Cyis75 -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (10/14/2008 1:48:56 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterChip2008 I am growing deeply concerned about the sub's and slave's that do not ever reply/respond to message's sent to them by Masters/Mistreess's, not even a polite 'Thanks, but no thanks' would be nice. However, increasingly, I find that its virtually impossible to receive a response from sub's and slave's when they are contacted thru here. A sub/slave's 'duty' is first and foremost 'to serve', this includes, but is definitely not limited to, responding when a Master/Mistress say's something to them...even if the response is in the 'negative'. And yet...there are so very many who just never reply/respond or react in any way whatsoever. Apologizes if someone else has stated what I'm about to but I wasn't going to go through 23 pages to see if it was said or not... From my opinion I can relate to the OP about the rarity of even a polite 'Thanks, but no thanks' response as I myself know that the ratio of messages sent to getting any response is really high. That said I also know from seeing the messages my wife gets as well as hearing from the submissive women I do know and talk with regularly what kind of craziness they deal with and why they would not send any even a polite reply. When I do get a 'no thanks' response I'm almost religious about thanking them and then not bothering them again. Even after meeting one lovely lady at a local munch after having previously received a polite 'no thanks' I was even reluctantly wrote her to days later to say how nice it was to have gotten to meet her at the munch. As to the OP's comments regarding a sub/slave's supposed 'duty'... I guess I'm of a rare breed in that I don't expect any service or respect from someone that is not already serving me than I would afford them. IMHO, just because they identify as a submissive or slave does not automatically make them my and expected to behave in any particular manner to me. Again that's my opinion and as always I would welcome an intellectual debate on the topic arguing differently,
|
|
|
|