Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Grammatical annoyances


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: Grammatical annoyances Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Grammatical annoyances - 8/2/2008 9:22:03 AM   
Roselaure


Posts: 672
Joined: 4/12/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BlueSpirit


Does an artist have to use paint the same way as another? Wouldn’t we consider that a kind of tedium?
Strict rules stifle innovation.
 


That's a valid argument, but a different one.  You said originally "The point of language is to get an idea across, the rest is just fluff."  I was responding to that. 

I have no objection to a skilled writer stretching  or even breaking the rules for the sake of creativity.  He knows the rules and breaks them for the sake of art.  Creativity is no excuse however for ignorance of your chosen medium, IMO.





_____________________________

Once conform, once do what other people do because they do it, and lethargy steals over all the finer nerves and faculties of the soul.
-Virginia Woolf

(in reply to BlueSpirit)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Grammatical annoyances - 8/2/2008 9:23:32 AM   
sunshinemiss


Posts: 17673
Joined: 11/26/2007
Status: offline
 
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyRainfire

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shadow-tiger

I have been recently reminded of another annoyance. When people use lol in sentences in such a way that it takes on a form akin to the word stop in telegrams.

Ship has hit an iceberg lol Not enough life boats for everybody lol Send help fast lol

I hardly ever see the other forms such as rofl and fdl either. Kids on the internet these days, no sense of what acronyms are good for!


I read this post and then shortly afterwards saw a post on another thread where "LOL" was used in this exact manner. I lost it, I couldn't stop laughing for 5 minutes.   And still giggle when I think about it.



That's just mean LRF.... saying that and not sharing the giggle with us grammar geeks.  Come on!!!!!!  what thread?  Hmmm?  I'll give you a cookie if you tell.

_____________________________

Yes, I am a wonton hussy... and still sweet as 3.14

(in reply to LadyRainfire)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Grammatical annoyances - 8/2/2008 9:25:50 AM   
sirsholly


Posts: 42360
Joined: 9/7/2007
From: Quietville
Status: offline
let's not forget those who end every sentence with hehe. 

_____________________________

PICKED UPON
TECHNO-DOLT
MEMBER OF THE SUBBIE MAFIA
GRACEFULLY CHALLENGED :::::splat:::::
BOOT WHORE
VAA/S FAN

GIVES GOOD HEART (Lushy)

CREATOR OF MAYHEM (practice)


(in reply to sunshinemiss)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Grammatical annoyances - 8/2/2008 9:26:39 AM   
sunshinemiss


Posts: 17673
Joined: 11/26/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Roselaure

quote:

ORIGINAL: BlueSpirit


Does an artist have to use paint the same way as another? Wouldn’t we consider that a kind of tedium?
Strict rules stifle innovation.
 


That's a valid argument, but a different one.  You said originally "The point of language is to get an idea across, the rest is just fluff."  I was responding to that. 

I have no objection to a skilled writer stretching  or even breaking the rules for the sake of creativity.  He knows the rules and breaks them for the sake of art.  Creativity is no excuse however for ignorance of your chosen medium, IMO.



amen.

*hands you a cookie

_____________________________

Yes, I am a wonton hussy... and still sweet as 3.14

(in reply to Roselaure)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Grammatical annoyances - 8/2/2008 9:31:39 AM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Well, unless you deny that the sentences "We proactively invaded Iraq" and "We actively invaded Iraq" mean two very different things, you can't say that "proactive" is redundant.

The opposite of "active" is "passive."  The opposite of "proactive" would be "reactive" or "retroactive."

quote:

ORIGINAL: Roselaure

"Rather than just REacting".  Right.  Acting.  "Proactive" is not necessary. 

I'm just geeky enough to love talking about this sort of thing.

(in reply to Roselaure)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Grammatical annoyances - 8/2/2008 12:42:36 PM   
Roselaure


Posts: 672
Joined: 4/12/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Well, unless you deny that the sentences "We proactively invaded Iraq" and "We actively invaded Iraq" mean two very different things, you can't say that "proactive" is redundant.

The opposite of "active" is "passive."  The opposite of "proactive" would be "reactive" or "retroactive."

quote:

ORIGINAL: Roselaure

"Rather than just REacting".  Right.  Acting.  "Proactive" is not necessary. 

I'm just geeky enough to love talking about this sort of thing.



I do deny that those two sentences mean very different things.  The opposite of "active" is both "passive" and "reactive".  It's just that when presented with a dilemma one can do three different things, act, react or do nothing. 

Are you saying that before the coinage of the word "proactive"  that "reactive" had no opposite?

I fear that I'm becoming the "grammatical annoyance" referred to in the OP!

< Message edited by Roselaure -- 8/2/2008 12:44:54 PM >


_____________________________

Once conform, once do what other people do because they do it, and lethargy steals over all the finer nerves and faculties of the soul.
-Virginia Woolf

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Grammatical annoyances - 8/2/2008 12:51:46 PM   
Shadow-tiger


Posts: 1775
Joined: 6/8/2008
From: California
Status: offline
Gah! Why is it that proactive automatically translates to preemptive in my mind when used by governments? I do not think that word means what they think it means.

_____________________________

Just some guy (profile)
Just a tiny bit evil
My kind of love song

(in reply to Roselaure)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Grammatical annoyances - 8/2/2008 3:34:54 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
"We proactively invaded Iraq" means that we invaded before they had a chance to do anything about it.

"We actively invaded Iraq" means that we invaded with our own troops carrying out our own war strategy (such as it was); in other words, we did not merely support an invasion or fight a war by proxy.

(in reply to Shadow-tiger)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Grammatical annoyances - 8/2/2008 8:46:33 PM   
Emperor1956


Posts: 2370
Joined: 11/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

There is a saying:

Those that like to show themselves to be an authority on grammar and spelling often do so because they are an authority on nothing else.

The point of language is to get an idea across, the rest is just fluff.


Ahhh, how true.  That is why I have garnered innumerable submissives with the catchy call phrase:

F U CN RD THS I WLL WHP YR AZ!

--E

_____________________________

"When you wake up, Pooh," said Piglet, "what's the first thing you say?"
"What's for breakfast? What do you say, Piglet?"
"I say, I wonder what's going to happen exciting today?"
Pooh nodded thoughtfully.
"It's the same thing," he said.

(in reply to BlueSpirit)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Grammatical annoyances - 8/2/2008 9:46:26 PM   
seababy


Posts: 845
Joined: 6/20/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Shadow-tiger

This being the internet and people being what they are I often see a great number of gramatical mistakes that make me wince. But this isn't about those people, oh no. This is all about me Me ME!!!

Personally I have this habit of reuising the same word multiple times in the same sentence. Or reusing similar sentence constructs. Repeating, and things like that. About half the time I catch myself at it, and the rest of the time I simply groan and get on with life. Yet it's a niggling little detail that drives me crazy for no good reason. Stupid perfectionist!

So anyone else have a niggling habit like that?



John Norman?

(in reply to Shadow-tiger)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Grammatical annoyances - 8/3/2008 12:45:20 AM   
sunshinemiss


Posts: 17673
Joined: 11/26/2007
Status: offline
ooooooooo seababy,
That is funny! 

peace and passion,
sunshine

_____________________________

Yes, I am a wonton hussy... and still sweet as 3.14

(in reply to seababy)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Grammatical annoyances - 8/3/2008 1:10:35 AM   
X656X


Posts: 5
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline
What are you going to do tonight? or What are you doing tonight? - Please explain?

(in reply to sunshinemiss)
Profile   Post #: 92
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: Grammatical annoyances Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078