RE: Another church shooting (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


slvemike4u -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 5:28:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

Not so rediculous, take a look at some of the bills that were written during the Clinton years... thank god none of them made it to his desk.

There was at least one that did exactly what I described, banned all ammo capable of piercing body armor.
And your objection is the inevtable classification of a Polo golf shirt as body armor....and  you do not see the comedic value in such a position...




Thadius -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 6:22:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

Not so rediculous, take a look at some of the bills that were written during the Clinton years... thank god none of them made it to his desk.

There was at least one that did exactly what I described, banned all ammo capable of piercing body armor.
And your objection is the inevtable classification of a Polo golf shirt as body armor....and  you do not see the comedic value in such a position...


I do see the comedy in it.  Even if you don't change the definition of body armor... you do realize that virtually all rifle ammunition used for hunting would fall under that label?




slvemike4u -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 6:29:00 PM)

Thadius I am not under the impression that anything will ever be done with rifles suitable for hunting.What I would have issue with are automatic weapons and handguns...that and supplying deer with body armor and I will be tickled ...




DomKen -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 6:31:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

Not so rediculous, take a look at some of the bills that were written during the Clinton years... thank god none of them made it to his desk.

There was at least one that did exactly what I described, banned all ammo capable of piercing body armor.
And your objection is the inevtable classification of a Polo golf shirt as body armor....and  you do not see the comedic value in such a position...


I do see the comedy in it.  Even if you don't change the definition of body armor... you do realize that virtually all rifle ammunition used for hunting would fall under that label?

WTF are you hunting with? FMJ might be typed as AP but its not a terribly good hunting round anyway.




Thadius -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 6:40:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Thadius I am not under the impression that anything will ever be done with rifles suitable for hunting.What I would have issue with are automatic weapons and handguns...that and supplying deer with body armor and I will be tickled ...


I am a bow hunter myself, so the body armor might be a little over the top. [;)]

quote:

President Clinton today proposed a new Federal ban on all armor-piercing bullets, whatever they are made of.
The proposal on bullets, virtually identical to a bill introduced by Representative Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of Brooklyn, would have little immediate effect, since Treasury officials acknowledge there is no such handgun ammunition now on the market.


This is how they attempted to go from the rounds used in rifles to those in handguns... I know the slippery slope, is just imagined. [;)]  Even if imaginary it must be looked at what ramifications certain laws will have if evaluated by an activist judge on either side of the spectrum.  As you can see there was no such ammunition for handguns on the market, so what is the need for the law?  One could argue that it was to prevent that ammo from ever being produced, or that body armor was going to be needed to be defined. 

Slippery slopes are the specialty of our elected officials... Just take a look at tax law, to get an idea of how it can become a very slippery slope. 




Thadius -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 6:52:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


WTF are you hunting with? FMJ might be typed as AP but its not a terribly good hunting round anyway.


You realize that you would have to go up to Type III or Type IV armor to even start seeing results against rifles that use center-fire ammunition?

quote:

http://www.sportsmenforclinton.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=23&Itemid=31 

Second, if the Attorney General were to choose type IIA armor as the bill expects, current, popular firearms and their ammunition would become illegal to own. Among them is any handgun more powerful than the .40 S&W. Then you enter a gray area. Any .223 handgun would be illegal, as would its ammuntion. But, a .223 rifle would be legal to own. But again, the ammuntion would be illegal.




slvemike4u -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 7:14:08 PM)

You raise interesting questions Thadius,the most interesting aspect of the whole conversation is that we are having it.Most on your side of the question would have just wrapped themselves in their interpretation of the 2nd amendment and refused to discuss the point,claiming as they are wont to do that the 2nd means "unfettered" in all its glory.
 




Thadius -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 7:22:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

You raise interesting questions Thadius,the most interesting aspect of the whole conversation is that we are having it.Most on your side of the question would have just wrapped themselves in their interpretation of the 2nd amendment and refused to discuss the point,claiming as they are wont to do that the 2nd means "unfettered" in all its glory.



