right all along? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


LadyEllen -> right all along? (9/30/2008 2:48:44 AM)

I have always maintained, in the face of significant resistance and occasionally ridicule, that the only way to create wealth is by making things - manufacturing, and that "shuffling pieces of paper" (my term) does not create wealth at all - ie the "financial services" industry in its many guises.

The problem is that one can only produce a piece of paper for the shuffling sector if it is based on some manufactured item - it could be a raw material, it could be a finished product or anything in between, but the supposed value of the piece of paper is always related to some physical asset.

Indeed, from what I understand of it, the problem at the core of today's crisis is "shuffling pieces of paper", each shuffle being more distant from and more abstracted from the manufactured item - a house is also a manufactured item - on which the supposed value of the piece of paper is based. 

Now its undoubted that there is money to be made from shuffling pieces of paper, but if the pieces of paper represent physical assets and the shuffling results in the paper acquiring a higher price than the asset itself, its only a matter of time before the piece of paper has to be devalued to meet its true value - that of the asset, the manufactured item on which the piece of paper is based.

The question then is what effect this might have on those other pieces of paper we all use to represent physical assets (money). If the current actual value of that money - represented by and/or derived from the physical assets of the country - is a lot less than we think, then we have the same problem on Main St as on Wall St. And it might be worth a lot less than we think, considering that we have switched our economy to be service orientated (and reliant at that on the financial services sector), shipped manufacturing overseas and thus have no real means left to us to create actual wealth.

That the loss of manufacturing and the switch to services was driven by those with an eye for paper shuffling adds insult to injury. Although consoling if the vast amounts of money they made that way should now depreciate in value as the true nature of its backing becomes clear, 50% of millions leaves one well off whilst 50% of Mr Average's take home pay puts him in poverty.

And this is bad news too for those to whom we have yielded our manufacturing. The money we owe them, should we be able to pay is now worth less than it was before - and their markets (our stores and firms) are now drying up quick. Our poverty will seem the height of luxurious excess to the unemployed Chinese factory worker.

If I'm right - then any $700 billion package, (in fact $1 trillion would be a cheap price to pay) should go towards retooling and reviving manufacturing in its many guises. This will mean hard times for some years but leave us emerging with real assets, real value against which the paper shufflers can shuffle and the rest of us can live and prosper.

E




pahunkboy -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 4:46:04 AM)

Lady E. Im glad you are back!

Here is an example.

Today, I can pound away on the computer. I could be on 2 hours, or 12 hours.

If I am on 12 hours, then I am not doing dishes, laundry, cleaning, painting, doing repairs to my house.

Yes- some office work is shrewd and wise.

But diminishing returns happen....to the point where there will be nothing to wear or eat.




kdsub -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 4:55:40 AM)

What you have described is exactly why I believe in  industrial isolationism of America. It would really make no difference if the goods were made in the US with higher labor costs because the laborers would be able to pay more for the products.

The moving of industry to cheaper labor markets was and is very short sited. Each move reduces the American workers ability to purchase the products. The company owners did not reduce the cost of their products... they just rake in profit...UNTIL...no one can afford their products anymore...It is beginning to happen... at least in the US
I feel for countries like the UK... you even worse off then us....At least we still have massive amounts of farm land...and many natural resources if we needed to fall back on our own industrial base




LadyEllen -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 5:09:26 AM)

Thanks KD - I actually cut my final paragraph off, which was along the lines of a need to withdraw from this "international global market" thing and reevaluate during a period when we each take care of our own business without the destabilising interference of outside agencies/countries. Problem being with that, it would require us withdrawing our interference in others' affairs too, which isnt going to go down well here with those who make the rules - but then, its about time we made the rules.

What I'm talking about is some sort of "national socialist" approach to the economy (the economy only before I get jumped on) - ie looking after our own first, in competition and cooperation with others as they wish and according to our internal goals. Isolationist for sure, but no need not to trade if it meets some goal we have for our people and country - and no more selling off our family silver (and the recovery of that which has been sold off) to all and sundry who have little interest in the welfare of our people and country.

