RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


kittinSol -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:38:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

My dick is bigger than theirs.



That, it is... for an anteater [8D] .




Lucienne -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:40:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

I don't know that people are obsessed. He has a strong presence on the forum, so it's not surprising that people paying attention to forum dynamics would pay attention to him.

Curious. So..functionally, what's the answer? If engaging in something silly (I was giving out points on internet fora long before I ever got here) somehow merits attention and people wanting to play...do I downplay it to avoid it being construed as some "fragile male ego" thing?



It seems that you have a different question in mind than the one I actually answered, which is why are people obsessed with the points thing. I thought my answer was pretty obvious and unobjectionable. If you have a different question you'd like to ask, I'd be happy to take a crack at it.




NihilusZero -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:40:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

That, it is... for an anteater [8D] .

And, surely you've heard about anteater tongues...




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:42:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

I have noticed that trend, and it does seem as if NZ has been focused on EW lately .  I was wondering the other day why it was that NZ seemed to have something of a hardon for ebondywood.  Which in my sick mind translates into:  NZ has a woody for ebonywoody.  Could just be that my mind is elsewhere......

Find more than 2 threads in the last 2 weeks where I have replied to him. Find more than 4 in the last year.

You won't be able to. Now, or in the future.


Yes, it has been recent and not prevalent, so trend probably isn't a good choice of words.  As a wise and esteemed regular posted already, it is probably speaking more to the fact you both have people  (myself included) who follow both your posts closely.  

The impression I've had, of recent days, is that you seem to be focusing on EW's posts, and engaging him in opposing views.   And yes, my thought was "I wonder what triggered NZ's hardon for EW?" 




Jeffff -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:43:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

Yes, it has been recent and not prevalent, so trend probably isn't a good choice of words.  As a wise and esteemed regular posted already, it is probably speaking more to the fact you both have people  (myself included) who follow your posts closely.   The impression I've had, of recent days, is that you seem to be focusing on EW's posts, and engaging him in opposing views.


No WAY!.... no one does that....:)

Jeffwey





sexyred1 -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:46:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

I have noticed that trend, and it does seem as if NZ has been focused on EW lately .  I was wondering the other day why it was that NZ seemed to have something of a hardon for ebondywood.  Which in my sick mind translates into:  NZ has a woody for ebonywoody.  Could just be that my mind is elsewhere......

Find more than 2 threads in the last 2 weeks where I have replied to him. Find more than 4 in the last year.

You won't be able to. Now, or in the future.


Yes, it has been recent and not prevalent, so trend probably isn't a good choice of words.  As a wise and esteemed regular posted already, it is probably speaking more to the fact you both have people  (myself included) who follow both your posts closely.  

The impression I've had, of recent days, is that you seem to be focusing on EW's posts, and engaging him in opposing views.   And yes, my thought was "I wonder what triggered NZ's hardon for EW?" 



What is the female equivalent of having a hard on for someone? Enquiring minds want to know.




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:46:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

Yes, it has been recent and not prevalent, so trend probably isn't a good choice of words.  As a wise and esteemed regular posted already, it is probably speaking more to the fact you both have people  (myself included) who follow your posts closely.   The impression I've had, of recent days, is that you seem to be focusing on EW's posts, and engaging him in opposing views.


No WAY!.... no one does that....:)

Jeffwey





ARRRGH!  Anyone know a good Pest Control company?  Anyone?




RCdc -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:47:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1[:'(]
Shots for everyone, my treat!! Seriously .dark, I think this is all rather silly, team this and team that, but Aynne's point is well taken.

We are all guilty of following our friends and cliques around, you know that, right?


Totally!  We all stick up for our friends and we all like what we like.  Lushy taught me that one in a discussion we had once and she was cool about it showing me a few years back.  That's what I just said to EbonyWood... he has his followers/fan/mates too... and it's all cool and groovy. 

quote:

No one is going to win since this is not a true battle. As we all keep saying, ITS THE INTERNET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nodnod...

quote:

(although I do think the comments about Team EW vs. Team NZ are cute; they remind me of my nieces fighting over Twilight's Team Edward vs. Team Jacob. We need some hot little T-shirts, then we can add wet t-shirts to the jello wrestling.)


Hey... I can see a rocking franchise coming outta this...

the.dark.




Jeffff -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:48:01 AM)

Pest?... PEST?

Once you go Anteater, you never go back!


Jeff




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:48:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1


quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

I have noticed that trend, and it does seem as if NZ has been focused on EW lately .  I was wondering the other day why it was that NZ seemed to have something of a hardon for ebondywood.  Which in my sick mind translates into:  NZ has a woody for ebonywoody.  Could just be that my mind is elsewhere......

Find more than 2 threads in the last 2 weeks where I have replied to him. Find more than 4 in the last year.

You won't be able to. Now, or in the future.


