285747/

Here is the Piper Alpha oil rig collapse... It too is STEEL and a steel structure engineered to greater loads than a land based building http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOOjKXv5EoQ 

quote:

the tapes I've seen do not show anything like a Boeing 757 airliner of some 60 to 100 tons, a 44 ft tail and 125 ft wing span fly into the pentagon and left a 16 ft hole. A SIXTEEN FOOT HOLE ? Froma Boeing 757 airliner no less. Nearby windows were still intact and construction supplies on the ground virtually undisturbed. The wall outside that was supposed to have taken the brunt of the collision didn't even fall over until 20 minutes after the crash.

Eye witnesses have said they saw what was a small craft like a commuter plane 12-18 passengers. Another actually said it was a cruise missile. IT was a cruise missile.

Air defenses had 40-45 minutes to act and didn't. The jets from Andrews were 100's of miles south on an exersize...why just at that time ? Jets that were scrambled did so 40 minutes after these 'hijacked' planes changed transponders and were from 105 miles away.

There were in fact right after the crash at the pentagon, no passengers, no luggage, no engine 6 tons ea. of titanium and steel i.e. they should have been there...they were not...in short, no airplane. 




If this wasnt so pitiful I would laugh... Tell ya what - go get yourself an ATP license, with a Flight Engineer - Turbojet certificate and a type rating in at least one Boeing aircraft and then well discuss this futher. Im typed in B727, 737, 747, and 777 and it looks just right to me... Oddly enough, nobody I know who actually can fly a heavy jet sees the problems you do.... However, we do laugh heartily at consipracy theorists and the absolute absurdity of their beliefs... Interesting that you know more than the guys type rated to fly the things, because I have never heard a pilot advance one of these theories...

As for your cruise missle theory. Comical at best. Here is a hint on military life. You launch a missle from a ship and the whole fucking crew knows it. It will wake the dead. You launch one from land and the neighboring townspeople see for miles.... You launch one from the air and everyone knows that you went up with it and didnt come back with it.... You cant fart in the military without someone knowing it. The gossip mill is unreal, worse than 5000 old ladies. When I was planning to propose to Nikki, guys were warning me out of it before I mentioned the thought to anyone... They knew just cause I was looking at a jewlery ad... There is NO WAY you could keep an attack on the fucking Penatgon secret - for christs sake I couldnt my girlfriend and I being kicked out of a hotel cause she was a screamer from becoming squadron humor. (they actually gave her a flight jacket with a name tag bearing the call sign "Banshee" )

These conspiracy theories are off the wall at best... Pathetic at worst.




jlf1961 -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (6/30/2008 10:30:04 PM)

First of all, this was about torture, not 9/11.

Second of all, jet fuel burns at 1796F, steel melts to a liquid at 2750°F.  Now that seems to discount steel melting as a possibility, but, it does not.

Steel becomes malleable at between 1700 and 2000 degrees.  Ask any blacksmith, you have to get steel red hot to work it.  If you want to forge a blade, i.e ax, knife, sword, you have to get the metal white hot.

Now, there is a trick to getting steel that hot... you use forced air to bring the temperature up, in a blacksmith's forge this is done with a bellows.

Now, before you start screaming "but there was no forced air present at the World Trade Center" I am going to explain where that forced air came from.

The forced air that increased the fire temp in both the towers came from two sources.  The chimney effect of pulling air up through the building as the fires burned, and the dynamic of how sky scrapers change the air patterns around them.  

It is a well known fact the WTC moved with the wind.  It was designed to do just that.

However, fires in and of themselves draw more air to them, it is the nature of the best.  Stand around a house fire sometime, or even a wildfire, you will experience it first hand.

The engineers that designed the WTC designed the building to handle an impact of an aircraft the size of a DC 9 liner, your basic two engine commuter jet, since that was the type of aircraft that was normally flown in that air space.

The towers were also built to withstand the impact of a DC 9 at landing or approach speed.

They were never intended to withstand the impact of a 757 at high speed intentionally flown into the building.

Now, you probably disbelieve the damage caused to American warships in WW2 by Kamikaze pilots.  I mean these were propeller driven aircraft crashing into steel ships with steel armor.  Yet, these aircraft crippled and damaged, even sank a number of warships.

These aircraft did not carry large amounts of explosives, about 500 pounds.  Yet they were devastating.

There are three types of weapons that would do the damage and cause the structural failure of those towers. And thermite on the steel skeleton of the buildings at ground floor wont do the trick.