I am very pro 2nd Amendment, however I am willing to hear the concerns of the other side, and could possibly be convinced that there was a reasonable position that would make both sides more comfortable.  Obviously, I am against outright bans.  I do believe that there is room to work on the liability and responsibility issues.  Like mandatory sentencing for people proven in a court of law to have made straw purchases.  I understand that if we don't discuss the issues, then nothing can or will be done.





slvemike4u -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 7:36:19 PM)

And Thadius if nothing is done who explains it to the parents of the children yet to die.I am fully aware that all tragedy's can not be averted,but my skin crawls when the argument is put forth that the answer to incidents like Virginia Tech is more guns on campus.How many national tragedy's before some attempt is made to remedy this situation...I don't have the answers,hell I don't even know all the right questions...all I know is far too many of our fellow citizens fall in front of these weapons..




FirmhandKY -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 7:56:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

And Thadius if nothing is done who explains it to the parents of the children yet to die.I am fully aware that all tragedy's can not be averted,but my skin crawls when the argument is put forth that the answer to incidents like Virginia Tech is more guns on campus.How many national tragedy's before some attempt is made to remedy this situation...I don't have the answers,hell I don't even know all the right questions...all I know is far too many of our fellow citizens fall in front of these weapons..


You don't have the answers because you are letting your emotions get in the way of seeing clearly. I'm not dissing you for it. It's an understandable human emotion, especially if you have had personal experiences which you find troubling.

However, as I said before, anecdotal experiences shouldn't be the basis for the resolution of the problem.

I do believe that more guns on the U of VT campus would have prevented many deaths.

Every hear of the Appalachian School of Law shooting?

According to Bridges, at the first sound of gunfire, he and fellow student Mikael Gross, unbeknownst to each other, ran to their vehicles to fetch their personal owned firearms.[6] Gross, a police officer with the Grifton Police Department in his home state of North Carolina, retrieved a 9 mm pistol and body armor.[7] Bridges, a county sheriff's deputy from Asheville, N.C.,[8] pulled his .357 Magnum pistol from beneath the driver's seat of his Chevrolet Tahoe. As Bridges later told the Richmond Times Dispatch, he was prepared to shoot to kill.[9] Bridges and Gross approached Odighizuwa from different angles, with Bridges yelling at Odighizuwa to drop his gun.[10] Odighizuwa then dropped his firearm and was subdued by several other unarmed students, including Ted Besen and Todd Ross.[11]
Firm




slvemike4u -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 8:08:36 PM)

There is no discussion to be had with any that think more guns on our campus's is the answer.BTW the example you cite is a case of 2 LEO happening to be on the scene...I am willing to concede armed law enforcement officers is a good thing...well meaning civilians pulling their personal weapons is another matter.




Alumbrado -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 8:49:39 PM)

I can't help but reflect on the fact that schoolyard shootings were not only so rare that they were usually recorded as a zero because the incident per 1000,000 students ratio was such a small fraction of 1% that it got rounded down...and that those miniscule numbers were dropping...

Yet instead of doing something to eliminate even the vestiges of such things, the media and the politicians declared an 'epidemic' where there was none, created a feeding frenzy, padded the numbers and obessessed over the few actual incidents until they looked like widespread frequent occurences, profitted from tragedy, and now we have finally, an upward  trend of copy cat killers wanting to go out in a blaze of glory like Columbine, et al.

Not my idea of good going.   And not a sound basis for policies to actually reduce such events.




slvemike4u -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 8:58:44 PM)

Al how we got here is hardly the point .The issue IMO is how many of these incidents have to happen before the need to reevaluate the gun culture in this country is seen.
And Firm if I sound emotional when discussing the murder and mayhem visited on inocents it is because I am.




Alumbrado -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 9:15:42 PM)

 
Ignoring history as 'hardly the point' is pretty much the whole point. The increase of schoolyard and other such shootings is a manufactured crisis.... manufactured by hyping it to the point where it becomes irresistible to disturbed minds.

That some people are willing to accept fresh innocent victims as 'the cost of doing business' bothers me..whether that business is journalism, or politics, is immaterial.





hardbodysub -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 9:20:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

This kind of shit seems to occur every couple of months or so. It sucks, but it's an obvious consequence of a liberal gun policy. *Shrug*. I'm getting jaded, not out of being cruel, but out of the lack of action over what, to me, would be an obvious start to a solution to this problem: at least, regulate and monitor gun ownership a little bit more. 