Yes, it has been recent and not prevalent, so trend probably isn't a good choice of words.  As a wise and esteemed regular posted already, it is probably speaking more to the fact you both have people  (myself included) who follow both your posts closely.  

The impression I've had, of recent days, is that you seem to be focusing on EW's posts, and engaging him in opposing views.   And yes, my thought was "I wonder what triggered NZ's hardon for EW?" 



What is the female equivalent of having a hard on for someone? Enquiring minds want to know.


I dunno, but I say we form an Itty Bitty Clitty Committee and come up with a good word for it!




NihilusZero -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:48:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

It seems that you have a different question in mind than the one I actually answered, which is why are people obsessed with the points thing. I thought my answer was pretty obvious and unobjectionable. If you have a different question you'd like to ask, I'd be happy to take a crack at it.

My question was getting at the underlying reason you gave for why the points have any value (which I find hilarious, considering I'm an existential nihilist).

Either I'm intentionally trying to garner adulation and, apparently, have succeeding and was reaping benefit from the points thread specifically for that reason: in which case I'm guilty of being successful but having a suspicious motive (like, the universal human desire for reciprocal attention).

Or I'm garnering this adulation purely on passive elements that are inherent to my person: in which case I'm guilty of earning the willingly given attention of others honestly and the thread is just a fun game like any of the hundreds of others. Like that FelineFae chick! Where she claims to be the keeper of the "win" in that 'last person to post' thread. Devious chick. It must be us felines.

I digress, however. My question or curious musing, however, is whether any accusations of doing anything for ego/arrogance purposes online actually have any logical merit based on what the person is doing, or whether it all invariably comes down to personal interpretations of actions that, oddly, have to be successful in order to garner the suspicion.




subtee -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:48:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

What is the female equivalent of having a hard on for someone? Enquiring minds want to know.


I'm dripping wet for you, red...[;)]




NihilusZero -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:50:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

...you both have people  (myself included) who follow both your posts closely.

I know of only one person who intentionally follows my posts closely. And I know exactly why she does so.

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

The impression I've had, of recent days, is that you seem to be focusing on EW's posts, and engaging him in opposing views.   And yes, my thought was "I wonder what triggered NZ's hardon for EW?" 

In one thread. But if that's what it takes for me to get a hard on...then maybe I'm in the wrong business and should give kink.com a call.




sexyred1 -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:51:09 AM)

Right....forgot about that. It must be that this thread only stimulated intellectual juices, not the other kind.




RCdc -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:52:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88
Or for fuck sake, I was NOT person that said stalking initially please reread EW's post, and I don't think anyone took it to this level until your outburst. Stalking can have degress, or can it not? Perhaps you might want to save the vitriol for EW who first said thread"STALKING". What is it with this fucking place that the male comments are generally ignored and the attacks go straight to the next female that agrees or says something similar?

Do people still do jello shots? Really? Interesting.


I didnt say you did Aynne.  But I don't see the point of perpetuating it... and I didnt ignore the male comments and posted to them accordingly.  Two things ya can't accuse me off... supporting sexism and racism...(that's supposed to be a lighthearted hint to Ebony that I am still waiting...[:D])

Now lets show these dominants a thing or two about how to get along with lime jello shots... reds buying...[;)]

the.dark.




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:54:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

...you both have people  (myself included) who follow both your posts closely.

I know of only one person who intentionally follows my posts closely. And I know exactly why she does so.

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

The impression I've had, of recent days, is that you seem to be focusing on EW's posts, and engaging him in opposing views.   And yes, my thought was "I wonder what triggered NZ's hardon for EW?" 

In one thread. But if that's what it takes for me to get a hard on...then maybe I'm in the wrong business and should give kink.com a call.



Hmm, I'm pretty sure it was in several different threads, but I'm willing to acknowledge I could be wrong...maybe.  Now I'll probably hve to go back and check. 

(grumbles) no one said there'd be homework.




NihilusZero -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:55:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RCdc

Now lets show these dominants a thing or two about how to get along with lime jello shots...

I was going to say how a virtual version of this may not measure up to the irl personal experiences I've had...

...but I wouldn't want to flash any more arrogance, you know. [:)]




CalifChick -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:56:22 AM)

So anyone wonder what old Chipster is doing these days?

Cali




LaTigresse -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:56:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

I see as more of a fragile male ego thing myself.


My dick is bigger than theirs. But you already knew that.

Ward


Of course it is Ward.

June




NihilusZero -> RE: WHY NO POLITE RESPONSES??? (2/1/2010 11:58:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

(grumbles) no one said there'd be homework.

I can help you.

The thread is here:
http://www.collarchat.com/m_3036435/tm.htm

The only other thread in recent history where I replied to him was in one related to the entire Psychonaut incident (which may or may not still be there, after moderator editing). Ironically, it was a thread where he (EW) and I were actually talking normally, despite having different views of the debacle.




Page: <<   < prev  38 39 [40] 41 42   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875