RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Brain -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 12:55:17 AM)

 
Barack by the books
The works that have influenced Obama illustrate that he would be the most literary president in recent memory -- and one likely to govern from the center

July 7, 2008 | Perhaps the best key to the Barack Obama phenomenon (as opposed to Obama the man) is a book that never even mentions the Illinois senator: Rob Walker's "Buying In: The Secret Dialogue Between What We Buy and Who We Are." Observing the launch of Red Bull, an energy drink, Walker noted that instead of attempting to assert the brand's identity to a mass market, the manufacturer pursued a strategy of what he calls "murketing," sponsoring low-key events geared to distinct niches; ask any of these groups what Red Bull is and you're likely to hear a different answer. By refusing to define Red Bull, advertisers allowed each slice of its overall market to interpret the beverage for itself. Likewise, the "vagueness" that many flinty political junkies complain of in Obama permits all sorts of disparate people -- progressives, independents, intellectuals, young people, minority advocates, renegade Republicans -- to see the reflection of their own desires in the self-described "skinny kid with a funny name."

http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2008/07/07/obama_books/index.html




rulemylife -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 5:59:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomAviator

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

This is a cheap political stunt......

Even the "balls" are fake.




   I'll leave it to our resident Naval Aviator to explain just how tight those harnesses are...  Same principle as a push-up bra, really.


    Yes.  Cheap political stunt from Rangel.


Heretic, you are absolutely right. The harnesses are so tight that Naval aviators routinely sustain bruises from them. Anyone claiming bush "stuffed" is stooping to wishful thinking or penis envy. In reality those "balls" were his boxer shorts wadded up under a baggy flight suit with a harness tight enough to allow him to be hoisted by helicopter if needed.

BrittneyLee has an innie, not an external three piece set, and when I took her up in an L-39 she looked like she was hung like a mule because of the parachute harness, hoisting harness, and life vest straps bunching up the flight suit.  Thats the normal flight suit look, probably part of the reason that gold wings and a flight suit mean damp panties in any woman nearby... [:D] One has to wonder exactly why the dems are so fascinated with Bush's crotch though....

Edited to add: Before anyone in an attempt at Bush blasting says "he didnt have to have it that tight"... Yes, he did.A loose harness will break bones during an arrested landing wihich has a vicious deceleration best described as a controlled crash. You also exprience tremendous G forces. I weigh 230 lbs, If I make a 5g maneuver then I am exerting a force of 1150 pounds against the harness.

As for the political stunt   - I see a former fighter pilot, who is the commander and chief of the US Armed Forces, going out to a Navy vessel wearing the appropriate safety attire for anyone flying in a tactical jet. Nothing unusual about a commander going out to review his troops. You can't fly in Viking wearing tennis shoes and a 3 piece suit... I didnt fly the Viking, but I wore that exact same outfit every time I flew in anything with NAVY painted on it - only the squaron and name tag patches were different... 


Ohhhhhhhh, okayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, so it wasn't a political stunt.  Yeah, I see what you mean.  Obviously the only way a President can visit an aircraft carrier is to strap himself in and arrive in a fighter.  How silly of anyone to think otherwise!

And, by the way, don't disgrace those that were actually fighter pilots by equating this weekend warrior who got to play in an airplane around Texas with the real thing.




Owner59 -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 6:12:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

The best case would be another Bush the First? Doesn't say too much does it?

Bush I was a fairly decent President.  Did a better job in foreign policy than Bill and HIllary by a wide margin. 



 
With such a ~wide margin~,you should easily be able to give five or ten examples of how Bush 'I' did a better job at foreign policy.

That`s to hard.....

Ok,...three.

Give us tree solid and demonstrable examples of how Bush I did better at FP.
                      




TheHeretic -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 6:16:59 AM)

         Barfing on the Japanese Prime Minister was good.




rulemylife -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 6:23:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

        Barfing on the Japanese Prime Minister was good.


[sm=rofl.gif]




DomAviator -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 6:45:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife


Ohhhhhhhh, okayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, so it wasn't a political stunt.  Yeah, I see what you mean.  Obviously the only way a President can visit an aircraft carrier is to strap himself in and arrive in a fighter.  How silly of anyone to think otherwise!

And, by the way, don't disgrace those that were actually fighter pilots by equating this weekend warrior who got to play in an airplane around Texas with the real thing.


