RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


variation30 -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/7/2008 7:02:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie

Actually...in the next revision of history...it will be exactly those people (those who save, have cash, build, etc.) who will do well.


I'm reminded of the tories who refused the continental dollar during the revolution and came out much better after the rest of the population was ravaged by the continental (always remember the phrase, not worth a continental).

I agree that those who are saving right now will do better in the long run, but as far as those who have cash...they would be more safe putting those into hard commodities and burying them under a cage full of rottweilers, as that's the best way to ensure you're going to have buying power in the coming years. (I'm going to say it's going to be 1.5-2 years before things get very, very bad. our 'leaders' will force prices to stay high for a little while longer, inflation's going to hit like a macktruck and everything's going to spiral. now this situation is bad. however. the fact that the chairman of our fed thinks that the problem with the great deprsesion was that the government and fed did not spend enough money to get us out of a depression multiplies the severity of the problem several times over.

quote:

Ironically....you're the only ones who will be able to borrow.


I haven't thought of taht yet, and yes that's quite funny.




variation30 -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/7/2008 7:42:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jniu4

We're 12-18 hours away from systemic meltdown across world finanical markets.

We've lost 1300 or so Dow points since the Bailout. Down 500 since a huge Commercial Paper bank was opened this morning by the Federal Reserve. Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Royal Bank of Scotland (to name a few) lost anywhere from 20-40% of their value today.

Nothing has worked. There's no time left in your checking account when it goes down 20-40% a day. We don't have any more big banks to lose.

Look for a huge coordinated rate cut across the globe spearheaded by the Brits tonight or tomorrow - or look out. Time to take a stand.



first off, the dow going down is bad...but the dow =/= our economy. there are more factors at work. though I do think it's funny that every time, and I mean EVERY time bernanke goes on tv the dow drops like a rock. oh I love it.

but yeah, this is why you don't put your wealth in banks. everytime I make enough money to buy an ounce of gold, I buy one. I dont' have much money, but what I do have will work as  reverse barometer to what everyone else has in our 'legal tender' - the worse you get, the better I get. let's keep in mind, around a month ago gold was around 700 an ounce (hell, I remember when it was in the 300's in the late 90's...why did I not buy up a few ounces of gold then...I was such a stupid kid), recently it's been bouncing between 830-905 an ounce. it'll go higher (I'll bet anyone here it'll go up to 1200). it's not that I'm making money, quite the opposite. my paltry nestegg is staying the same, it's just that everyone else is losing wealth due to speculation (I think we went down seven cents against the euro within the last two weeks, for example) and inflation.

time for me to dump the rest of my savings into silver. kitco here I come. though the word I've been hearing through the grapevine is that if you want to really make money during this crisis...buy futures in milk :) for those of you who realize how awesome this idea is, you are officially a friend of mine.

although buying futures may be illegal soon...hell...they already started regulating shorting stocks...




TNstepsout -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/7/2008 8:44:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: variation30

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

It is the global market which will right itself, if it is to be righted - all our leaders can do is try to put together the legal framework for that to occur - but in a competitive global economy they all have to act together to make that happen; the markets as we have seen, are very good at exploiting any loophole and any gap in the framework to their (not our) advantage.

E


listen, our 'leaders' cannot fix this through regulation, which is exactly what they are trying to do. they're trying to keep prices high, banks running, businesses from failing, etc.

but that's not what should happen. we should have bankruptcies, people go out of business, and bank runs. what is more, these are good things. the threats of these things make every single bank, corporation, and individual responsible for it's debts and contracts. if they go bankrupt, this is not a bad thing, this is a magnificent thing (the way Hoppe describes it). it's the threat of bankruptcy and failure that makes these institutions and individuals act responsibly and wisely.

these institutions should fail. prices should plummet. individuals should save. and governments should butt out.



I agree with you to a certain extent, but these things only work properly to balance out the bubbles in theory. In real life they have some very nasty unintended consequences. If the economy were allowed to completely implode we would have unemployment at unimaginable levels. When people are scared, desperate and hopeless, terrible things happen. The Great Depression lead to some very dangerous ideologies and the rise of some of the cruelest dictators the world has ever known and eventually a World War that cost  millions of lives and ended with two cities being completely wiped off the map.  Let's hope we can solve the current crisis a little more eloquently.