Remember the first WTC bombing?  The damage then was so extensive the safety of the two towers was in question.  More than half the structural supports were blown out from under the middle of the complex.   The towers did not collapse then.

Besides, you dont use thermite to cut a building support structure.  You use primacord and centrex.  Thermite is a very localized reaction, and to get enough together to destroy the world trade center would be rather difficult.

Now, primacord burns at the same rate that it explodes, which is the reason you could wrap a length around someone's arm or leg, pop it and neatly amputate and cauterize the wound at the same time.  Add centrex plastic explosives to that, any you will easily take out the CONCRETE encased steel supporting columns.  Thermite will not do this. 

You see, builders and designers are a bit of a daffy bunch.  Steel columns just look ugly.  So they encase the steel in a 24x24 concrete column, which not only makes them stronger, but has the added effect of increasing fire protection.  Once past the main floor, the steel is hidden behind these things called walls, and covered with a spray on fire RETARDANT, not a fire proofing.

In other words, you can use all the thermite you want in the sub basement and you are going to scorch the concrete and poison the air around you, but do little else.  And if a truck bomb weighing in at 4000 pounds didnt bring the building down the first time, what makes you think they are gonna be able to do that a second time.

Furthermore, a controlled demolition keeps everything inside the footprint of the building, this was not the case with the WTC, you can slow down the footage of the collapse and see quite clearly the outer walls being pushed outward, a prime example of a pancake collapse.

Now, I have a few other little secrets to share with you...

There was no UFO at Roswell NM, Hanger 13 at Wright Patterson Air Force base is not used to house alien technology, or I should say, not used to house extraterrestrial technology.  Area 51 at groom lake nv is the home to the lockheed skunk works, nothing more and nothing less, and if there are aliens watching us, they have long since given up on the possibility of intelligent life on this rock.






DomAviator -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (7/1/2008 12:00:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Second of all, jet fuel burns at 1796F, steel melts to a liquid at 2750°F.  Now that seems to discount steel melting as a possibility, but, it does not.

The engineers that designed the WTC designed the building to handle an impact of an aircraft the size of a DC 9 liner, your basic two engine commuter jet, since that was the type of aircraft that was normally flown in that air space.

The towers were also built to withstand the impact of a DC 9 at landing or approach speed.

They were never intended to withstand the impact of a 757 at high speed intentionally flown into the building.

Now, you probably disbelieve the damage caused to American warships in WW2 by Kamikaze pilots.  I mean these were propeller driven aircraft crashing into steel ships with steel armor.  Yet, these aircraft crippled and damaged, even sank a number of warships.

...

Besides, you dont use thermite to cut a building support structure.  You use primacord and centrex.  Thermite is a very localized reaction, and to get enough together to destroy the world trade center would be rather difficult.

Now, primacord burns at the same rate that it explodes, which is the reason you could wrap a length around someone's arm or leg, pop it and neatly amputate and cauterize the wound at the same time.  Add centrex plastic explosives to that, any you will easily take out the CONCRETE encased steel supporting columns.  Thermite will not do this. 



For the most part I agree but a few corrections of fact and additions....

The burning temperature of Jet-A in atmospheric air is 549.5 degrees, the 1796  degree figure you quote is the maximum temperature - being burned in an optimal mix in the hot section of a tubine engine, using compressed air.

With that said - of course there is thermite present in the debris, and molten steel to indicate a thermite reation... What is thermite? A simple mix of alumimum and iron. What are airplanes made of? [:D] Keep in mind as well that there is a substantial amount of magnesium present on an airliner - and magnesium burns quite hot and is in fact used to ignite thermite... So the burning of the aluminum and steel ignited by the magnesium covers the thermite theory...

In addition to the jet fuel, aluminum, and magnesium and other reactive metals there is also a substantial amount of oxygen on board an airliner. No less than two medical units, enough to support one pilot for the ENTIRE time they are above 41,000 (above FL 410 one pilot is on oxygen at all times, and above FL250 one pilot is on oxygen if the other leaves his station or is engaged in other duties. ) There must also be emergency oxygen for ALL passengers sufficient to last for the entire time the aircraft will be above 15000 feet.  Oxygen and a fuel is a cutting torch! LOL

Then of course we have a cargo hold full of hazardous materials. You would be amazed at whats carried in the bellies of an airliner. There is a whole course that must be taken annually regarding the HAZMAT carried in the hold.

