RE: Pakistan border and US forces (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Sanity -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/18/2008 8:24:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
I'm not after a daily kick at the US, I'm after getting at the warmongers and showing their arguments to be dangerous and irrational.


That's why you do it... you're "getting at the warmongers."

Why then don't you so vociferously attack the European allies who are also patrolling Afghanistan in your every other post? Or do you only despise American "war mongers." And does al-Qaeda figure in as war mongers in your book, since they made an attack on innocents on soil that was foreign to them?


quote:

Muhammad was a man of his times which was the sixth century AD and since faith and superstition ruled the lives of people at that time and had not been challenged by rational thought, he was forward looking, more violent than some, less violent  than others. The idea of someone being s freedom fighter probably didn't exist in the sixth century, one wasn't free, one was ruled by god or the gods depending on where you lived. So no, he wasn't a freedom fighter which is a modern term.


That sounds little different from the lifestyles and beliefs of those living in the tribal regions of Pakistan today or, more particularly, of the Taliban.


quote:

However, if you are talking about the terrorists that are fighting today, you could argue they are since they are fighting for a world they believe in which is every bit as real as Bush's and all the terrorists and Bush are doing, is reinforcing each other's view of the world.



But do you believe that they're fighting for freedom. Even in their own minds?

Do you think that if the United States ceased to exist that al-Qaeda would turn into a peace-loving society overnight? Or would they continue to blow up Muslims at night clubs and Jews and other infidels...


quote:

It only seems to be the Republicans that equate being anti-war as being anti-American. That might have something to do with their vision of America, not what America actually is.


What do you know about being an American? And what does that rant have to do with the topic or the subject.




meatcleaver -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/18/2008 9:29:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
I'm not after a daily kick at the US, I'm after getting at the warmongers and showing their arguments to be dangerous and irrational.


That's why you do it... you're "getting at the warmongers."

Why then don't you so vociferously attack the European allies who are also patrolling Afghanistan in your every other post? Or do you only despise American "war mongers." And does al-Qaeda figure in as war mongers in your book, since they made an attack on innocents on soil that was foreign to them?


You obviously don't read my posts. I said after 9/11, I like the rest of the world beleived the US had every right to go after the perptrators of that event and those that sheltered them. I also said the west should take on board the historical reasons why the west is so hated in that region of the world. It was Bush who changed the goalposts by invading Iraq on a lie and now, intstead of adopting a rational strategy is lashing out at allies because his flawed  and irrational strategy in the region isn't working.

As for Britain in Iraq, I have said many times that Blair should be indicted for war crimes and that Britain should be held to account for its part in an illegal invasion. The other European countries have metaphorically just sent stretcher bearers to Afghanistan so Bush can say he's got an international alliance. Only Britain is in any way committed to the war on terror and that is because for some reason, Britain feels naked without its American allie.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

However, if you are talking about the terrorists that are fighting today, you could argue they are since they are fighting for a world they believe in which is every bit as real as Bush's and all the terrorists and Bush are doing, is reinforcing each other's view of the world.



But do you believe that they're fighting for freedom. Even in their own minds?


Yes, I do believe they in their own minds believe they are fighting for freedom to live like they want to.

Not what I call freedom but freedom is what someone defines freedom to be.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Do you think that if the United States ceased to exist that al-Qaeda would turn into a peace-loving society overnight? Or would they continue to blow up Muslims at night clubs and Jews and other infidels...



No, that is not their nature but it is for them to find their own way and its not up to the west.

The reason for Palestinian terrorism is completely different to Al Qaeda terrorism. The Palestinians are genuinely fighting for freedom in the western sense of the term. The west's foreign policies are pushing different groups that happen to be muslim together into an unholy alliance. If the US had a balanced policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, they would be more likely to solve the conflict and remove several terrorist groups out of the equation straight away. The Palestinians have often said they want peace but it had to be peace with justice to make it work.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
quote:

It only seems to be the Republicans that equate being anti-war as being anti-American. That might have something to do with their vision of America, not what America actually is.


What do you know about being an American? And what does that rant have to do with the topic or the subject.



