Arpig -> RE: Does tribute equal being a hooker? (2/6/2006 10:54:03 AM)
|
For a slightly different perspective....when my pet and I were discussing our living arrangements, it was decided (mutually) that as my submissive she would surrender control of her money to me. What I did with that control was to establish rules.... #1. She was to start saving...she is young and has many years ahead of her to save for her old age (unlike me). #2. her savings would be kept seperate from mine #3. She was to make sure that our bills and rent and so on was paid. #4. Whatever was left over was mine to do what I want with. I have had access to her bank account for a long time, and the only times I have ever accessed it was to check her balance when she wanted to know it, and once to accept a money transfer that was sent to her, but she was unable to get to a computer to do so herself. Why did she give me this access? Well I suspect that on at least one level she got some satisfaction as a submissive by doing so, but mainly she did so because she trusts me. Could I abuse it? Yes of course I could. But giving yourself over for control, allowing another to have the power to abuse you if they chose to is the essence of submission. And accepting that power and not abusing is the essence of responsible domination. I agree that TPE involves everything, money, possessions, transfer of title to real estate...everything...it is total power exchange. That being said, there is nothing wrong with wanting something other than that, and equally there is nothing wrong with wanting that. And as to if tribute makes one a hooker....its still as simple as it was when i posted the answer a long while back in this thread. I attach no opprobrium to the term hooker, it is simply a word that describes a certain method of making money. I have no moral issue with that method, but for the sake of those who do have an issue with that word (political correctness is invading CM....a sad day indeed) i will use the term "sex-trade worker" (shortened to STW because I am lazy). If you require money/gifts in exchange for giving somebody sexual pleasure then you are a STW, regardless of the services rendered, or the legal definition of prostitution in your jurisdiction (in Canada prostitution itself is legal, its discussing the price that isn't "Communicating for the purposes of prostitution"... Its legal to pay somebody for sex, just not to ask them how much or to offer it...yeah I know...we have some VERY weird laws here). If you aren't happy with that fact, tough, it is still a fact. I have no problem with anybody being a STW, nor would my opinion of a person change if they were hooking (sorry, meant "working in the sex-trade"), I just have an issue with people trying to justify it, or disguise it. quote:
Please get your facts straight before you go about openly insulting women like myself who could tear you apart if need be. I do have my facts straight, and saying you are a STW is no more an insult than saying you are a person. It is simply a fact, and you choose to be insulted by it. I cannot control how you react to reality. And as to taking me apart....well dear girl, that really is no big accomplishment, I am pretty certain that the vast majority of people here on CM could do that, many with one or both hands tied behind their backs. I am glad for you that you live in a jurisdiction that allows you to do what you do legally, but just as what I do makes me a "help desk weenie", despite the fact that my title is actually "Advanced Technical Support Agent", what you call yourself in no way changes what you are. And again I emphasize, that to me there is no opprobrium attached to the term in my mind... what others read into it is beyond my control. Now lets all be happy...and those who get the tribute get to buy the next round...because as usual I am broke.
|
|
|
|