E




Paulnz -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 5:12:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
It would really make no difference if the goods were made in the US with higher labor costs because the laborers would be able to pay more for the products.


Problem with this is, US exports would fall behind as they wouldn't be cost competitive. The importers would be cheaper, and over time, would likely perform better as well. If you prevented these imports, the other countries would impose counter tariffs or restrictions which would further hurt the export sector. The result is the USA would go backwards.





SoulPiercer -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 5:29:39 AM)

I read this a few days ago. Things that make you go ... Hmmmmmm ...

Hi Pals,

I'm against the $85,000,000, 000.00 bailout of AIG.

Instead, I'm in favor of giving $85,000,000, 000 to America in a 'We Deserve It Dividend'.

To make the math simple, let's assume there are 200,000,000 bon-a-fide U.S. Citizens 18+.

Our population is about 301,000,000 +/- counting every man,woman and child. So 200,000,000 might be a fair stab at adults 18 and up.

So divide 200 million adults 18+ into $85 billion that equals $425,000.

My plan is to give $425,000 to every person 18+ as a 'We Deserve It Dividend'.

Of course, it would NOT be tax free. So let's assume a tax rate of 30%.

Every individual 18+ has to pay $127,500.00 in taxes.

That sends $25,500,000,000 right back to Uncle Sam.

But it means that every adult 18+ has $297,500.00 in their Pocket. A husband and wife has $595,000.00.

What would/could you do with $297,500.00 to $595,000.00 in your family?

Pay off your mortgage - housing crisis solved.

Repay college loans - what a great boost to new grads.

Put away money for college - it'll be there.

Save in a bank - create money to loan to entrepreneurs.

Buy a new car - create jobs.

Invest in the market - capital drives growth.

Pay for your parent's medical insurance - health care improves.

Enable Deadbeat Dads to come clean - or else.

Remember this is for every adult U S Citizen 18+ including the folks who lost their jobs at Lehman Brothers and every other company that is cutting back. And of course, for those serving in our Armed Forces.

If we're going to re-distribute wealth let's really do it...instead of  trickling out a puny $1000.00 ( "vote buy" ) economic incentive that is being proposed by one of our candidates for President.

If we're going to do an $85 billion bailout, let's bail out every adult U S Citizen 18+!

As for AIG - liquidate it. Sell off its parts. Let American General go back to being American General. Sell off the real estate. Let the private sector bargain hunters cut it up and clean it up.

Here's my rationale. We deserve it and AIG doesn't.

Sure it's a crazy idea that can "never work."

But can you imagine the Coast-To-Coast Block Party!

I trust my fellow adult Americans to know how to use The $85 Billion 'We Deserve It Dividend' more than I Do the geniuses at AIG or in Washington DC.

And remember, The Birk plan only really costs $59.5 Billion because $25.5

Billion is returned instantly in taxes To Uncle Sam.

Ahhh...I feel so much better getting that off my chest.




LadyEllen -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 5:32:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Paulnz

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
It would really make no difference if the goods were made in the US with higher labor costs because the laborers would be able to pay more for the products.


Problem with this is, US exports would fall behind as they wouldn't be cost competitive. The importers would be cheaper, and over time, would likely perform better as well. If you prevented these imports, the other countries would impose counter tariffs or restrictions which would further hurt the export sector. The result is the USA would go backwards.




Is this not however the conventional wisdom that has got us into this mess? It is in the manipulation of economics through such wisdom that we have lost out - we the ordinary people, we the nation as it is represented by its people.

Surely it is for individual countries' electorates to decide whether they wish to protect their own economy from outside interference? That is, it is not for bankers, financiers, industrialists and politicans who depend on them for election funding to decide.

