MissIsis
Posts: 473
Joined: 1/1/2005 Status: offline
|
You know. I used to think I was being shallow if I based wanting a relationship or not, on looks. I got involved with men whom I felt no physical attraction. That was then. You know what I found out. I found out, I wasn't being shallow at all, & should have listened to that wee little voice in the back of my mind. The relationships didn't work out. In fact, I was sorry I was ever involved with them in the first place. And now...... well, lets just say, I have decided if I am not attracted to someone then I will not become involved with them, unless, their other attributes far outweigh the looks part. I have decided that I can have it all. I can become involved with someone who is attractive to me, & has all the wonderful other qualities that I find desireable in a man. Why shouldn't I have it all? Why shouldn't we all, have it all? I like a man with a little meat on him, but I certainly don't want to have to wade through globs of fat to find the place where he spits his brains out of, either. Now, my idea of attractive isn't necessarily someone who looks like a Greek god either. It is usually something in his eyes. Sometimes it is big strong arms. But, I really hate it when I start to get to know someone & I think I have a general idea of what they look like by a picture, but when I meet him, he is much bigger than what his picture showed, & he is much older than what his picture shows. It is disappointing. I'll do the first real time meeting over coffee or dinner, but after that, I am pretty much done. In my eyes, it is equivalent to lying, & I generally don't want to have to deal with the drama associated with people who lie. They always have a way of bringing drama with them. I don't expect a perfect appearance, but I do expect attraction & that he was honest about what he looks like. And I definitely want to know that he is supporting himself & anyone else he might be responsible for. I refuse to support grown men.
|