Perhaps the system needs to change, perhaps it will change, but that can't and shouldn't happen over night. If things are left to completely unravel on their own, the resulting chaos could take FAR longer to reknit than if we shore it up and help transform it into something else.  And, what do you plan to do with your gold if the cupboard is bare? Can you eat it? Who will buy it?




variation30 -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/7/2008 9:09:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TNstepsout

I agree with you to a certain extent, but these things only work properly to balance out the bubbles in theory. In real life they have some very nasty unintended consequences. If the economy were allowed to completely implode we would have unemployment at unimaginable levels.


I hate to be the harbinger of bad news, sweetheard, but the economy is going to do worse than implode if we try to regulate ourselves out of a panic. if you want to see how it should be handled, look up the panic of 1819 (I mentioned it in a similar thread on these froums). the government did next to nothing (which was still too much) and they got themselves out of a bad situation relatively quickly.

but as far as unemployment is concerned, there are a few things you can do to soften that blow. for instance, lower (or abolish) minimum wage.

"When people are scared, desperate and hopeless, terrible things happen. The Great Depression lead to some very dangerous ideologies and the rise of some of the cruelest dictators the world has ever known and eventually a World War that cost  millions of lives and ended with two cities being completely wiped off the map.  Let's hope we can solve the current crisis a little more eloquently. "

I know. we had fdr and he was the second worst president in our nation's history. but I don't know if you have read much regarding our...'progressive' (the word makes me shudder) era. but I think if you did, you'd find some striking similarities between hitler, mussolini, and wilson/fdr. I'd suggest you look at the wilson administration and fdr and then read mussolini's fascist manifesto and look at what the national socialists were doing in germany (this is speaking of economic/social policies that were being inacted). you may be surprised in what you see. jonah goldberg wrote an excellen book about the history of the american left called 'Liberal Fascism' (I'd suggest checking out the chapters on mussolini, wilson, and fdr).

quote:

Perhaps the system needs to change, perhaps it will change, but that can't and shouldn't happen over night. If things are left to completely unravel on their own, the resulting chaos could take FAR longer to reknit than if we shore it up and help transform it into something else.  And, what do you plan to do with your gold if the cupboard is bare? Can you eat it? Who will buy it?


again, I think you are ignorant about the situation. however, if you are curious, I'd suggest you read Rothbard's writings on the great depression and, as I suggested earlier, read up on the panic of 1819.




slaveboy291 -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/7/2008 9:18:06 PM)

The fact that the the book is named Liberal Fascism, is enough to tell you it's as full of crap as the website Hitlerwasasocialist and Ann Coulters How to Speak to a Liberal(if you have too)

I'm a history buff, I don't recally Mussolini ever having a written manifesto of Fascists views.

And any comparison between Roosevelt and Hitler, Mussolini or any other dictator no matter what is way out of context.




variation30 -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/7/2008 10:58:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboy291

The fact that the the book is named Liberal Fascism, is enough to tell you it's as full of crap as the website Hitlerwasasocialist and Ann Coulters How to Speak to a Liberal(if you have too)

And any comparison between Roosevelt and Hitler, Mussolini or any other dictator no matter what is way out of context.


um...if you knew anything about the topic, which you don't, you'd know that liberal fascism is not goldberg's title. it was coined by h.g. wells when he was saying that the new left should be 'enligthened nazis and liberal fascists.'

and yes, hitler was a socialist. if you'd like to argue this, I'd be more than happy to educate you on the nation socialist movement in germany, whose hands the means of production was in, how hitler and his party felt about capitalism and capitalists, etc.

but then again, you're probably one of those people who think that fascism is a 'right-wing' movement...so I'd have to explain quite a bit to you (or you could just read the book).

as far as comparing hitler, mussolini, and fdr...I think you may not have a good idea of the times. fascism and national socialism (especially fascism) were considered progressive movements andt hese men were idolized in america for a time. mussolini was times' man of the year twice and hitler was once.