Not to get off track, but do you honestly believe that even if we were able to remove all legally owned guns from the world, that gun violence would end?


That's obviously the wrong question. Obviously, nobody thinks that the disappearance of illegal guns would end all gun violence. But would it prevent some gun violence? Absolutely. Would it prevent a significant amount? Maybe.




slvemike4u -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 9:22:29 PM)

I take your point Al,but the fact remains ,media creation or not,manufactured or not, it is a problem and just the most visible...work place shootings are part of the conversation too.The fact is one well armed unhinged individual all too often can all too easily cut a path thru a building leaving dead bodies in his wake. I for one am tired of hearing nothing can be done to address this issue.If that makes me a hand wringer so be it,,,




hardbodysub -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 9:24:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

And Thadius if nothing is done who explains it to the parents of the children yet to die.I am fully aware that all tragedy's can not be averted,but my skin crawls when the argument is put forth that the answer to incidents like Virginia Tech is more guns on campus.How many national tragedy's before some attempt is made to remedy this situation...I don't have the answers,hell I don't even know all the right questions...all I know is far too many of our fellow citizens fall in front of these weapons..


You don't have the answers because you are letting your emotions get in the way of seeing clearly. I'm not dissing you for it. It's an understandable human emotion, especially if you have had personal experiences which you find troubling.

However, as I said before, anecdotal experiences shouldn't be the basis for the resolution of the problem.

I do believe that more guns on the U of VT campus would have prevented many deaths.

Every hear of the Appalachian School of Law shooting?

According to Bridges, at the first sound of gunfire, he and fellow student Mikael Gross, unbeknownst to each other, ran to their vehicles to fetch their personal owned firearms.[6] Gross, a police officer with the Grifton Police Department in his home state of North Carolina, retrieved a 9 mm pistol and body armor.[7] Bridges, a county sheriff's deputy from Asheville, N.C.,[8] pulled his .357 Magnum pistol from beneath the driver's seat of his Chevrolet Tahoe. As Bridges later told the Richmond Times Dispatch, he was prepared to shoot to kill.[9] Bridges and Gross approached Odighizuwa from different angles, with Bridges yelling at Odighizuwa to drop his gun.[10] Odighizuwa then dropped his firearm and was subdued by several other unarmed students, including Ted Besen and Todd Ross.[11]
Firm


Evidently, you believe that anecdotal experiences shouldn't be the basis for the resolution of the problem, ... that is, unless the anecdote supports your view. Then, it's a great idea.




Alumbrado -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 9:32:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

I take your point Al,but the fact remains ,media creation or not,manufactured or not, it is a problem and just the most visible...work place shootings are part of the conversation too.The fact is one well armed unhinged individual all too often can all too easily cut a path thru a building leaving dead bodies in his wake. I for one am tired of hearing nothing can be done to address this issue.If that makes me a hand wringer so be it,,,


Oh, things can be done (note that I did not say easy things) to address the current situation regarding violence in society...that doesn't mean that we should let the people (media and politicians) who made the current situation worse, ignore those solutions, and carry their agendas into more irrational, unworkable policies.





slvemike4u -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 9:49:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

I take your point Al,but the fact remains ,media creation or not,manufactured or not, it is a problem and just the most visible...work place shootings are part of the conversation too.The fact is one well armed unhinged individual all too often can all too easily cut a path thru a building leaving dead bodies in his wake. I for one am tired of hearing nothing can be done to address this issue.If that makes me a hand wringer so be it,,,


Oh, things can be done (note that I did not say easy things) to address the current situation regarding violence in society...that doesn't mean that we should let the people (media and politicians) who made the current situation worse, ignore those solutions, and carry their agendas into more irrational, unworkable policies.


Al ,hell itself must have frozen over, we agree on something...




Alumbrado -> RE: Another church shooting (7/30/2008 9:57:28 PM)

I'm not surprised.[;)]




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875