Now regarding the DC-9 , thats not a commuter plane. Depending on the configuration and series the DC-9 is a 90,000 to 120,000 pound plane that seats 80 - 140 passengers. Definitely not a commuter! However, you correctly noted that no building was designed for a full speed impact.

As for the Kamikazees. During WW2 most Navy ships, including carriers, had wooden decks. Thats what the kamikazees tried to hit.

As you noted, thermite is NOT explosive nor is it used for cutting. They actually often use it to weld railroad rails and ground connections on utility wires. However, the explosive you refer to is CEMTEX not CENTREX. (The former is an explosive the latter a type of telephone service)

It also bears mention that to drop a building by controlled explosive demolition requires WEEKS of preparation. Holes are cut, beams and columns are notched and cut with a torch, holes are drilled with a jackhammer, and literally miles of detcord, firing lines, and blasting caps are strung and wired together. My ex-father in law was a union ironworker and he spent something like 8 weeks torching and drilling steel in preparation for the demolition of a former GM plant in Buffalo. The enginees and blasters marked what needed to go and an army of ironworkers weakened the structure, drilled hole, cut stuctural members, cut out sections of floor, notched things etc in preparation for the blasters loading the holes, tying it all together and bringing the building down.

Nobody reports weeks of advance work, at least one test shot on a column, and a building full of notched columns, beams wrapped in chain link fencing, cut holes, torched steel and a rats nest of yellow and green det cord, orange shock tube, and yellow and orange blasting cap wires with "EXPLOSIVE" tages every 8 feet cruss crossing the place.. LOL So we can rule out controlled demolition. For the benefit of those curious -and those who think the WTC was blasted - here is a very simplified explanation of how they do controlled blasting:

http://www.pacificblasting.com/implosionstory.html




jlf1961 -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (7/1/2008 2:20:06 AM)

Forgive my misspelling of the explosive, DA.  And when I referred to the DC 9 as a commuter, I was intending to point out that the aircraft is used for short hops anymore, not long haul.

However, the decks of navy ships in ww2 were indeed wood, over armour plate.  But that is actually beside the point.

The point is that the damage caused on 9/11 and the consparacies surrounding the day has reached a point where every time I see the BS preached I just want to bang my head against the wall (of course, as ugly as I am that might make a substantial improvement.)

However, if this person would like to see what happens when an airliner impacts the ground at speed, I would suggest he look at the tapes of the aircraft that flew into mountains at speed, or even the ones that suffered control surface failure and lost control and dove into the ground.

National Geographic Channal has a series called 'seconds from disaster.'  Quite informative, and strangely enough, some of the airliner crashes covered in the series do bear an uncanny resemblence to the crash sites from 9/11, simply because of the speed of impact.

I am not sure how the equation works, but force at impact is a combination of speed and mass of an object.

Another point, that the consparacy theorists have forgotten or ignored is that two F15's were scrambled after Air Traffic Control lost the transponder signals.  They arrived in NYC airspace after the second impact. 

Another thing, in a situation like 9/11, those aircraft could not have been shot down without the express orders from NORAD.  NORAD needs a weapon release from the JCS.  And the JCS is not about to make a decision on that magnitude without knowing all the facts, which takes time.

Now, for those who want to know what thermite is used for as an explosive, it is used in incedinary  grenades, as well as willy pete, aka white phosphorus.  A thermite grenade is quite effective to take out a tank if you can place the grenade in the right spot, and do so without being seen.

Now while I would love to blame the present administration for 9/11 simply because I have not like George Bush even when he was governor of Texas, I cannot dispute the facts, or physics.






thishereboi -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (7/1/2008 4:48:49 AM)

I guess that means no, you don't have any real evidence. Why don't you just admit that, instead of going on another rant.




MrRodgers -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (7/1/2008 8:39:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomAviator

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


NO STEEL STRUCTURED bldg has ever fallen i.e. collapsed in rubble like this from fire damage alone ever...in history. It simply doesn't burn hot enough and even with jet fuel. It takes special explosives to bring a building down like that. Engineers said the WTC 1 and 2 could have survived several planes hitting it and they only burned for less than an hour.

I could go on and on and on.



You could go on and on and you would still be wrong....