The US and the EU for that matter, are large enough markets and resource pools that exporting and importing could be made almost irrelevant, peripheral affairs - and perhaps they should be, along with the whole global market economy and its related wisdom.

At this moment its necessary I feel for each country to get back on its feet, restock the value larder and get back to basics - and that would be far easier without speculators in Hong Kong (for instance) undermining the effort and hurting our peoples and our nations.





OneMoreWaste -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 5:37:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoulPiercer
So divide 200 million adults 18+ into $85 billion that equals $425,000.


Actually, it equals $425.00
I wonder if the original author works on Wall Street.




OneMoreWaste -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 5:42:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen
If I'm right - then any $700 billion package, (in fact $1 trillion would be a cheap price to pay) should go towards retooling and reviving manufacturing in its many guises. This will mean hard times for some years but leave us emerging with real assets, real value against which the paper shufflers can shuffle and the rest of us can live and prosper.


While I agree with you 100% that the outsourcing of manufacturing is a long-term disaster, and that paper and pixels do not generate actual wealth, I don't know that this would do anything except give the next round of CEOs something to sell.

If we end up in a military conflict with China, we sure are going to miss that manufacturing capacity, tho...




Aneirin -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 5:46:54 AM)

Reading what you have written there Lady E, it caused me to wonder, just exactly what does the UK export to other countries that are a benefit to a significant number of UK workers. Could it be that we are more of a service nation now, service in that we are repairers and replacers, not the manufacturers we once were ? Could we ever get back to manufacturing if the need came, given that the old engineering trades are some of the lowest paid and as a result training in these trades over the past twenty years or so has tapered down ? Trading and manufacturing were always Britain's strengths, what is it now, financial services ?




tsatske -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 5:47:19 AM)

Why would China ever feel the need to get into a military conflict withus? This would be like my bank going through it's mortgage notes and deciding which ones to attack. I don't know if you've noticed, but we are mortaged to the hilt, and China owns the paper. Short version of the same sentence: China owns us.

BTW, in SoulPiercer's defense, it is pretty damn easy to make a decimal point mistake. I am pretty sure that every person with a biz or econ degree, every CEO, and, well, just about everyone, has made one of those, from time to time. Actually, I am thinking that the CEOs in question may have made more than their share of them.




kdsub -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 6:05:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Paulnz

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
It would really make no difference if the goods were made in the US with higher labor costs because the laborers would be able to pay more for the products.


Problem with this is, US exports would fall behind as they wouldn't be cost competitive. The importers would be cheaper, and over time, would likely perform better as well. If you prevented these imports, the other countries would impose counter tariffs or restrictions which would further hurt the export sector. The result is the USA would go backwards.




I don't believe this to be true...the US is unique because it has so many raw materials...we could easily survive without one drop of oil or most other basic raw materials from outside our borders.

Not only that but the re-industrialization of America would build out power back in the world...not reduce it. Remember we import far more than we export...so tariffs on our goods would have minimal affect. Also keep in mind the US is the bread basket of the world...that will not change... it will be are biggest export in the future....Everyone needs to eat.

Butch




LadyEllen -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 6:07:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

Reading what you have written there Lady E, it caused me to wonder, just exactly what does the UK export to other countries that are a benefit to a significant number of UK workers. Could it be that we are more of a service nation now, service in that we are repairers and replacers, not the manufacturers we once were ? Could we ever get back to manufacturing if the need came, given that the old engineering trades are some of the lowest paid and as a result training in these trades over the past twenty years or so has tapered down ? Trading and manufacturing were always Britain's strengths, what is it now, financial services ?


Everything we make and export brings benefit to a UK worker. Everything we make and sell in the domestic market brings benefit to a UK worker. Making things generates jobs for those making them and jobs for service industries. As we are now we have service industry jobs with nothing but empty promises supporting them.

