CallaFirestormBW -> RE: How do I deal with something that was said to me but was innapropriate? (9/22/2008 6:18:48 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mistoferin Who in the name of all that is holy has time to babysit, handhold, monitor or wipe the drool off of the chin of their adult partner every waking minute of the day....and more importantly, why in the hell would anyone want to? Unless of course, it ensured that they always feel needed and keeps their position up there on the pedestal secure. To me it does not seem to fit what I think of as a power exchange relationship if there is no "power" on one end. It seems a lot more energy sucking....like a parasite on a host situation. Oh believe me, I understand the attraction of innocence and naivity can be cute once in a while...but I would starve in such a situation. I need the stimulation of someone who is intelligent, articulate and capable. I don't have time in my life or room in my head. This is one of the big decisions that has to be made in taking on s-types... 'Do I have the time, patience, etc., to be the d-type that will suit this relationship best?' Fortunately, though, even the neediest of s-types that I've encountered do fine once they have a solid structure on which to frame things, a plan for dealing with typical events, and the backup of their d-type to handle unexpected or problematic situations. Even as Chatelaine, I rarely had to spend extended time 'holding hands, wiping drool or following our most needy servants around', though I did have to monitor regularly to make sure that things didn't slip through the cracks... and my Keepers did me the same service, until they saw that I had things well in hand on my own. I think the only real difference is that, with our neediest s-types, there isn't the opportunity to let go after a while -- they need the framework on an ongoing basis, rather than just as an initial 'hint'. quote:
I guess it's a good thing that there are people in the world who like to be the "teachers" and the "coddlers" or I am sure there would be a lot of lonely people stumbling through life. But wow....I just can't imagine going through life with someone by my side who was more like an anchor than a sail. But in order to function, a boat needs both anchor and sail -- and sticking to the same analogy, I'd describe myself more as the rudder and anchor... my s-type may catch the breeze whichever way it blows (sail), but it is up to me to decide which way the wind will take us, or whether we will move at all. quote:
On a personal note, if someone has some sort of issue with me and sends someone else to fight that battle....they both go down a whole bunch of notches in my book. I don't have much respect for someone who can't come to me, eye to eye to discuss something that was obviously between us in the first place. I have even less respect for the savior who rushes in to threaten me or "persuade" me to change my perspective and most likely I would not give them the time of day, much less my actual attention. As for the OP's original situation....that man would be smart to pray that I DID ask my dominant to take care of it for me. He is much more fair and patient than myself. He'd still likely rip his balls off IF it came down to it whereas I probably wouldn't have the patience to wait until it did come down to it. And if that presents your authentic self, then nobody has the right to disdain your expression of that self. In the same way, though, someone whose reactions are just as authentic, but who prefers having someone else fight their battles or is profoundly yielding and bends to the structure defined by hir d-type as a matter of being is no less valid. However, if a person were to get pissed at me because xhe behaved inappropriately towards my s-type and I stepped up and defended my s-type, that's -hir- problem, not mine. My job is to attend to my responsibilities, and xhe'd be welcome to do hir worst, but xhe wouldn't see me back down from my responsibility just because -xhe- didn't like it. Calla Firestorm
|
|
|
|