Just having spent time in America, listening and reading about American politics, talking to American friends. The fact that there are American forces and installations in my country and my country is a war allie with the US and Bush pursuing a policy that is destabilizing the region and neighbouring regions gives me a right to be interested I think.  If there wasn't any American troops and installations here or in the region, I suppose Americans right or left would be justified in telling me to mind my own business.




Vendaval -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/18/2008 11:30:11 AM)

Do you mean "we" as in American military or "we" as in Western Europeans and the Crusades?  And where do the aforementioned videos fit into this historical context?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Sure. They've been recruiting their "freedom fighters" for centuries... and we haven't been around for that long.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

Do you have evidence that the videos mentioned below or demonizing Jews will create just as many dedicated terrorists as killing civilians or the militants?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Killing their leaders is merely their current poster child for recruitment. If we're not killing their leaders they will use a Madonna video with equally good results. Or video of night club action... or they'll demonize Jews.






Sanity -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/18/2008 3:23:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

Do you mean "we" as in American military or "we" as in Western Europeans and the Crusades?


The context of the discussion is "we" as in us horrible blood-thirsty dirty rotten savage warmongering Americans, but in my opinion, I'd say prior to the crusades as well. Back to right around 624 AD, in fact.


quote:


 And where do the aforementioned videos fit into this historical context?



The Madonna video I mentioned is but an example, Vendeval. An illustration.

If our soldiers aren't at the forefront of al-Qaeda propaganda, no matter - their radical clerics have no shortage of evils to attribute to any people who don't belong to their particular branch of Islam.





Sanity -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/20/2008 5:21:55 PM)


Here you go, Politesub - Islamic Militants busily winning hearts and minds...

quote:

Suicide blast devastates hotel in Pakistan

At least 40 killed at Marriott that is popular with foreigners in capital

SLAMABAD, Pakistan - A huge suicide truck bomb devastated the heavily guarded Marriott Hotel in Pakistan's capital Saturday, killing at least 40 people and engulfing the building in flames in a sickening reminder of the threat in a country vital to the U.S.-led war on terrorism.

Officials said at least 250 people were injured, NBC News reported. Two hospitals said 10 foreigners were among those in their treatment, including one each from Germany, Saudi Arabia, Morocco and Afghanistan.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26803768/




NumberSix -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/20/2008 6:54:26 PM)

If one thinks that Al Queda was at some point in Iraq, (which it likely was once we invaded) and we see where we are in afghanistan today, and we were to withdraw to Turkey and the kurdish territories, and thereby insure that that hole is plugged you are left with one of two observations, we should bomb the shit out of the Hindu Kush, or..........they are waltzing thru Iran. 

What is the sound of two hands clapping?

Ku, Fu Chi, Sui, Ka.

What are you prepared to do?

Why were you not prepared to do it at the outset.

Saddam was not the issue.

Lao Tzu and Carl von Clausewitz in tandem.





farglebargle -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/20/2008 7:13:02 PM)

Hey, this reminds me.

WHERE ARE THE 9/11 PERPS? The Saudis who planned and financed the 9/11 hijackings?

It would have been nice to see them in Federal Court, wouldn't it?





Politesub53 -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 4:40:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Here you go, Politesub - Islamic Militants busily winning hearts and minds...



This is beneath you. Firstly show me where i have ever said terrorism is okay. Secondly, it does nothing to disprove my point about the killing of innocent civillians. Not unless you think the later is acceptable ?




Sanity -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 7:49:00 AM)

Why do you take so much offense, Politesub? I never suggested that you that you think terrorism is okay even if you do seem to take the position that their actions are often justified.

You're the one who is suggesting that sort of primitive attitude about me when you post:

quote:


Secondly, it does nothing to disprove my point about the killing of innocent civillians. Not unless you think the later is acceptable ?


My point in posting the snippets from the above article was only meant to underscore the point that the "militants" who the United States are fighting are constantly blowing up innocent Muslim civilians, and our killing these "militant" leaders may not be quite the recruiting tool for them that you think it is.