Lets have a look at this oil rig - http://www.flickr.com/photos/20712368@N06/2191011601/ Wasnt made of linquini but look at it.... (and jet fuel burns hotter than crude)

Here is another steel building "post fire" http://www.flickr.com/photos/58359963@N00/2338963515/

and yet another http://www.flickr.com/photos/universalwrecking/2560285747/

Here is the Piper Alpha oil rig collapse... It too is STEEL and a steel structure engineered to greater loads than a land based building http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOOjKXv5EoQ 

quote:

the tapes I've seen do not show anything like a Boeing 757 airliner of some 60 to 100 tons, a 44 ft tail and 125 ft wing span fly into the pentagon and left a 16 ft hole. A SIXTEEN FOOT HOLE ? Froma Boeing 757 airliner no less. Nearby windows were still intact and construction supplies on the ground virtually undisturbed. The wall outside that was supposed to have taken the brunt of the collision didn't even fall over until 20 minutes after the crash.

Eye witnesses have said they saw what was a small craft like a commuter plane 12-18 passengers. Another actually said it was a cruise missile. IT was a cruise missile.

Air defenses had 40-45 minutes to act and didn't. The jets from Andrews were 100's of miles south on an exersize...why just at that time ? Jets that were scrambled did so 40 minutes after these 'hijacked' planes changed transponders and were from 105 miles away.

There were in fact right after the crash at the pentagon, no passengers, no luggage, no engine 6 tons ea. of titanium and steel i.e. they should have been there...they were not...in short, no airplane. 




If this wasnt so pitiful I would laugh... Tell ya what - go get yourself an ATP license, with a Flight Engineer - Turbojet certificate and a type rating in at least one Boeing aircraft and then well discuss this futher. Im typed in B727, 737, 747, and 777 and it looks just right to me... Oddly enough, nobody I know who actually can fly a heavy jet sees the problems you do.... However, we do laugh heartily at consipracy theorists and the absolute absurdity of their beliefs... Interesting that you know more than the guys type rated to fly the things, because I have never heard a pilot advance one of these theories...

As for your cruise missle theory. Comical at best. Here is a hint on military life. You launch a missle from a ship and the whole fucking crew knows it. It will wake the dead. You launch one from land and the neighboring townspeople see for miles.... You launch one from the air and everyone knows that you went up with it and didnt come back with it.... You cant fart in the military without someone knowing it. The gossip mill is unreal, worse than 5000 old ladies. When I was planning to propose to Nikki, guys were warning me out of it before I mentioned the thought to anyone... They knew just cause I was looking at a jewlery ad... There is NO WAY you could keep an attack on the fucking Penatgon secret - for christs sake I couldnt my girlfriend and I being kicked out of a hotel cause she was a screamer from becoming squadron humor. (they actually gave her a flight jacket with a name tag bearing the call sign "Banshee" )

These conspiracy theories are off the wall at best... Pathetic at worst.


Let me see...a marriage proposal and needing my pilots license so you are out of substance or why bring them up ?

My last word here on the subject BUT:

Your first two links are no longer there and the third refers to an EXPLOSION.
Explosions DO bring steel structures down and there were explosions at WTC 1 and 2 BEFORE the planes hit and from as low has the 4th floor below ground.

12 countries warned us of an attack coming...the Israelies even broke there lease and got the hell out 1 prior to 9/11. Yet we our govt. did nothing.

The WTC was a white elephant...nobody wanted it or to move into it or stay in it. It was an old office building not equipped for the modern office.

Still there was brand new leaseholder just 7 WEEKS before 9/11 with a special new clause in that lease because no fool in his right mind would lease the WTC. WHY ? Not only was this office park an old piece of shit but was facing a $1 BILLION asbestos mitigation rehab. No buyer or investor in his right mind would take a lease on these buildings but with this NEW lease. What was in that lease ?

$3.5 BILLION payoff IF it was damaged or destoyed by terrorist attack. A lease unacceptable to almost all insurers and especially now hey. But not this landlord and who was the lessor...the NY Port Authority who was losing $$ on this 40+ yr old complex. (Note: because there were two planes..i.e. two attacks, insured filed for $7 Billion...is still in litigation I understand)

In the previous 7 months prior to 9/11 there were power outtages one lasting a week. Nobody was in these buildings during this time EXCEPT construction crews working under cover of darkness. When employees returned they noticed that not only had tenants been moved without any notice but found grey dust all over the building. Why ?

Thermate is an exceptionally hot type of explosive and used in the demolition (not construction) of steel buildings. Was Thermate and the rest for the demo equip. of this building being installed during these power outtages ? Is that why the grey dust was found all over the building prior to 9/11 ? How is it that Thermate...discovered at the bottom of these buildings and along with the molten steel never addressed by 9/11 commissioon ?

