RE: Are we all guys?

RE: Are we all guys? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

Message

GreedyTop -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:22:58 PM)
Last I checked, I'm an innie, not an outtie.

kiwisub12 -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:23:45 PM)
Sounds like it will be a wet party - what with all the drooling going to be going on! [:D]

dvorak83 -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:29:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: oceanwynds Almost everyone has a theory or two. I read your theory and politely give it back to you, since my theory garbage collectors won't be back for another week. Cleaning today, so cant have theories on my floor collecting dust. I guess I forgot the 5th category: submissive women. Stupid me.

dvorak83 -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:32:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CalifChick Well, I'm a number 4, but I must say, any 30-something who actually knows who dvorak is, gets uber geek-hotness points from me. Thanks. But I'm afraid I was thinking of the keyboard designer August Dvorak when I chose my alias, not the composer Antonin Dvorak which you probably were thinking of... But they are related according to Wikipedia. [:)]

kallisto -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:35:03 PM)
Nope. I've looked and I've felt all my parts. Nothing feels like guy parts to me. [:)]

VampiresLair -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:35:17 PM)
So does this mean you actually question just the existence of dominant women?

Lilith13 -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:35:47 PM)
3 and 4 and 5.

dvorak83 -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:44:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact I'm not a guy. I'm really just someone who hires an actress to portray herself at play parties. ???

DavanKael -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:48:41 PM)
OP said: Thanks for the replies. I'll modify my theory accordingly. My theory is that everyone here fall into the following categories: 1. guys 2. guys pretending to be women 3. couples (that's you, leadership527 and QandA) 4. women looking for friends only (that's you, DavanKael) My reply: 1)Nope, still no biological penis attached; damn, the fun I could have with that. Dvorak83, you'd definitely be one of the people on my list to smack with it. < evil, contemplative grin > 2)Hmmmm, still no penis. You think the election results will have any influence on that for me? LIke, if Barak wins, I get a cock? Lol! 3)I've got a coupla cats hanging out with me. The one nearest me has a penis but I've never seen it, however, he's so completely and wonderfully dedicated to me that if he were a human boy, I would marry him immediately even though he would so be a demanding submissive (Oh, wait, gotta wait forthat divorce to become finalized). 4)Not a depthful reader of profiles, now are we, OP?! I don't intend on entering the clergy (Although, hot men dressed as priests do turn me on and they're guys, so they have penises. Okay, off to devote some serious thought to 'corrupting' hot priests). Davan

Barelily -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:49:12 PM)
Hmm maybe more then a bit bitter... 1 submissive does not = stupid 2 It looks as if you are not her dom/Master 3 Speak with respect and you will get the same, whether it be from a sub or a dom 4 Check the name of this forum

CalifChick -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:49:25 PM)
Okay, uber geek hotness points rescinded. You should have quit while you were ahead. Cali

girlygurl -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:49:43 PM)
Nope, no male parts here. girly

dvorak83 -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:53:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CalifChick Okay, uber geek hotness points rescinded. You should have quit while you were ahead. Eh, I DID know about Dvorak the composer. But I thought Dvorak the keyboard designer was a greater man. ;)

dvorak83 -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:55:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VampiresLair So does this mean you actually question just the existence of dominant women? Yes, that would be it.

lronitulstahp -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:56:03 PM)
OOOH!!!! i'm a number 4 too!!!![sm=applause.gif][sm=hearts.gif] ~taken tulip

dvorak83 -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 4:58:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DavanKael 1)Nope, still no biological penis attached; damn, the fun I could have with that. Dvorak83, you'd definitely be one of the people on my list to smack with it. < evil, contemplative grin > Maybe you should get one of them detachable penises? (Or is it peneses in plural?) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQz771qlnxY

dvorak83 -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 5:02:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Barelily Hmm maybe more then a bit bitter... 1 submissive does not = stupid 2 It looks as if you are not her dom/Master 3 Speak with respect and you will get the same, whether it be from a sub or a dom 4 Check the name of this forum Were these points directed to me? I don't understand...? [&:]

JoeStalin -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 5:04:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dvorak83 Is it true? Are we all guys (some of us pretending to be women and the rest of us pretending to be men)? Incorrect. You’re all simulations running on huge underground arrays of super-computers powered by autonomous nuclear fusion power plants with enough deuterium for next 12.5 billion years. i can easily prove it by executing following command: root\milky way\earth>kill dvorak83

dvorak83 -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 5:09:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JoeStalin You’re all simulations running on huge underground arrays of super-computers powered by autonomous nuclear fusion power plants with enough deuterium for next 12.5 billion years. I see. And as in many systems, there are master processes and slave processes. And fake mistress processes.

dvorak83 -> RE: Are we all guys? (11/4/2008 5:10:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JoeStalin i can easily prove it by executing following command: root\milky way\earth>kill dvorak83 I'm still here though. Perhaps I'm a virus.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625