Rover
Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: leadership527 Fundamentally then, once we accept that it is "nature", we can then get on with business and ignore all those nasty newcomers right? I mean, afterall, as is posted time and time again on these forums, someone cannot possibly be a dominant if they are not already a dominant. How terribly convenient for the incumbents. And all the subs are all perfect in every way so there is no need for anyone to learn -- they've got the magic gene so it's in their nature. I think you're misunderstanding me. The only thing I'm saying is that fantasy is fantasy, and reality is reality. And people as clay to be molded in any way that someone wants, is fantasy. By way of example... let's take your sexuality (or mine, if it makes you feel better). If you're heterosexual (as I am), just how much "training" would be required to make you gay? Not just enough training to make you accept it, or tolerate it. But enough to actually alter your orientation. Any amount? Point is, no one can be *made* into something they are not. If you're new and you're Dominant, submissive, slave, not sure, vanilla, gay, straight... whatever... welcome! But don't come here expecting to be *made* into something, or to do the *making*, cause it isn't gonna happen. Can you grow and evolve? Sure, into your potential and no further. But even that is not *making* you anything you are not... just bringing out in you what already exists. quote:
Saying submission or dominance is "in my nature" is a lot like saying "Lightning strikes trees because it is in it's nature to do so." That is an entirely accurate statement and also fails totally at helping you to build a lightning rod. It'll also get you killed on the golf course. While I am utterly certain that there are "nature" parts to this, ignoring the nurture side leads to lots of idiocy. I do believe I said that nature was not the only factor. Here, let me check... quote:
Although I recognize that we all stand to benefit from recognizing WIITWD as the product of nature (not entirely... just as there is no single gay gene... but in large part), I can say with intellectual honesty that I believe it to be factual. Yep, I said it. Nature is not the only factor, but a "large part". To me that does not ignore the fact that nurture has some influence. But influence alone cannot overcome what nature has born. And whenever you're tempted to think otherwise, ask yourself again... how much training would it take to change your sexual orientation? John
< Message edited by Rover -- 10/9/2008 3:43:28 PM >
_____________________________
"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions." Sri da Avabhas
|