Our manufacturing has been destroyed from within by poor marketing attitudes and stupid union bosses and from without by political agendas and overseas competitors allowed to enter our market.

I dont buy the argument that its too expensive to manufacture here. The Germans, French, Italians et al manufacture and do alright; working in road transport one sees at first hand what the position is - roughly, we export one lorry load for every two lorry loads that come into the UK, and thats just with Europe.

We just about have a chance, dragging people out of retirement, to rebuild our manufacturing base. And we need a radical rethink about the social values of making things compared to service industries.

E




cjan -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 6:08:23 AM)

LadyE, I agree , largely, with what you say. We have to get back to "making stuff" instead of shuffling paper in the USA.

As the Gordon Gekko character in "Wall Street" said  "The richest one percent of this country owns half our country's wealth, five trillion dollars. One third of that comes from hard work, two thirds comes from inheritance, interest on interest accumulating to widows and idiot sons and what I do, stock and real estate speculation. It's bullshit. You got ninety percent of the American public out there with little or no net worth. I create nothing. I own. We make the rules, pal. The news, war, peace, famine, upheaval, the price per paper clip. We pick that rabbit out of the hat while everybody sits out there wondering how the hell we did it. Now you're not naive enough to think we're living in a democracy, are you buddy? It's the free market. And you're a part of it. You've got that killer instinct. Stick around pal, I've still got a lot to teach you."

Here's an interesting piece recently published in the NYT on this topic.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/opinion/28friedman.html?_r=1&em&oref=slogin




SilverMark -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 6:38:13 AM)

I certainly wish it were as simple as making the decision that we(The USA) were going back to a manufacturing based economy. The American consumer will NOT pay for American goods and large manufacturers can hardly keep up with the capital expenditures to modernize the factories they have. When America was manufacturing as opposed to importing prices were at a moderate level as was the cost of living. As technology changed an the 400 lb. gorilla of manufacturing(China) moved toward capitalism we simply took the easy road of buying cheaper goods. WalMart as late as the early 90's had banners all over their stores...Buy American! now, spend a day in one and find more than a handful of items made here. Look at the labels in your clothes....would you have bought what you wear at a 25% higher price? Who built your cell phone? Your TV? your car? There are enough consumers in the USA to provide large markets for almost anything manufactured but, in the search for the "best deal" we sell ourselves short and do little to help ourselves or neighbors. The spiral we have started no one knows how to stop, until the rest of the world's cost of living rises to the level we have it simply won't. Our manufacturer's attitude toward quality and price has largely cost themselves the very market that feeds them. The manufactures have hurt themselves and the buying public has bought themselves to some degree into a mess that they cannot buy themselves out of.




Irishknight -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 7:12:07 AM)

Walmart created the "buy foreign" dilemma.  They wanted to be able to drive other businesses into the ground with prices well below what anyone else could provide.  They wanted to be a monopoly on shopping and to kill any competition.  We now get inferior products at the same price that they were before.
If each person would be willing to look for American alternatives to foriegn crap, we would find ourselves pulling out of this mess.  It cost me 4 dollars more per tire to get tires made in the US than it would have to get tires made in Korea.  I had to argue with the tire store clerk for the priviledge of buying an American product.  Having used both brands before, I can tell you that the Korean brand rides like they're made out of concrete.  For a measly 4 bucks, I got a better tire and supported an American worker.

And, for the record, I would be willing to pay 25 to 50 % more for an American product.  China ships us crap and poisoned products.  Who wants to poison their kids or their pets for a small savings?  Not me.