"I'm a history buff, I don't recally Mussolini ever having a written manifesto of Fascists views."

then you aren't much of a history buff. it was written by a committe of estranged members of the socialist party - primarily mussolini. it was published in mussolini's newspaper 'the people of italy'.

if you read the fascist manifesto, which I know you have not, you would recognize it as a progressive movement: here's a list of what is in it:

  • Universal suffrage polled on a regional basis, with proportional representation and voting and electoral office eligibility for women;
  • Proportional representation on a regional basis;
  • Voting for women (which was opposed by most other European nations);
  • Representation at government level of newly created National Councils by economic sector;
  • The abolition of the Italian Senate (at the time, the Senate, as the upper house of parliament, was by process elected by the wealthier citizens, but were in reality direct appointments by the King. It has been described as a sort of extended council of the Crown);
  • The formation of a National Council of experts for labor, for industry, for transportation, for the public health, for communications, etc. Selections to be made of professionals or of tradesmen with legislative powers, and elected directly to a General Commission with ministerial powers (this concept was rooted in corporatist ideology and derived in part from Catholic social doctrine).
  • The quick enactment of a law of the State that sanctions an eight-hour workday for all workers;
  • A minimum wage;
  • The participation of workers' representatives in the functions of industry commissions;
  • To show the same confidence in the labor unions (that prove to be technically and morally worthy) as is given to industry executives or public servants;
  • Reorganisation of the railways and the transport sector;
  • Revision of the draft law on invalidity insurance;
  • Reduction of the retirement age from 65 to 55.
  • A strong progressive tax on capital (envisaging a “partial expropriation” of concentrated wealth);
  • The seizure of all the possessions of the religious congregations and the abolition of all the bishoprics, which constitute an enormous liability on the Nation and on the privileges of the poor;
etc. the national socialist movement had very similar platforms though the nazis weren't as...idealistic as the fascists...they were more opportunistic.

but yes, both national socialism and fascism were progressive movements from the left and share striking similarities to a lot of things done under men like wilson or FDR.

but this is a different topic altogether. if you want me to explain the history of the fascist movement from their origins in international socialism to mussolini's break during WWI, to the fascists making the trains run on time, and so forth...start another threat saying something along the lines of 'people who think hitler was a socialist were dumb lol' and I'll correct you.




winterlight -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 12:10:36 AM)

I know somebody in one state that is stocking up on food and other things. He and others in his state feel that the depression is coming and we will be going through what our parents did.




meatcleaver -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 12:29:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: variation30

and yes, hitler was a socialist. if you'd like to argue this, I'd be more than happy to educate you on the nation socialist movement in germany, whose hands the means of production was in, how hitler and his party felt about capitalism and capitalists, etc.



You are showing your complete and utter ignorance of both socialism and fascism. Socialism is internationalist, Hitler was a nationalist. Fascism is nationalist which is why Hitler could talk about pure blood. The nationalist part of Hitler's movement has more in common with American patriotism than with anyone who believes in  internationalism. The Americans say 'In god we trust.', the NAZIs said, ''God is with us', both seem to have the belief god is on their side, socialist tend not to believe in god. You have to look deeper than names and titles in politics, you have to look at the substance and motivations of movements, parties and nations.




kinkbound -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 12:39:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TNstepsout

While we are at it, check out this link about "default credit swaps". Talk about a house of cards http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8634




Interesting link!

But wait! <Gasp> If it can't be blamed on either the Democrats of Republicans, then that CAN'T really be the problem! 

[;)]




NeedToUseYou -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 12:56:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: variation30

and yes, hitler was a socialist. if you'd like to argue this, I'd be more than happy to educate you on the nation socialist movement in germany, whose hands the means of production was in, how hitler and his party felt about capitalism and capitalists, etc.



You are showing your complete and utter ignorance of both socialism and fascism. Socialism is internationalist, Hitler was a nationalist. Fascism is nationalist which is why Hitler could talk about pure blood. The nationalist part of Hitler's movement has more in common with American patriotism than with anyone who believes in  internationalism. The Americans say 'In god we trust.', the NAZIs said, ''God is with us', both seem to have the belief god is on their side, socialist tend not to believe in god. You have to look deeper than names and titles in politics, you have to look at the substance and motivations of movements, parties and nations.


I just read about ten definitions of socialism define:socialism, google. And none of the ones I read listed internationalism as a  basic part of socialism.

