AAkasha
Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ElanSubdued Akasha, I'm not a Femdom in a relationship with a submissive, but I have been the dominant in relationships with submissives and slaves. Did I ever engage in maintenance topping? Yes. There were times I wasn't in the mood for BDSM play, but I played anyway because my partner needed the sensations, reassurance, and structure. The result was a happier, more well-balanced pet (which had indirect and direct benefits for both of us). quote:
Or, do you simply never top (do bondage, pain games, S&M) unless you are in the mood - he must just wait? In my experience, "making a partner always wait until you're in the mood" might sound dominant (and perhaps kinky) on paper. It might even work for brief periods while in an actual relationship. Over the long haul though, this isn't a great strategy for building and maintaining a long-term relationship. Indeed, as a dominant, there are times I've exercised executive privilege, regardless of whether my girly submissive/slave was in the mood or not. If one continues to do this without some give and take though, the results can be very damaging to the people involved and to the relationship. In any relationship that has endured, there tends to be degrees of give and take, and of maintenance from both the top and bottom. Likewise, there are times when partners are perfectly in sync. I don't consider "maintenance topping" or "maintenance bottoming" as activities that are more for one person than for the other. Rather, these are part of the complex dynamics, communications, and needs that make up human, BDSM relationships - at least, this has been my experience. Elan. Of course any relationship requires compromise. I'm a very giving person - nurturing, affectionate, selfless when it comes to the people that I love. However, I don't fake dominance - I can't just pretend, unless it's a fairly meaningless casual relationship (even then, I can do it in very small doses), and I certainly can't reach inside and top someone lustfully because I am obligated to. In my experience, certain types of submissives don't want this either - they want the real, raw stuff. I don't think it's unrealistic that when it comes to compromise, on the topic of "dominance," the submissive should be the one doing the compromising for the better of the relationship. Dominating out of obligation leads to burn out and resentment and ultimately ruins a relationship. If a man trusts and respects my dominant side, he understands it's better to wait and get the real stuff - it's better for both of us. Needy submissives suck the life out of me. I'm also not talking about relationships with "kinky women" who top once in a blue moon and then pull a bait and switch. Any man who has been with me in a relationship knows my dominant urges come like clockwork. Unless I am dealing with some heavy emotional stuff or incredible tension with work or deadlines, you can mark a calendar by it. For a sub to get needy and push me to dominate him rather than give me the space I need makes me feel like he wants the femdom, not the woman. In a relationship, it's all or nothing - and I don't compromise on my kink, it rubs me the wrong way. I'll have sex when I am not in the mood, give a blow job when I have a headache, go run an errand as a favor if my man isn't up for it - but I won't play make believe with dominance just because he's horny for it. It defeats the purpose. I think most sub men don't want that, either. Akasha
_____________________________
Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995 Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]
|