UncleNasty -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 7:48:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark

I certainly wish it were as simple as making the decision that we(The USA) were going back to a manufacturing based economy. The American consumer will NOT pay for American goods and large manufacturers can hardly keep up with the capital expenditures to modernize the factories they have. When America was manufacturing as opposed to importing prices were at a moderate level as was the cost of living. As technology changed an the 400 lb. gorilla of manufacturing(China) moved toward capitalism we simply took the easy road of buying cheaper goods. WalMart as late as the early 90's had banners all over their stores...Buy American! now, spend a day in one and find more than a handful of items made here. Look at the labels in your clothes....would you have bought what you wear at a 25% higher price? Who built your cell phone? Your TV? your car? There are enough consumers in the USA to provide large markets for almost anything manufactured but, in the search for the "best deal" we sell ourselves short and do little to help ourselves or neighbors. The spiral we have started no one knows how to stop, until the rest of the world's cost of living rises to the level we have it simply won't. Our manufacturer's attitude toward quality and price has largely cost themselves the very market that feeds them. The manufactures have hurt themselves and the buying public has bought themselves to some degree into a mess that they cannot buy themselves out of.


Emphasis added.

In order for things like "cost of living" or "quality of life" or "median income" to be the same across the board it needs to find an average in which the ends are closer to the middle. Those things won't simply rise in other parts of the world to match ours (The US, but also the other industrialized countries, and/or first world countries). No, what is required to achieve that kind of leveling is for ours to be reduced and for the others to also rise. It likely won't be "A rising tide lifts all boats" kind of thing.

In regard to the OP's points. I have always thought self sufficiency is the best way to go. I even extended that to "gender role" kind of things, e.g., I can cook, clean house well, sew on buttons and hem pants, etc.. It seemed the best way to make good decisions regarding romantic and emotional relationships would be to not need someone in the role of "wife." I wasn't dependent on anyone for the balance, at least in the immediate sense.

I see the same dynamic of independence applying to manufacturing and production.

As for shuffling paper and considering it to actually have intrinsic worth and value that is merely chasing mirrors in the haze.

Uncle Nasty

Uncle Nasty 




Termyn8or -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 8:41:29 AM)

cj, I bet you liked Other People's Money as well.

That, for those who didn't see it, a small firm, but big enough to be traded publicly was found to be making a profit and practically debt free. It became a target. DeVito got up there with a pretty good oration, once there were enough voting stockholders he figured he could sway to take the company over, and it was quite compelling.

"Buggy whips, yes buggy whips. A long time ago there were plenty of buggy whip manufacturers, and they did well. Along came the automobile and the demand for buggy whips evaporated. I bet the last buggy whip manufacturer made the bext damn buggy whips in the world".And soon later "Having an ever increasing share of a shrinking market is _____" I think the word he used was death, or the phrase death knell.

In other words, it's not just manufacturing, it's what you manufacture. Yes we do make paper clips stateside, but think about a modern office. More and more information is on a computer, the only paper is usually for documents which need to be signed and possibly notarized. Chinese companies have not decided to go into the paper clip business, and it's not hard to figure out why. More than likely, in years to come even that will change, your driver's license or ID will have a PIN number you put in and swipe it through a reader, that will constitute a signature. There will be alot less paper required, at least what needs to be stored in an office somewhere. Car titles and birth certificates will probably still exist for a long time, but the bulk of the dead tree cabinets will be gone.

I may tend to do this more than I should, but I use TVs for such examples. First reason is that they are ubiquitous in at least US households. If I had a dollar for each TV in the US, even limited to those in use, in good working condition, I would be quite well off. That directly plugs into my statement that it is easier to get a dollar each from a million people than it is to get a million dollars from one. Actually it is not my statement, but it resonates quite well.

Absolutely no TVs are built in the US, even though we invented the thing. Yes I know Baird invented it too, in the UK but that doesn't change the fact that Farnsworth invented it here. We most certainly invented color TV, and perhaps we should get a dollar per color TV in the world. Now that's moving into the area of intellectual property.

That's somethuing that I would like to probe you for opinions about. Realize that I hold that there are two types of intellectual property, the useful and the useless. The useful would be considered patents and such, requiring royalties in the form of license to manufacture something that uses a process for which a patent was deemed suited, and is still in force. Take a look at almost any TV you can find, at least in the US, and you will see a Dolby labs emblem somewhere, usually in the back. They literrally do collect on every TV sold here. I don't think they get a buck each, but it adds up quickly.