As for your lamenting America's "killing of innocent civilians" kdsub put it better than I ever could in post 71 above:

quote:

In real war civilians get killed....sad but unavoidable...BUT You are a real guppy if you believe all the propaganda and false reports the enemy puts out to influence gullible people.

We do not indiscriminately target and kill innocents. In fact we are the only warring nation that ever gave a crap about non-combatants.

Don’t you think it’s little…tiny…weenie suspicious that we only kill women and children….and only hit wedding parties… and Never Ever any combatants?











meatcleaver -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 8:08:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

My point in posting the snippets from the above article was only meant to underscore the point that the "militants" who the United States are fighting are constantly blowing up innocent Muslim civilians, and our killing these "militant" leaders may not be quite the recruiting tool for them that you think it is.

As for your lamenting America's "killing of innocent civilians" kdsub put it better than I ever could in post 71 above:



quote:

In real war civilians get killed....sad but unavoidable...BUT You are a real guppy if you believe all the propaganda and false reports the enemy puts out to influence gullible people.

We do not indiscriminately target and kill innocents. In fact we are the only warring nation that ever gave a crap about non-combatants.

Don’t you think it’s little…tiny…weenie suspicious that we only kill women and children….and only hit wedding parties… and Never Ever any combatants?


To think the conflict in Pakistan is about religion is a stupid one. Pakistan is tribal, even its government depends on tribal allegiences. The idea that Pakistan just because on the surface is a democracy, doesn't mean it is a democracy in the western sense. The conflict in Pakistan is about the 'haves' and the 'have nots' and the ideologues are using the inate injustices of Pakistan for their own ends. The west is unwittlying supporting the 'haves' against the 'have nots' ie. the US and the west is seen in the tribal areas to support the people that keep them in poverty.

As for the reports of civilians deaths being propaganda, they aren't. NATO accepts just about all the reported killings of civilians and if they didn't, there is plenty of news footage and independent witnesses to prove them.





Sanity -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 8:27:00 AM)

Let me see if I've got this straight:

You're claiming that al-Qaeda killed or injured around 300 random Pakistanis yesterday as part of their Nobel-worthy efforts to help out Pakistan's "have-nots".

And we should always believe every bit of propaganda that terrorists put out.

That about sum it up?



quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
To think the conflict in Pakistan is about religion is a stupid one. Pakistan is tribal, even its government depends on tribal allegiences. The idea that Pakistan just because on the surface is a democracy, doesn't mean it is a democracy in the western sense. The conflict in Pakistan is about the 'haves' and the 'have nots' and the ideologues are using the inate injustices of Pakistan for their own ends. The west is unwittlying supporting the 'haves' against the 'have nots' ie. the US and the west is seen in the tribal areas to support the people that keep them in poverty.

As for the reports of civilians deaths being propaganda, they aren't. NATO accepts just about all the reported killings of civilians and if they didn't, there is plenty of news footage and independent witnesses to prove them.






meatcleaver -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 8:33:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Let me see if I've got this straight:

You're claiming that al-Qaeda killed or injured around 300 random Pakistanis yesterday as part of their Nobel-worthy efforts to help out Pakistan's "have-nots".

And we should always believe every bit of propaganda that terrorists put out.

That about sum it up?



Is English your first language?  I'm saying the Taliban and Al Qaeda are taking advantage of the the extreme social injustices that exist in Pakistan for their own ends. It would be easier to get rid of the social injustices than to help the Taliban recruit more through aggravating the grievances that already exist there.

The killing of hundreds of civilians isn't propaganda, its a fact. NATO accepts it as a fact, and it is well documented by many respected human rights organisations.




Sanity -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 8:54:29 AM)


Nobody is denying that innocents are sometimes accidentally killed in war, or even that NATO is aware of that fact, but you seem to be suggesting that every piece of related al-Qaeda propaganda is flawless and perfect truth, and such a claim would be ridiculous.

And your haves vs. have-nots angle isn't applicable in the tribal regions of Pakistan. They've been living just as they are right now for centuries... your attempt to assert that al-Qaeda's attacks are based on anything other than religion is a desperate sort of logic. Al-Qaeda isn't a socialist organization fighting Capitalism, not at all.

