NumberSix
Posts: 1378
Joined: 12/30/2006 Status: offline
|
Shall we go on.... what. Trying desperately to change the subject? quote: Hmmm... I thought those supporting Obama would jump all over this chance to discuss policy and issues. The answer to that question here is the same as the answer there though - obviously not. _____________________________ quote:
ORIGINAL: bipolarber Yup... leaving responsibly. Which is the word you have to use when your political opponents accuse you of just "cutting and running." Measured pullout. Within the 16 month timeline the Maliki government has demanded. (Which even the Bush administration has adopted, only they call it a "time horizion" so as not to appear to be the two faced weasles they are.) Which, I might add, was first discussed when candidate Obama was on his Iraq visit, which John McCain suggested (nay, demanded) he take. Why do you suppose Malaki waited until then to ask for the pull out? You don't suppose he's learned that you don't get anywhere dealing with Bush/McCain, and their ilk, do you? Thanks for the concern over our "wound", but like a narrow minded, straight vanilla at a play party where you don't belong, it appears you got squicked out by a little blood play.... :) And there is your policy discussion, an answer to the original question of position, laid back at your feet in a little less annoying language than the OP, and a little less partisanship.......... But we thought we were discussing policy. The ones you imagine we have, and the ones we have. Or did they have fishsticks at the cafeteria on the day they were redefining words such as rhetoric, adversarial. policy and the like and I missed it? Ron
_____________________________
"Who are you?" "The new Number Two." "Who is Number One?" "You are Number Six.". "I am not a number — I am a free man!" Be seeing you...
|