I do have to ask, where are you getting your definitions from, as sometimes, you use what seems to be counter-standard accepted meanings.

edited to add, nor do they reference religion.




meatcleaver -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 1:06:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NeedToUseYou

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: variation30

and yes, hitler was a socialist. if you'd like to argue this, I'd be more than happy to educate you on the nation socialist movement in germany, whose hands the means of production was in, how hitler and his party felt about capitalism and capitalists, etc.



You are showing your complete and utter ignorance of both socialism and fascism. Socialism is internationalist, Hitler was a nationalist. Fascism is nationalist which is why Hitler could talk about pure blood. The nationalist part of Hitler's movement has more in common with American patriotism than with anyone who believes in  internationalism. The Americans say 'In god we trust.', the NAZIs said, ''God is with us', both seem to have the belief god is on their side, socialist tend not to believe in god. You have to look deeper than names and titles in politics, you have to look at the substance and motivations of movements, parties and nations.


I just read about ten definitions of socialism define:socialism, google. And none of the ones I read listed internationalism as a  basic part of socialism.

I do have to ask, where are you getting your definitions from, as sometimes, you use what seems to be counter-standard accepted meanings.

edited to add, nor do they reference religion.



The historical socialist anthem, The International.  Hitler sent socialists to the death camps precisely because they were internationalists and against international aggression.

Arise ye pris'ners of starvation
Arise ye wretched of the earth
For justice thunders condemnation
A better world's in birth!
No more tradition's chains shall bind us
Arise, ye slaves, no more in thrall;
The earth shall rise on new foundations
We have been naught we shall be all.

Refrain:
'Tis the final conflict
Let each stand in his place
The International Union
shall be the human race.

We want no condescending saviors
to rule us from their judgement hall
We workers ask not for their favors
Let us consult for all.
To make the theif disgorge his booty
To free the spirit from its cell
We must ourselves decide our duty
We must decide and do it well.

The law oppresses us and tricks us,
the wage slave system drains our blood;
The rich are free from obligation,
The laws the poor delude.
Too long we've languished in subjection,
Equality has other laws;
"No rights", says she "without their duties,
No claims on equals without cause."

Behold them seated in their glory
The kings of mine and rail and soil!
What have you read in all their story,
But how they plundered toil?
Fruits of the workers' toil are buried
In strongholds of the idle few
In working for their restitution
the men will only claim their due.

We toilers from all fields united
Join hand in hand with all who work;
The earth belongs to us, the workers,
No room here for the shirk.
How many on our flesh have fattened!
But if the norsome birds of prey
Shall vanish from the sky some morning
The blessed sunlight then will stay.




NeedToUseYou -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 1:22:15 AM)

Well, you might want to define what your version of socialism is sometime(maybe in sig line or something), as maybe that is were some of the conflict is coming from, as that interpretation you are using is not what the common meaning of the term is, at least in the midwest, and apparently most definitions.

Just saying. It causes confusion, when people don't have a common definition to base the discussion around.




meatcleaver -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 1:35:11 AM)

Socialist philosophy was, is and always has been internationalist, right from its birth. I'm sure socialism isn't defined in America in its correct way because of decades of capitalist propaganda in the American media. I have to admit when I hear Americans talk about socialism, I don't recognize it but I recognize socialism when it is discussed by someone of any other nationality. I have also never heard a rational statement about socialism when I've been in the states, not that it a word one would hear often. Americans have been brainwashed when it comes to socialism which is why they hate socialist policies such as national health systems even though Americans pay twice as much for theirs and get a lesser product for the extra money. America capitalists who own the US media are shit scared of ordinary Americans realizing how they could benefit from socialist policies that they have a rolling campaign to discredit it. Quite often you get some Bush Whitehouse puppet on a current affairs propgram here and start ranting on about Russians and socialism or China and socialism and they are just seen as idiots because it is quite obvious, they don't know what they are talking about, especially when they are talking on a the national TV wof a country that has a powerful socialist party and that country is free, has a great education system and better health care for its citizens than America provides for Americans.