Actually, the S-3 Viking is routinely used to transport VIP's out to a carrier at sea. Its not a fighter and never was. It was built as an anti-submarine aircraft, but the outdated antisubmarine warfare gear has long since been pulled out of most of them so its mostly used as a tanker, search aircraft, and VIP transport now. Air Force One doesnt have a tailhook so what would you have had them do, fly the President out on the fucking COD sitting between the mail sacks and the fresh fruit?

As for the second part of your post - Hmmmmmm, a commissioned officer in a military service assigned to fly a fighter interceptor owned by that miliary service??? Sounds a hell of a lot like he was "actually" a fighter pilot. FYI - the Texas Air National Guard is a real unit and men from the 147th (or its predecesor) have served in every conflict from WW1 through to Iraq. Bush volunteered to go to Vietnam, but his request was denied because he didnt have the 500 hours in type that the Air Force required for ANG replacement pilots.

Defending the Texas coast is not the bullshit mission you mistakenly assume it to be. There are dozens of highly vulnerable targets in the Houston area that would utterly cripple the US ecomomy and the war effort if hit. A relatively small number of aircraft hitting the refineries would put fuel prices up through the roof and a hell of a lot of people would freeze to death in the Northern states because we just plain wouldnt have heating oil at any price. Likwise, what little diesel and jet fuel would be left in the US without the refineries here would go to the military so your store shelves would be pretty bare... You dont rebuild a refinery in a month, more like several years...

We saw on 9-11 what happens with 3 civilian planes sucessfully attacking three office buildings so what do you think some armed warplanes could do to oil refineries, chemical plants, multimillion gallon oil storage tank farms, NASA, the South Texas Project - which is the largest nuclear plant in the USA, offshore rigs, and one of the busiest shipping ports in the world ??? The "Guardians of the Gulf" ARE real pilots who defend some extremely critical infrastructure. If you dont think so, head on down to Ellington Field and tell a few of them how they are a bunch of weekend warriors who disgrace real fighter pilots. Give that a try and let me know how ya make out... [:D]




Owner59 -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 6:46:41 AM)

