RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Crush -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 5:32:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

And certainly patriotic Americans, after duly electing the choice of the people, would follow their President, at least for his term, yes?

No.

Patriotism can take the form of supporting a good President or opposing a bad one.


Just ask Hillary Clinton ;)






Crush -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 5:39:38 PM)

Come the Revolution, we'll change a few things:

Politicians, Lawyers, and MBAs against the wall.

Term limits for politicians AND for the laws they pass.  My suggestion?  12 years in service to the country for politicians.  25 years maximum for laws before they sunset and have to be reviewed.

I could go on, and have before....





GoddessDustyGold -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 5:52:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: HagiaSophia


As for redistribution of wealth - every single exchange of goods and capital is a "redistribution of wealth". All taxes are redistributed wealth. We collectively and voluntarily collect taxes and we, the people, spend that money on our military, our interstate infrastucture, and our national pursuits like NASA ( a few asides on national agendas - California has a better stem cell program than the Feds, we have no plans to build a new space shuttle, and China is about to pants us in space). All that redistributed wealth creates jobs. That's how we got out of the Depression, we spent our tax dollars at home. 



It is so easy to jusitfy this terminology by so many.
I must disagree with  your assessment that every exchange of goods and capital is a redistribution of wealth.  Technically you could be considered to be correct in a very broad sense.  However, it is *voluntary* to determine where I prefer to spend.  And if I am exchanging like for like, whether it is something that I need or something that I want,  then I am exchanging rather than redistributing.  I earned the money and I can  exchange that countrywide exchange medium for what I want or need.  I am not working and then going home and living for free (having my needs met with no further obligation on my part) in this country the same as everyone else who works or doesn't.  I have more or I have less depending on what I can earn and how I exchange those earnings. 
When redistribution of wealth is being discussed in the current context, it is about equalizing by taking from those who have more to supposedly give it back to those who have less.  And it is all a pretty sounding fallacy in My opinion.    
I have to also question how we are collectively and "voluntarily" collecting taxes when we all have the threat of the IRS breathing down our necks.  I challenge anyone to find a regular wage paying job that will give you the choice of paying your income taxes "voluntarily" or *permitting* your employer to deduct them from your regular paycheck.  Do we really have a choice?  We are so whipped by this system, we no longer give this a second thought.   We just shrug and want to know what it is we get to "take home",
Finally...none of our taxes are going to pay for our military, federal infrastructures or national pursuits such as NASA.  This is what is happening....
 
quote:

1. If we don't pay the income tax how would the country function? The answer to this question is very simple - the income tax revenue does not go towards running the country. On January 15, 1984, the Grace Commission, which is a private sector committee impaneled by President Ronald Regan to find ways to cut government spending found the following: "With two-thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt - all individual income tax revenues are gone before one dime is spent on the service taxpayers expect from government." This money actually goes to pay interest on our federal debt. The federal debt is paid to the Federal Reserve, which is not a part of the government but is a privately owned non-auditable banking cartel. To make it plain, your hard earned money is paid to the Federal Reserve to maintain control over your lives and the lives of countless other human beings on this earth. You can find several Internet sites that clock the federal debt as it rises per second. We currently pay the Federal Reserve over 36 million dollars per hour in interest. Obviously this money isn't going to current owners, but is being put in trust for children that are not even born yet - while you slave away trying to make ends meet.

In addition, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Beardsley Ruml, addressed the American Bar Association during the last year of World War II. The title of his speech was "Taxes for Revenue are Obsolete."  

 
We create new debt to fund all the necessary (and unecessary) federal programs, while attempting and failing to pay off the oldest debt owed to the Federal Reserve.  And please make special note that this is not a federal agency.  It is a non-auditable, private banking cartel.
 
Source:  http://sherrypeeljackson.com/  (a former IRS agent) and there are plenty more sources. 
 
I have been more than concerned for several years already.  I do not see the next four coming up with any potential for improvement.  But I will sit back and see what happens. 
My take?  It will be business as usual in D.C.
 
Edited for two typos and to add that one final thought.





Kirata -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 7:04:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Kirata, your first post was fantastic. I do have one question though, when in a later post you mentioned a preference for a "flat tax" (works for me by the way) do you realise that the rich would actually pay more, if one assumes that the implementation of a flat tax would by necessity mean less tax loopholes the rich traditionally use to avoid paying taxes.