NeedToUseYou -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 1:50:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

Socialist philosophy was, is and always has been internationalist, right from its birth. I'm sure socialism isn't defined in America in its correct way because of decades of capitalist propaganda in the American media. I have to admit when I hear Americans talk about socialism, I don't recognize it but I recognize socialism when it is discussed by someone of any other nationality. I have also never heard a rational statement about socialism when I've been in the states, not that it a word one would hear often. Americans have been brainwashed when it comes to socialism which is why they hate socialist policies such as national health systems even though Americans pay twice as much for theirs and get a lesser product for the extra money. America capitalists who own the US media are shit scared of ordinary Americans realizing how they could benefit from socialist policies that they have a rolling campaign to discredit it. Quite often you get some Bush Whitehouse puppet on a current affairs propgram here and start ranting on about Russians and socialism or China and socialism and they are just seen as idiots because it is quite obvious, they don't know what they are talking about, especially when they are talking on a the national TV wof a country that has a powerful socialist party and that country is free, has a great education system and better health care for its citizens than America provides for Americans.


okay, fair enough, so I've been getting the itch to read a new book, in the last few days, what book do you recommend to give me a true encompassing meaning of historic socialism. Preferably one on google books or something, I don't have to order.




meatcleaver -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 2:12:26 AM)

Socialism (A very short introduction) by Michael Newman. This is a good start because it doesn't get too bogged down in mindless ideology, it examines historical, contemporary and practical application of socialist ideas. It also doesn't pretend everything in the garden is roses.

http://books.google.com/books?id=C9h-URrKZd8C&dq=Socialism&hl=nl

With the current economic crisis and governments nationalizing banks all over, even if they are reluctant to use the word nationalize, socialist ideas are very much on the table even though capitalists won't use the word socialist.




seeksfemslave -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 2:46:26 AM)

Socialism may or may not be internationalist but it is basically about the ownership
of the means of production and distribution.
Neither Socialism nor totally free markets are the answer IMO.

Socialism falls because when someone else is expected to pay the bill, the fear of failure is removed or moneymay be created waste, indifference and  vested privilege of the bureaucratic classes raise their ugly heads.
Totally free markets tend to oligarchy, monopoly and relative poverty for the masses.

Something slightly left of centre is required backed up with regulatory teeth that bite.
ie a mixed economy allowing the enterprising the rewards of their efforts backed up with
universal provision of health care, education, housing. Things like that.
Look at the disaster that is education for the masses existing in the UK.
Thats what left wing idealogues can achieve.

Attempts to impose economic/social equality should never be considered.




ArizonaSunSwitch -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 3:00:12 AM)

Yeah Canada and Mexico have great health care systems.

That's why buffalo new york's hospitals are full of Canadians and phoenix hospitals are full of Mexicans.
At least most of the Canadians pay their bills (instead of the US Taxpayer).

The public will begin to reject socialized medicine once non-multi millionaire women begin experiencing natural childbirth in mass whenever they are lucky enough to go into labor *after* the one epidural qualified anesthesiologist per hospital goes home at 5pm. Do you think socialized medicine would work differently in this country than any other country's socialized medicine ?

And btw, we've been in a mixed statist economy since at least the new deal if not the mann act. Throwing around capitalist pejoratives just tells me you really don't understand the meaning of the term. Which the would-be ruling class in this country truly appreciates because, in effect, you are demanding government to deny your unalienable rights and to turn you into property of the state (to be used or disposed of as your owner sees fit). Since your (unintentional) demand for the government to reduce yourself from a person into an object effects my ability to live my life in (relative) freedom I'd really appreciate it if you did some independent study on the origin of this country. Ie. read the written record left behind by the founders themselves instead of taking the word of your (mostly) indoctrinated high school and college teachers. Understand that most of our founders thought our country would degenerate from a republic, to a democracy, to a kingship (ie dictatorship) within 150 years. What is happening to us today, they predicted at the birth of this country. Read the founders and gain some perspective on how freedom is lost. (the same way freedom has been lost over and over again since the beginnings of human civilization).

Once you do that i don't think you'll find it hard to understand that the sole purpose of socialized medicine is so government can control the quality of each individual's health care. Unless you're part of the ruling class you *lose* under this system by every metric (quality, cost, relationship with your doctor, etc).

Any person that doesn't understand that capitalism requires freedom and that freedom requires capitalism threatens the freedom of all of us. Sorry if that pisses anyone off, but frankly, if you're pissed, you don't understand.




meatcleaver -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 3:43:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Socialism may or may not be internationalist but it is basically about the ownership
of the means of production and distribution.
Neither Socialism nor totally free markets are the answer IMO.