A plane hits a building and starts fires and damages no more than 6 floors (77 to 83) YET that hit alone was enough...not to just bring down but to totally demolish almost completely to dust a 110 story build of some 200,000 tons of steel. Bullshit.

Look the pentagon does have 5 (24/7) active 'SAM' sites ready to fire, it is singularly the most video taped and militarily protected building on the planet...yet not this ONE DAY...why ? Under FOIA ther has been a long running law suit seeking the release of some 83 tapes STILL being held and covered up by the FBI. First the FBI said they needed more time and this was 2006, when asked how long...they said indefinately...why ? Now the FBI says these tapes don't even exist.

The pentagon WAS hit by a remote control cruise missile designed by Raytheon whose employees are ready (157 people there and others) to come forward once there is GRAND JURY and not before. Why ? Because very understandably...they are scared. Why ? Because the top 5 Raytheon executives in remote control, cruise missile design...guess what...you guessed it DIED on 9/11 ALL FIVE...what are the odds and how convenient.

It is the admin. and its sympathizers and yes...most people that are buying their conspiracy theories. Bin Laden, the Taliban and Al-Quada and Hussein in fact had nothing to do with 9/11.

The 9/11 commission completely disregarded $100,000 wired to Mohammed Atta (from a Pakistani general that admin. members were enjoying lunch with during these attacks) actually writing that WHO did and HOW 9/11 was financed was of no importance. NO IMPORTANCE ??

Just for the 'fun' of it...let's look at WTC 7...NEVER even hit by a plane..a NY Fire chief on the radio reports that with a couple of engines, they could put these fires out. No plane crash induced fire. Plus, NO SPRINKLER system THAT DAY...why ? It too was demolished...why ? I'll tell you why...it had CIA offices in it, FBI offices, NY City emerg. response center and last but not least for sure...SEC office in it. 15...FIFTEEN years of SEC investigations into wall street, Enron and the like ($70 billion rip-off by elect. power manipulation in Cal.) ALL gone. After 9/11, the NYC FED. SEC office didn't even exist. HOW convenient.

Then there is a real laugh if you want laughs...through a violent plane crash, through the disintegration of a 110 story building supposedly brought on by that plane crash, the passport...that's right, a paper passport of a hijacker somehow miraculously survived pristine. That's almost as good as the magic bullet that didn't need to be magic to inflict wounds on both men but oh boy...do all that AND show up PRISTINE on a cot in a hosp.

The perpetrators rely upon that sick feeling in your stomach that our govt. could actually do such things...trust me, they can and they have..















Sanity -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (7/1/2008 8:48:21 AM)

Nah, can't be. MrRodgers spells too well.

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

thermite...
cover-up...
cruise missle...

and on and on...

Real0ne, is that you?

~stef





FirmhandKY -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (7/1/2008 9:28:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Nah, can't be. MrRodgers spells too well.

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

thermite...
cover-up...
cruise missle...

and on and on...

Real0ne, is that you?

~stef




Even if his thinking is just as ... murky.

Firm




stef -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (7/1/2008 10:00:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Nah, can't be. MrRodgers spells too well.

He could have finally figured out the ancient mysteries of the spellcheck.  But then again, he's not trying to back up his argument by using venerable sources like Jones/Rense and their ilk.

~stef




Owner59 -> RE: These rats are responsible for the torture... (7/1/2008 10:16:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

thermite...
cover-up...
cruise missle...

and on and on...

Real0ne, is that you?

~stef



Lol,now that was a low blow...[:D]

Now ,I thought we could discuss torture in a more civilized way.[;)]



The history channel did a good debunking of all the 9/11 truther theories.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ5i7dVawsA

Getting a link at the History Channel`s whole show isn`t working right now.This clip deals with the "Building 7" issues.

Bush didn`t help matters any though.In an effort to hide his bungling and mistakes,he resisted the 9/11 investigations at every turn and withheld evidence.

They had to get subpoenaed into testifying and only then did so on the condition that they "not be under oath"!!

Letting the Saudis leave the US without law enforcement 1st interviewing and investigating them, looked really bad.At best,Bush was earning his money as their lacky,at worse,he was letting people who might have been involved in 9/11 get away.

That kind of bullshit ,unwittingly feed and fueled the 9/11 truthers.




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625