"There's no question in my mind that this president and this administration would never have invaded Iraq, especially on the flimsy evidence that was presented to the Congress, if indeed we had a draft and members of Congress and the administration thought that their kids from their communities would be placed in harm's way".

~~~~~~~~~~

Does it being true but also embarrassing to your boy Bush, make it a stunt?Obviously, yes.


If it`s true and can be demonstrated so,it`s only a stunt to those who are fucking things up so badly.

Does the military think it`s a stunt?


You`re a republican who voted for that lying loser cheat,probably twice.


That`s the reason you`re against strengthening and rebuilding our sourly depleted ranks.Not because it isn`t necessary,but because a draft would be a huge political failure for the GOP.








If your boi Bush hadn`t been able top hide this blaring problem by hiring payed mercenaries(Blackwater and a dozen others) to meet the real demands on the ground in Iraq,this would have been settled years ago,with a draft or Bush`s ass kicked out of office.

He`s been able to cheat and game the system(using tax-payer money,our money,money borrowed on our kid`s future,btw) and so far has been able to put off "paying the piper".He`s been able to save face,but at our troop`s expence.                             




Owner59 -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 6:58:19 AM)

 
Or this great moment in daddy Bush`s presidency.

Don`t ya just love propaganda,at it`s naked best?  Errrr, worste?




Mercnbeth -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 11:43:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
Or this great moment in daddy Bush`s presidency.
Don`t ya just love propaganda,at it`s naked best?  Errrr, worste?

I don't know, it could be worse. For instance, if the only way to cast a favorable slant on the candidate you support is to point to the deficiencies of another.

However, observing how image over substance seems to work - I understand why its used, especially in this case.




SophiaCorrupted -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 11:50:50 AM)

quote:


. Air Force One doesnt have a tailhook so what would you have had them do, fly the President out on the fucking COD sitting between the mail sacks and the fresh fruit?




I'd probably have had them get him there the same way that the hundreds of other people (Press, secret service, other "VIPs" etc.) who wouldn't be usually be there arrived. If you think it wasn't all planned out to have him show up in plane with cameras surrounding him, you're just kind of dense.




Thadius -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 12:24:30 PM)

Does it matter who I voted for? I can't see how that is relevant to this discussion.

Actually, if you would have looked at the links I provided, you would have seen exactly what it was.  Rangel, the strongest pro draft guy in Congress, the man that wrote the resolution calling for bringing back the draft, voted against his own resolution HR 163.  If somebody believes in what they are putting forth, shouldn't they at least vote for it?  Even if it has no chance of passing?

I know I am a fringe element for being opposed to the draft.
quote:


Polling Data
Do you favour or oppose reinstating the military draft in the United States?





Favour

25%


Oppose

68%


Not sure

7%
Do you favour or oppose reinstating the military draft to provide soldiers for the Iraq conflict?





Favour

20%


Oppose

76%


Not sure

4%
Source: CBS News
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,136 American adults. Margin of error 3%.






Enlightenedespot -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 1:43:26 PM)

Or Colin Powell.




DomAviator -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 1:45:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SophiaCorrupted

quote:


. Air Force One doesnt have a tailhook so what would you have had them do, fly the President out on the fucking COD sitting between the mail sacks and the fresh fruit?




I'd probably have had them get him there the same way that the hundreds of other people (Press, secret service, other "VIPs" etc.) who wouldn't be usually be there arrived. If you think it wasn't all planned out to have him show up in plane with cameras surrounding him, you're just kind of dense.


Well as for the press - we can cover it with this : http://www.navyjobs.com/careers/enlisted/newsandmedia/

Yep thats right, the Navy has its own press both video, print, and still photo... There are ALWAYS cameras on carriers, hence the reason we can see the video of McCain leaping from his flaming A-4 after it was hit by a missle aboard the Forrestal. (Or perhaps you think that was filmed specially in the hopes that one day the young O-4 would run for president?)  Oh yes and we cant forget about the embedded press already on the ship...

Two secret service officers accompanied the President aboard the S-3 Viking. `Others may have been present and if so they came in on the COD, sitting between the sacks of mail and fresh fruit. The COD routinely delivers people and things to carriers at sea. It is an unpleasant bumpy slow pig of an aircraft, and not suitable for transport of VIP's. Hence the reason the S-3 is routinely used for bringing less important people than the President to a carrier at sea - it is kind of the "Carrier Based Corporate Jet" of the Navy whereas the Greyhound is more akin to a UPS truck... You wont see an Admiral arriving on the COD, and I certainly dont expect the President to.

Now since I am so "dense" (Despite spending over two years of my life at sea aboard carriers) exactly how unusual is it for the CEO of the company to arrive via corporate jet instead of riding in the back of a pickup truck with the field hands? Also, the "hundreds of people" you think went with him - exactly where did they stay? Hmmm? How many extra racks do you think they have on carriers???? Besides the quarters for the 5000+ men and women of the crew, how many guest rooms do you think they have?
 




SophiaCorrupted -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 2:52:18 PM)

 
quote:

" Well as for the press - we can cover it with this : http://www.navyjobs.com/careers/enlisted/newsandmedia/


Yep thats right, the Navy has its own press both video, print, and still photo... There are ALWAYS cameras on carriers, hence the reason we can see the video of McCain leaping from his flaming A-4 after it was hit by a missle aboard the Forrestal. (Or perhaps you think that was filmed specially in the hopes that one day the young O-4 would run for president?)  Oh yes and we cant forget about the embedded press already on the ship...