Socialism falls because when someone else is expected to pay the bill, the fear of failure is removed or moneymay be created waste, indifference and  vested privilege of the bureaucratic classes raise their ugly heads.
Totally free markets tend to oligarchy, monopoly and relative poverty for the masses.

Something slightly left of centre is required backed up with regulatory teeth that bite.
ie a mixed economy allowing the enterprising the rewards of their efforts backed up with
universal provision of health care, education, housing. Things like that.
Look at the disaster that is education for the masses existing in the UK.
Thats what left wing idealogues can achieve.

Attempts to impose economic/social equality should never be considered.


The UK has never had an education system, its always had an ad hoc response to education which means that it keeps failing to deliver the goods, unlike the more socialist education policies of our continental rivals where social mobility has become the norm. Equality has never been the aim of socialism, equal opportunity has been the aim of socialism and for that, everyone needs access to good health and education systems. European social democracies have a history of producing world class industries.

I do notice that many of the British utilities (water, gas and electric) are now owned by the French and Germans, both of which have national education and health systems British socialists would love to aspire to and which rightwing Brits envy as they criticize them.




meatcleaver -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 3:46:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ArizonaSunSwitch

Yeah Canada and Mexico have great health care systems.

That's why buffalo new york's hospitals are full of Canadians and phoenix hospitals are full of Mexicans.
At least most of the Canadians pay their bills (instead of the US Taxpayer).

The public will begin to reject socialized medicine once non-multi millionaire women begin experiencing natural childbirth in mass whenever they are lucky enough to go into labor *after* the one epidural qualified anesthesiologist per hospital goes home at 5pm. Do you think socialized medicine would work differently in this country than any other country's socialized medicine ?

And btw, we've been in a mixed statist economy since at least the new deal if not the mann act. Throwing around capitalist pejoratives just tells me you really don't understand the meaning of the term. Which the would-be ruling class in this country truly appreciates because, in effect, you are demanding government to deny your unalienable rights and to turn you into property of the state (to be used or disposed of as your owner sees fit). Since your (unintentional) demand for the government to reduce yourself from a person into an object effects my ability to live my life in (relative) freedom I'd really appreciate it if you did some independent study on the origin of this country. Ie. read the written record left behind by the founders themselves instead of taking the word of your (mostly) indoctrinated high school and college teachers. Understand that most of our founders thought our country would degenerate from a republic, to a democracy, to a kingship (ie dictatorship) within 150 years. What is happening to us today, they predicted at the birth of this country. Read the founders and gain some perspective on how freedom is lost. (the same way freedom has been lost over and over again since the beginnings of human civilization).

Once you do that i don't think you'll find it hard to understand that the sole purpose of socialized medicine is so government can control the quality of each individual's health care. Unless you're part of the ruling class you *lose* under this system by every metric (quality, cost, relationship with your doctor, etc).

Any person that doesn't understand that capitalism requires freedom and that freedom requires capitalism threatens the freedom of all of us. Sorry if that pisses anyone off, but frankly, if you're pissed, you don't understand.



Yep, socialized medicine is crap, that is why citizens in every developed nation that has socialized medicine live longer than Americans. Poor Brits on average live longer than rich Americans. Yeah, socialized medicine is crap, it helps you live longer.




LookieNoNookie -> RE: The End of Prosperity/Fasten your seats, its going to be a bumpy ride (10/8/2008 3:56:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Socialism may or may not be internationalist but it is basically about the ownership
of the means of production and distribution.
Neither Socialism nor totally free markets are the answer IMO.

Socialism falls because when someone else is expected to pay the bill, the fear of failure is removed or moneymay be created waste, indifference and  vested privilege of the bureaucratic classes raise their ugly heads.
Totally free markets tend to oligarchy, monopoly and relative poverty for the masses.

Something slightly left of centre is required backed up with regulatory teeth that bite.
ie a mixed economy allowing the enterprising the rewards of their efforts backed up with
universal provision of health care, education, housing. Things like that.
Look at the disaster that is education for the masses existing in the UK.
Thats what left wing idealogues can achieve.

Attempts to impose economic/social equality should never be considered.


Everyone needs to be careful about words.  They mean something different to different people, and in different times.

Socialism means something entirely different to a people who are hungry, than those who are full...as does nationalism.

(Regardless of how well Google or Websters defines them).





Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625