Owner59
Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006 From: Dirty Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: xBullx That good neighbor was an excellent rebuttle.... And quite civil... It will be interesting to see the counter... I love when party propaganda from either side is rebuked with "fact" and or "logic". If you can't tell I am slowly developing a disdain for party politics. I don`t know,I read the snopes and it repeated what has been reported... She wanted to remove(ban) books. What?That she wasn`t successful,so that matters? She went to the librarian three times to do this book banning.They said no. Did I miss something? I never heard which books were considered and I don`t care .It matters little what the titles were.I never saw a list and I don`t need to. That she even went there is enough to raise a red flag for me. I sure hope we don`t hear suggestions that we should just give book banning a chance,just to see what happens.Or "what`s the harm in banning a few books,there`s tons of books left over,read them instead..... " This just fits into the pro-active fundie pattern. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O430vJrXWS8 So who`s going to live in Alaska,..... in the end times? If Sarah would let me crash at her place,I am so there. ~~~~~ I`ll take back what I said about her firing the librarian.The jury`s out on that one. And I`ll take the supposed real story about what happened and slip this issue out of the "abuse of power" column and slip it into the "incompetence" column.The story of how she handled the supposed "budget inspired firings" is a real doozy and doesn`t make her look good at all. What would she do as POTUS or VP? I`m amused by the desperate comments.Funny,it`s the Palinites who seem to be defensive and desperate. I just heard that McCain is now calling himself an agent of change. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVIaqCjvLpU Mavericks....... You gotta be kidding? The new ad contains a lie, that was debunked a week ago. Sarah was for the "Bridge To Nowhere",wayyyy before she pretended to be against it. She was for the earmarks.Now they claim she isn`t. This isn`t semantics. Why are they lying about her opposision to earmarks? added for Bita, The filing of the complaint against herself, is a stonewalling maneuver. It`s an effort to have everything postponed a couple months, till after the election. If you think about the way a criminal thinks,it makes sence. They are doing anything and saying anything at this point. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When we were1st introduced to this woman ,we heard simultaneous chest beating and self -back-patting. OMG she`s the bomb,this,that and the other thing.Oh,...the "investigation"... Oh that`s nothing,we heard.Oh,....she`s cooperating and wants things to come out,cus she`s innocent .....Oh,it`ll over in a couple weeks,no big deal. Well Bita,they are trying to quash the investigation and any action concerning "troopergate",with her filing against herself. It`s called stonewalling by any other name ,they are desparate to make this abuse of power thing go away.
< Message edited by Owner59 -- 9/8/2008 8:14:14 PM >
_____________________________
"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals" President Obama
|