Last time I checked our news isn't state-run. I'm sure the navy's press did a great job taking photos for Military Nerds Monthly or whatever. Every single major news organization covered this, and I doubt every single major news organization had press embedded on what was essentially a no-name aircraft carrier. If you want to actually believe that there weren't a considerable amount of people flown in for this media event, that's fine, I don't really have any hard evidence otherwise, I don't think many people would agree with you though. The President tends to attract this kind of attention when he makes a speach.

quote:


Two secret service officers accompanied the President aboard the S-3 Viking. `Others may have been present and if so they came in on the COD, sitting between the sacks of mail and fresh fruit. The COD routinely delivers people and things to carriers at sea. It is an unpleasant bumpy slow pig of an aircraft, and not suitable for transport of VIP's. Hence the reason the S-3 is routinely used for bringing less important people than the President to a carrier at sea - it is kind of the "Carrier Based Corporate Jet" of the Navy whereas the Greyhound is more akin to a UPS truck... You wont see an Admiral arriving on the COD, and I certainly dont expect the President to.


Okay, if this stunt was so functional, where were Condoleeza Rice and Andy Card's jets at? Did they run out of jets? Or are they ranked lower than an admiral? Or maybe their planes ran out of room for the president.  I think it's more likely that they arrived in something sensible that wouldn't have made headlines. And let's be clear, this was the first time a president arrived onto a carrier in this fashion, so let's not act like this a regular occurance (Or even an occurance that makes sense.)

quote:


Now since I am so "dense" (Despite spending over two years of my life at sea aboard carriers) exactly how unusual is it for the CEO of the company to arrive via corporate jet instead of riding in the back of a pickup truck with the field hands?


I think this really just proves my point. There were better ways to accomplish this, yet the adminstration chose an fancy, overblown method of transportation to make headlines. It's one thing to ensure the President's safety, it's another to put him on a jet and film him landing on a carrier to set off the libido of the army of hicks that praise him.


quote:


Also, the "hundreds of people" you think went with him - exactly where did they stay? Hmmm? How many extra racks do you think they have on carriers???? Besides the quarters for the 5000+ men and women of the crew, how many guest rooms do you think they have?


Did you forget that the carriers mission was over? Considering that the the carriers mission had ended and it docked in San Diego later that night (CNN says they were 30 miles off the coast), I think it's safe to say that the people who arrived with him and were there to report on him probably walked off the ship instead of spending the night.


The theatre of politics...








rulemylife -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 3:30:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomAviator

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife


Ohhhhhhhh, okayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, so it wasn't a political stunt.  Yeah, I see what you mean.  Obviously the only way a President can visit an aircraft carrier is to strap himself in and arrive in a fighter.  How silly of anyone to think otherwise!

And, by the way, don't disgrace those that were actually fighter pilots by equating this weekend warrior who got to play in an airplane around Texas with the real thing.


Actually, the S-3 Viking is routinely used to transport VIP's out to a carrier at sea. Its not a fighter and never was. It was built as an anti-submarine aircraft, but the outdated antisubmarine warfare gear has long since been pulled out of most of them so its mostly used as a tanker, search aircraft, and VIP transport now. Air Force One doesnt have a tailhook so what would you have had them do, fly the President out on the fucking COD sitting between the mail sacks and the fresh fruit?

As for the second part of your post - Hmmmmmm, a commissioned officer in a military service assigned to fly a fighter interceptor owned by that miliary service??? Sounds a hell of a lot like he was "actually" a fighter pilot. FYI - the Texas Air National Guard is a real unit and men from the 147th (or its predecesor) have served in every conflict from WW1 through to Iraq. Bush volunteered to go to Vietnam, but his request was denied because he didnt have the 500 hours in type that the Air Force required for ANG replacement pilots.

Defending the Texas coast is not the bullshit mission you mistakenly assume it to be. There are dozens of highly vulnerable targets in the Houston area that would utterly cripple the US ecomomy and the war effort if hit. A relatively small number of aircraft hitting the refineries would put fuel prices up through the roof and a hell of a lot of people would freeze to death in the Northern states because we just plain wouldnt have heating oil at any price. Likwise, what little diesel and jet fuel would be left in the US without the refineries here would go to the military so your store shelves would be pretty bare... You dont rebuild a refinery in a month, more like several years...

We saw on 9-11 what happens with 3 civilian planes sucessfully attacking three office buildings so what do you think some armed warplanes could do to oil refineries, chemical plants, multimillion gallon oil storage tank farms, NASA, the South Texas Project - which is the largest nuclear plant in the USA, offshore rigs, and one of the busiest shipping ports in the world ??? The "Guardians of the Gulf" ARE real pilots who defend some extremely critical infrastructure. If you dont think so, head on down to Ellington Field and tell a few of them how they are a bunch of weekend warriors who disgrace real fighter pilots. Give that a try and let me know how ya make out... [:D]


Seems you are confusing two different time periods and two different enemies.  Were the Vietcong capable of attacking our shores and hitting these highly vulnerable targets?




rulemylife -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 3:46:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomAviator

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife


Ohhhhhhhh, okayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, so it wasn't a political stunt.  Yeah, I see what you mean.  Obviously the only way a President can visit an aircraft carrier is to strap himself in and arrive in a fighter.  How silly of anyone to think otherwise!

And, by the way, don't disgrace those that were actually fighter pilots by equating this weekend warrior who got to play in an airplane around Texas with the real thing.


Actually, the S-3 Viking is routinely used to transport VIP's out to a carrier at sea. Its not a fighter and never was. It was built as an anti-submarine aircraft, but the outdated antisubmarine warfare gear has long since been pulled out of most of them so its mostly used as a tanker, search aircraft, and VIP transport now. Air Force One doesnt have a tailhook so what would you have had them do, fly the President out on the fucking COD sitting between the mail sacks and the fresh fruit?

As for the second part of your post - Hmmmmmm, a commissioned officer in a military service assigned to fly a fighter interceptor owned by that miliary service??? Sounds a hell of a lot like he was "actually" a fighter pilot. FYI - the Texas Air National Guard is a real unit and men from the 147th (or its predecesor) have served in every conflict from WW1 through to Iraq. Bush volunteered to go to Vietnam, but his request was denied because he didnt have the 500 hours in type that the Air Force required for ANG replacement pilots.

Defending the Texas coast is not the bullshit mission you mistakenly assume it to be. There are dozens of highly vulnerable targets in the Houston area that would utterly cripple the US ecomomy and the war effort if hit. A relatively small number of aircraft hitting the refineries would put fuel prices up through the roof and a hell of a lot of people would freeze to death in the Northern states because we just plain wouldnt have heating oil at any price. Likwise, what little diesel and jet fuel would be left in the US without the refineries here would go to the military so your store shelves would be pretty bare... You dont rebuild a refinery in a month, more like several years...

We saw on 9-11 what happens with 3 civilian planes sucessfully attacking three office buildings so what do you think some armed warplanes could do to oil refineries, chemical plants, multimillion gallon oil storage tank farms, NASA, the South Texas Project - which is the largest nuclear plant in the USA, offshore rigs, and one of the busiest shipping ports in the world ??? The "Guardians of the Gulf" ARE real pilots who defend some extremely critical infrastructure. If you dont think so, head on down to Ellington Field and tell a few of them how they are a bunch of weekend warriors who disgrace real fighter pilots. Give that a try and let me know how ya make out... [:D]


Seems you are confusing two different time periods and two different enemies.  Were the Vietcong capable of attacking our shores and hitting these highly vulnerable targets?

And I have to stand by my first statement, don't dare compare those who lost their lives in actual combat to the sons of the wealthy who pulled strings to be pretend fighter pilots so they could sit out the war.




DomAviator -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 3:47:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Seems you are confusing two different time periods and two different enemies.  Were the Vietcong capable of attacking our shores and hitting these highly vulnerable targets?


Yes! They were. I am sure that North Vietnameese Mig Pilots would have been more than welcome in sunny Cuba. (Being Comrades and all) They would have been as welcome as the Russian Mig Pilots including the "Russian Advisors" who flew in North Vietnam. Of course the Cubans themselves could have decided to allie themselves with their communist brothers in North Vietnam at any time...  It was a tense time in history, decapitating the US oil supply would have made it pretty easy for the russian tanks to roll across europe...

However, it doesnt take any communists at all - 19 students with box cutters could have done the trick as we saw in 2001...

By the way, FAR more fighter pilots die in peace than in war. Every time you strap on a military jet you are taking your life in your hands. They crash regularly, come apart for no apparent reason, kill people in training etc... Bush's air national guard time was hardly safe... Military pilots die frequently.   




slvemike4u -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 3:51:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomAviator

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife




Seems you are confusing two different time periods and two different enemies.  Were the Vietcong capable of attacking our shores and hitting these highly vulnerable targets?
Well given the fact that the defense of the southern borders was placed in this young mans hands and taking into account the alcohol and drug induced haze his young bushies  mind was in ,we can all thank whatever higher power we believe in that the VietCong had no such ability




Thadius -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 3:56:31 PM)

quote:

In a passage describing his high school experience in Hawaii, for example, Obama explains the allure of drugs: “I kept playing basketball, attended classes sparingly, drank beer heavily, and tried drugs enthusiastically. … If the high didn’t solve whatever it was that was getting you down,” Obama intones, “it could at least help you laugh at the world’s ongoing folly.”
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=F5C7DB1B-3048-5C12-00A742F62EA88F5C


Interesting...




slvemike4u -> RE: Obama: Just another lying, flip-flopping, political hack (7/8/2008 4:25:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

quote:

In a passage describing his high school experience in Hawaii, for example, Obama explains the allure of drugs: “I kept playing basketball, attended classes sparingly, drank beer heavily, and tried drugs enthusiastically. … If the high didn’t solve whatever it was that was getting you down,” Obama intones, “it could at least help you laugh at the world’s ongoing folly.”
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=F5C7DB1B-3048-5C12-00A742F62EA88F5C


Interesting...
You know what else was interesting he was doing his experimenting in high school ....while bushie was doing his stateside being awol from the ANG....thats interesting too don't you think...and for the record I'm not really a big enough hypocrite to hold youthful drug use against anyone....but than I don't get that hung up on other people recieving  blow jobs either...as long as I get mine You know what I mean




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.125