DesFIP -> RE: what makes a "true Dom" (10/9/2008 6:37:50 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DMFParadox Very simply, a Dom is someone who is sexually stimulated by the demonstration of obedience by their partner. There's more to it; there's skill in attaining and maintaining that obedience, for example, and sadism plays a role sometimes. But that's the simplest definition that I'd accept as completely true. For someone to not be a 'true Dom', to me, would mean that person does not feel more sexual when being obeyed. Their heart's not in it. They want to be obeyed only because then they can use that obedience to attain sex; not for the sake of the obedience itself. I am one who is quickly and visibly turned on by obedience and succor. Especially the unexpected, little victories, turn me on. That's why I identify as a Dom. I apologize for my earlier post, because I was analyzing the reasons why I think Doms exist; not what they are. Regards, Paradox Now this I disagree with. Besides it sets up the corollary that a sub is someone who is sexually aroused by being ordered around. Do you get hot if you drive through McDonalds and order a Big Mac? What if she doesn't get hot when you tell her to iron your blue shirt? Besides all that, some of us are obedience wired and some aren't. For some, what does it for them is service, having someone come by and mow the lawn gets their dominant juices flowing. And then there are those of us whose switch is turned on by emotional transparency. He would much rather have me strip myself nude and present to him my fears, my insecurities etc than have me go straight to doing what he says. Me giving him my authentic self, the self I keep hidden and protected, knowing he's the only one who ever gets that just flat out does it for him. And knowing he's the only one I can do this with while being 100 percent sure I am safe in so doing, is what does it for me.
|
|
|
|