LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: lobodomslavery Thank you Lady Pact. i have anxiety from time to time time but am not mentally incapable. im glad you appreciate that there is a difference now Thank you kevin I agree. There absolutely is a difference. However, I never said that anxiety, depression, or other illness in the same category was the same as what I consider a mental incapacity. Let Me use an example or two for what I do mean. Just to illustrate, let's say we have a forum poster. We'll call him submissive k. For a period of time, submissive k spent quite a few of his free hours reading about circus monkeys. The circus monkeys fascinate him to no end. After a while, he decides to join a message board that is dedicated to the discussion of monkeys. Once there, the other members of the message board try to convince submissive k that not all monkeys are circus monkeys. Some of the live in the wild, some of them are in the zoo, and some people even have them in their homes. No matter how many people tell submissive k that not all monkeys are circus monkeys, he doesn't seem to understand. For some reason, he can't grasp the concept. Now here's the question. What would you think of submissive k's mental abilities? Would you think this person, who can't be convinced of a simple thing that everyone else understands, to have the capacity to give informed consent as a bottom? I'll ask that the above paragraph be read over, but make the following changes in the text. Replace the word circus with the word professional and monkey with the word dominant. That is the very same concept that people have tried to help you to understand over and over. One more and then I'm through. If person 'a' directs a question to person 'b' and person 'c' reads it and thinks it's directed at him, that's an innocent enough mistake. Actually, with that "in reply to" feature they have here at CM, that's not too unusual. However, if person 'a' tells person 'c' the comment wasn't directed at him, that should suffice. If person 'c' can't be convinced by anyone that he wasn't intended in the conversation, and there seems to be no hope for him understanding this, how would you see that? Just the fact that he can't understand that someone wasn't speaking to him directly? Is that person competent? I'm probably going to get banned for this, as some will see it as a direct attack. It's not. It is, however, a personal guideline for Myself and many others. If a person does not have the ability to give informed consent due to limited mental capacity, they probably shouldn't be playing in this lifestyle. At the very least, they won't be playing with Me. I've said it many times on many other subjects. Just because I'm kinky doesn't mean I don't have morals, standards, or ethics. The decision not to play with those who can not understand simple concepts is one of those. Before Eleven pulls My account, <waves> I'm going to say one last thing. I learned something today. Sure, it was something I already knew, but I'm going to point it out. For a long time, I've called Myself an equal opportunity sadist. I based it on the fact that play partners could be of any race, gender, or orientation. Sounds good on paper, right? Still, it's not the complete truth. I will continue to discriminate on certain facts. Age and mental ability to name just two. I'm good with that. My final remark...... "In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist; And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist; And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew; And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up." When something is wrong, folks, speak.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|