Which is my point, the old million form one vs the one from a million. That is EXACTLY where we have lost the financial game, and I mean precisely where we lost it. I don't mean the Dolby deal, I mean the things we make may be great, but they are not things that keep selling. We still have an auto industry, and despite their whining they could be doing alot worse. But the point is, just how many cars do you need ?

As has been said, houses can be considered manufactured goods. They are, and it is damn hard to outsource. But how many houses do you need ?

Where are all these cellphones made ? I know people who walk around with three of them. One to talk to their boss, one for their "private" deals and one from their girlfriend. It seems to be the new equivalent for an engagement ring or something. If things go sour and he won't give it back you can always shut it off. One of the more modern conveniences I guess.

And TVs. In one house, with two people living there, there could be six TVs. Livingroom, bedroom, kitchen, bath, even in the garage. Understand that there is one house, there is one car in the drive. There may be two refrigerators but not always. I just mentioned where five TVs would go, put one in the basement and/or have more than one bedroom, how many is that ? If I had a buck each you would never hear a peep of dissent out of me.

I know two people who have Bose acoustic wave radios, and I have only seen three of them in my life. They are made in the US, even though they use some foreign components. But wait, how many people do I know who have them ? Everyone I know has some kind of stereo or something, but where were they made ?

Up until the year 2000 I would say, Pioneer bigscreen TVs were made here. Nice, black laquer cabinet, covers over the buttons and nothing but a wee little green power light. Premium sound and outputs for surround usually. Actually very good unit even though they are hard to work on. When you could get a Sony for $2,500, these were going for $3,500. The Sony was a good unit as well, and though they never pretended to be an American company, they moved part of their manufacturing operation here.

I worked for and with a place that sold both, and the Pioneer made here was a good selling point. The Sonys over a certain size were at least assembled here and the picture tubes were now made here, that was a selling point as well. Back then, when Honda opened a plant stateside, people started buying Hondas.

People cared at least a little bit, but do they even care now ? At all ?

This quagmire of a situation we're in now is attributable to the people as well as the powers that be. Years ago when we started buying based on price, we told them what we wanted. When our Parents bought the Okongyousho TV for $199 instead of the Zenith for $279, they told the whole business community what they wanted.

In a way, government and industry have complied with the wishes of the consumer. That's how people get rich. Many people don't like Walmart because of their business practices, and I agree with that, I don't go to Walmart. Many others do though, enough that the Walmarts still exist, and they are making money.

We need to focus on gaining part of the mass markets. It may not be as exciting as building sattelites, bombs and ships to go to the moon, but we need money.

T




cjan -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 8:56:08 AM)

I suggest your read the article I linked to in my post. The suggestio is not to manufacture paper clips,textiles or tvs, i.e., old technologies that can be done cheaper in developing countries, but to invest in developing so called "green" technologies and rebuilding the infrastructure in the US, from bridges to the electrical grid. That is, new technologies.that by their very nature, keep jobs and generate capital in the US while benefitting all Americans.




LadyEllen -> RE: right all along? (9/30/2008 9:03:08 AM)

Interesting post T, some good points

Something I'd add is the example of a company up in Halifax (Yorkshire England). They make tumble dryers for the UK and European market and do well out of it for six months a year - but when the summer comes their sales drop like a rock. So, rather than moping about, they realised their tools for making tumble dryer cabinets could be turned to make barbecues and garden equipment. Now they make and sell stuff all year round - even in a rainy British summer like the last two when they arent selling barbecues, they continue to turn out tumble dryers. Its that sort of flexible thinking that we need.

The downside is, they use cheap east European trucking without carbon emission offset. But I'm working on them.

E




Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.394531E-02