RE: Real/True Statements

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Real/True Statements

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Real/True Statements

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 5 [6]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Real/True Statements - 1/7/2006 6:59:15 PM

truesub4u

Posts: 2949
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Petruchio

quote:

you're screwed....well least you could do is kiss... if gonna screw... lol

Mmm, kisses I can do.

I should of known.... LMAO

(in reply to Petruchio)

Profile

Post #: 101

RE: Real/True Statements - 1/7/2006 7:41:14 PM

mstrcorky

Posts: 8
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kyraofMists

Actually, if I was single and actively searching for a dominant, I would not want to read that they thought they were real or true. I would much prefer them to tell me their character strengths, their values and morals, what type of relationship they are looking for, their view on the lifestyle, etc. Telling me that they think they are real or true doesn't really give me any information about them at all.

kyraofMists, I agree totally with what you say here. As we, on here, do anything from filling out our profiles to chatting on these boards or sending private messages - we are (hopefully) showing others what we are like and what we are all about.

I, personally, do not refer to myself as Real. In part, because I do not have to. You radiate what you are - whether you mean to or not - and I don't find the need to comment on it.

My beef with the "True" or "Real" issue is that in one swift motion, you validate one group while completely invalidating those who do not live up to whatever set of standards. Is someone who is not (or can not be) "True" or "Real" any less of an individual because they don't meet someone's definition?

And, if someone isn't "Real" or "True" ... what are they? Unreal? Fake? False?
I don't think so...

_____________________________

Master Corky
http://alittlepain.blogspot.com/
http://home.comast.net/~corkymcg/Leather

(in reply to kyraofMists)

Profile

Post #: 102

RE: Real/True Statements - 1/7/2006 8:01:04 PM

Petruchio

Posts: 1615
Joined: 2/6/2005
Status: offline

quote:

I should of known.... LMAO

Sneaky sub: I suspect you knew before you ever asked!

(in reply to truesub4u)

Profile

Post #: 103

RE: Real/True Statements - 1/9/2006 11:27:04 PM

carolsea

Posts: 185
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: North Carolina
Status: offline

trusub said: If looking for real or true, would you not want someone to state that they at least thought they were true or real in their own minds? In order to have someone be true or real to you, should they not be true or real to themselves?

And I say, as I said before, 10/14/2005 10:24:13 PM: Don't you just love the way so many people try to tell you what a true master (or true sub) is? They are trying to fit others into their own mold and idea of what that is, when it seems to me that the truth is only within ourselves. When we are true to ourselves, our philosophies, our needs, and what *we* determine to be true, then we are that true master or true submissive. What we seek, then, is the true counterpart to what we have become.

And only we... and that other person... can really define what that is.

That being said, doesn't it stand to reason that we BOTH have to believe that the other person is true or real? So even if the other person thinks they are (which many would doubt if they have to state so in their name), what really matters is whether we agree with them? If they think so, and we do not, then in our mind, they ARE not. Only what we believe is true, is true for US.

Make sense?

Carolsea

(in reply to kyraofMists)

Profile

Post #: 104

RE: Real/True Statements - 1/10/2006 5:32:29 AM

MysticalPhoenix

Posts: 212
Joined: 11/30/2005
From: Kelloggsville, Vanilla County MI
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mstrcorky

My beef with the "True" or "Real" issue is that in one swift motion, you validate one group while completely invalidating those who do not live up to whatever set of standards. Is someone who is not (or can not be) "True" or "Real" any less of an individual because they don't meet someone's definition?

It's like saying "I'm more real/true than they are, nanner nanner boo boo :P." And isn't collarme for adults?

I think it's best to leave the search for Truth and Reality to the philosophers.

_____________________________

---------------------------------------------------------
Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are.

(in reply to mstrcorky)

Profile

Post #: 105

RE: Real/True Statements - 1/10/2006 11:35:34 AM

LATEXBABY64

Posts: 2107
Joined: 4/8/2004
Status: offline

i love the last statment you said few really know what they are that is true i have decided i will nolonger give to someone who is not about growth into what is being built between two no the rest of the world real is this you have two eyes you have a mind you have heart well some do you have a spiirt try doing the right things in lfie this lifestyle has become twised muk of crap
cults work the same way feed ya full lies and beleifs that you have to be or do something a certian way here is what i say do what you want so long as it does not harm anyone eles mentally or physically have fun even if someone says something is consensual may not always be

(in reply to MysticalPhoenix)

Profile

Post #: 106