dreamysubmale
Posts: 204
Joined: 4/7/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Paulnz quote:
ORIGINAL: rexrgisformidoni I do believe Paulnz see's things from the point of view from a nation that has to import everything. The United States and The EU can out produce the world into the ground, and make a boatload of money doing it. oh and paul, tell an american farmer about "subsidies" while he goes bankrupt from mexican and canadian imports. happened to my father. NZ is a good example of an economy that restructured from being one that was essentially socialist with a complete raft of protections, to a market economy with few protections. If you go back before 1984 and bought something made in NZ, it was like it had been made in the 1950's as the designs were really 1950's. The manufacturing base had stood still as it had no reason to develop - it was protected. The reform brought about change, and a general rise in the standard of living. Subsidies were removed for farmers. Today, farmers receive few handouts. Many went to the wall, and today if they don't run a good business, they go out of business. That's the way the World works. Now, we're a vibrant economy, a hotbed of technological innovation and enterprise. There are few that can match us. If the USA forgets the lessons it will end up without a pot to piss in. Maybe the Fashion Industry in the 80’s was from the 50’s era, but not the manufacturing of goods .A vibrant economy? I doubted it. Not since the mid 80’s when the Labour led Government (the Party that stood for good socialism) adopted the theories of an accountant/pig-farmer Roger (now Sir Roger) Douglas, LP’s Finance Minister at the time had we had stable economy. Many considered his ideas to be some sort of a joke in bad taste. Prior to that, NZ had a mixed socialist/capitalist economy and the socialist part of this meant that the less fortunate were looked after by the more fortunate. But NZ was prosperous back then. Unemployment was at less than 1%; even 0.4%, as a result most NZlanders had the essentials for a good and reasonable life, and the NZ economy was in these regards much envied by other countries. NZ was a world leader in many activities It was a controlled economy for sure. But this had the good spin-off that what the country could not import was manufactured here. Hence there were strong and wide skills and industry bases in NZ. The LP (through Rogernomics) removed all direct Government assistance to producer groups, removed tariffs, the control of imports and import licensing, then proceeded to sale most if not all of the Government assets, (including strategic assets) sometimes at fire-sale prices. The effects of that great sell-off of the activities and resources that all New Zealanders had so assiduously created and maintained during the preceding 50 years have been apparent to many; transfer of wealth to a few and overseas, greatly increased unemployment, increasing poverty, increasing lawlessness, casualisation of the workforce, huge loss of skills and so on. Families began to suffer huge long-term decline and disruption (even to this day), plants closed, and still closing or shifting to China or Thailand, millions of dollars in wages were effectively sent overseas instead of going to NZ pockets. There has as a result been significant social restructuring, and huge social cost. Large and significant groups of society that formerly were in a comfortable financial position and employed productively became to be in a perilous financial state, and a great proportion of the populace has become impoverished. In contrast, some people have done very well out of all this; notably senior company management, and many businesses. What concerns me is the astronomical increase in social ills as a result of Rogernomics. Our healthcare system once the envy is busting at the seams. The few Hospitals that remained open can’t cope with the influx of patients and they result in keeping them in the corridors. Third world deceases become the norm. Poverty (as we know it) was unheard off in NZ but ashamedly the UN not long ago, voiced its concerns about our child poverty, one of the highest in the OECD countries. We have the highest teen suicide rates, highest teen pregnancies. Crime against property is on the increase so as gang proliferation. Our prison population is higher than that of the US (per capita). Paulnz…remember when we used to call NZ the land of milk and honey? Well now days even the middle class had to cut down on its milk consumption. Phew…that’s was a long rant. And I am not even a socialist…just a compassionate capitalist.
|