America sends all kinds of aid into that region and, while I'm sure you'll find a way to spin our aid packages to them as something evil, I'm highly doubtful that the people receiving all that aid will ever agree with you.









FirmhandKY -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 8:57:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

You obviously don't read my posts.


Well, I pretty much don't either, since I can anticipate about 100% of the time what you are going to say.

What intrigues me is that Sanity actually has the patience to wade through all of your ... stuff.

Firm




meatcleaver -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 9:06:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Nobody is denying that innocents are sometimes accidentally killed in war, or even that NATO is aware of that fact, but you seem to be suggesting that every piece of related al-Qaeda propaganda is flawless and perfect truth, and such a claim would be ridiculous.



Where have I said that? The verified and accepted figures for last month were around 350 civilians, for this month it is around 200, not including the wedding party of 90 in Pakistan which has also been verified. The Taliban has no need to exaggerate those numbers because they are so bad.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

And your haves vs. have-nots angle isn't applicable in the tribal regions of Pakistan. They've been living just as they are right now for centuries... your attempt to assert that al-Qaeda's attacks are based on anything other than religion is a desperate sort of logic. Al-Qaeda isn't a socialist organization fighting Capitalism, not at all.



I said Al Qaeda is taking advantage of political and social grievances which is what NATO and the Afghan Pakistani governments accept, which is why even the British government said, without addressing the socio-political problems the war is unwinnable. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

America sends all kinds of aid into that region and, while I'm sure you'll find a way to spin our aid packages to them as something evil, I'm highly doubtful that the people receiving all that aid will ever agree with you.



Aid to the central governments rarely gets to the places where the grievances are because of corruption. Basically, the US and NATO are pissing into the wind by supporting sympathetic governments and the reason the governments are sympathic to the west and particularly to the US is because the US is the money tap.




meatcleaver -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 9:16:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

You obviously don't read my posts.


Well, I pretty much don't either, since I can anticipate about 100% of the time what you are going to say.

What intrigues me is that Sanity actually has the patience to wade through all of your ... stuff.

Firm


That cuts both ways.




FirmhandKY -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 9:35:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

That cuts both ways.


*shrugs* Of course.

Firm




Sanity -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 9:40:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
Where have I said that? The verified and accepted figures for last month were around 350 civilians, for this month it is around 200, not including the wedding party of 90 in Pakistan which has also been verified. The Taliban has no need to exaggerate those numbers because they are so bad.


Verified and accepted by who?

Where do you get this "information"?

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

I said Al Qaeda is taking advantage of political and social grievances which is what NATO and the Afghan Pakistani governments accept, which is why even the British government said, without addressing the socio-political problems the war is unwinnable.


Al-Qaeda isn't "taking advantage" very effectively when they're busily killing so many of their fellow Muslims - which was my whole point from the beginning.

And socio-political problems? That almost sounds as if you're thinking of a certain super-wealthy tyrant who used golden toilets in his myriad gleaming mansions while his sons and his brutal regime funded terrorism and starved and raped, tortured and otherwise murdered his own people, and who started wars with neighboring countries...

Helluva guy. How do you think a problem like that could be effectively addressed?

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
Aid to the central governments rarely gets to the places where the grievances are because of corruption. Basically, the US and NATO are pissing into the wind by supporting sympathetic governments and the reason the governments are sympathic to the west and particularly to the US is because the US is the money tap.


See, I told you, you could do it!




Politesub53 -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 10:20:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Why do you take so much offense, Politesub? I never suggested that you that you think terrorism is okay even if you do seem to take the position that their actions are often justified.

You're the one who is suggesting that sort of primitive attitude about me when you post:



Find one post of mine where i have said terrorism is justified. Find one post of mine were i said the allies were wrong to go into Afghanistan.




Sanity -> RE: Pakistan border and US forces (9/21/2008 10:24:51 AM)

 
What else are you suggesting when you maintain along with meatcleaver that practically all we ever do is blow up children and wedding parties.

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2143901




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.125