xXLithiumXx
Posts: 723
Joined: 9/2/2008 From: Hell, Kentucky Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: lronitulstahp quote:
ORIGINAL: kittinSol quote:
ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy So, the question is can a man named Barrak Hussian Obama get more white people to vote for him, then will vote for man named John Sidney McCain III? You're underestimating your compatriots. sigh...actually, he isn't. But that's beside the point. Now it's his NAME that's the problem, so the earlier statements saying a black man...will we edit all those to say a man named Obama? Iquote:
didn't invent the issue. It came from Black communites. Hilliary Clinton was all to happy to pick it up and play up to her black supporters and for it worked for her.You can find black scholars and laymen all over the internet talking about with nary a white person in or on the site. Mainstream debate? How about Time Magazine: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1584736,00.html It first came to my attention via the brilliant critic and writer Stanley Crouch when he wrote this column in The New York Daily News: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1730861/posts Crouch ended that column (written two years ago) with this: " if he [Obama] throws his hat in the ring, he will have to run as the son of a white woman and an African immigrant. If we then end up with him as our first black President, he will have come into the White House through a side door - which might, at this point, be the only one that's open." That is exactly what happened at least the first part. The second part is in great doubt at the moment. Oh...i forgot about the day all us black people got together on Mt.Sinai, and accepted the tenets written on tablets that were given to Stanley Crouch from on high. One black person or even 1000, have not been made spokespeople for all. Since slavery, and the habitual raping of black female slaves by white slave owners, there's been the "how black are you?" debate going on in this country. Shame on Crouch and those of his ilk, for questioning Sen.Obama's heritage. It shows a slightly warped loyalty to a systematic agenda used by others to oppress blacks for centuries. No wonder he's quotable. Sort of like saying David Duke, or Ann Coulter speak for all white people; it's narrowminded to think that he does. quote:
i can speak for a mixed race american. Well i can speak as a mixed race American. Race will play much too large a factor in people's disapproval of Obama as a candidate. quote:
quote: ORIGINAL: philosophy ...so you're suggesting that the majority of white people in the US are racist? If i did that you'd jump down my throat....... FatDomDaddy I am not saying that at all. I don't think the majority are racist at all but in 2008 they are not going to vote for the most liberal Presidential nominee in its history and the fact that he is back and has a middle eastern name isn't going to help it at all. Read your OP and the subsequent posts, please.You're backpedaling furiously, but i can understand why. When i see the ugliness of others with whom i feel a kinship, at times, i try to make sense out of it, and excuse their faults. Disillusionmnet is a bitter pill for any of us to swallow. I wondered if it was just me that saw the backpeadling. Im sure the racism that was stated was obvious from the start.
|