Thank you. I'll have to excuse myself from giving you a direct answer, because I assure you I have no idea what kind of taxes rich people pay. But if everybody pays the same percentage of their above cost of living income, then as far as I can see it's simple and it's fair. The current (and proposed) system is neither, in my opinion.
 
K.
 




slvemike4u -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 7:17:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Kirata, your first post was fantastic. I do have one question though, when in a later post you mentioned a preference for a "flat tax" (works for me by the way) do you realise that the rich would actually pay more, if one assumes that the implementation of a flat tax would by necessity mean less tax loopholes the rich traditionally use to avoid paying taxes.

Thank you. I'll have to excuse myself from giving you a direct answer, because I assure you I have no idea what kind of taxes rich people pay. But if everybody pays the same percentage of their above cost of living income, then as far as I can see it's simple and it's fair. The current (and proposed) system is neither.
 
K.
 
Well my point Kirata was though at times those complaining about a graduated tax system cite a desire for a "flat tax" system,this is often simply a canard used to distract.No one of serious wealth actually wants a flat tax as this would deny them the benifit of availing themselves of all those bright tax lawyers they keep on retainer
BTW I in no way meant to imply you are rich or in any way benifit from such tax loopholes.I have niether the information available nor the inclination to make such an assumption.If I in any way gave such an impression I apologise....I'm not quite the asshole I sometimes come off as.




GoddessDustyGold -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 7:28:42 PM)

~FR~  Well, since there is such a such a small percentage of those who are of "serious wealth" as you put it, if "we the people", meaning the huge percentage of the population who are not of "serious wealth", demand a change to more fair tax system, such as a straight consumption tax, shouldn't we be able to easily get that?
Or are we all so apathetic that we can openly believe that the rich senators and other rich lawmakers and rich puppets/puppeteers are the only ones who can be right and thus we allow the maintainance of the status quo?
By the way...Ron Paul was vocal about his mission to abolish the IRS as well as the Federal Reserve.   
Just sayin'...
I would love to get a peek at the tax returns of Sean Penn and Barbara Streisand, just to name a couple...




slvemike4u -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 7:47:57 PM)

Well I have no idea of what you think my idea of serious wealth is.But those with money would use as much influence that money makes available to them to thwart any attempt at a flat tax.For the very reasons I have cited....a flat tax by definition would remove most if not all of the shelters the rich use to avoid paying their taxes
Just do some math using 10% as your tax base...simple math will illustrate why their are those who would be up in arms at the imposing of a flat tax .It certainly wouldn't be the "middle class" that's for sure.




Kirata -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 7:50:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u
Well my point Kirata was though at times those complaining about a graduated tax system cite a desire for a "flat tax" system,this is often simply a canard used to distract.No one of serious wealth actually wants a flat tax as this would deny them the benifit of availing themselves of all those bright tax lawyers they keep on retainer

BTW I in no way meant to imply you are rich or in any way benifit from such tax loopholes.I have niether the information available nor the inclination to make such an assumption.If I in any way gave such an impression I apologise....I'm not quite the asshole I sometimes come off as.

No problem, I didn't take it that way. I've just been pondering my financial situation lately, that's all. As for the rich paying more than they do now, if that's the case then so be it.

Frankly, as things are, if I was being screwed by being taxed at a higher rate than everybody else, a whole damn lot higher than many, I'd hire lawyers too. My attitude would be, fuck'em if that's how they want to play. So I don't really blame them. When I was self-employed, I paid a tax accountant to help me save as much as I could on taxes.

K.






slvemike4u -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 7:56:51 PM)

Kirata the system is what it is.I have no truck with those whose income necessitates the hiring of a tax lawyer to diminish their tax bill.My compaint is when they  disingenuously complain about their tax rate when in truth after all is said and done the base rate is not in fact what they pay.




Kirata -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 8:22:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Kirata the system is what it is.I have no truck with those whose income necessitates the hiring of a tax lawyer to diminish their tax bill.My compaint is when they  disingenuously complain about their tax rate when in truth after all is said and done the base rate is not in fact what they pay.
 

Okay, I take your point. But still, Mike, rich or not, nobody likes somebody trying to rob them, even if they don't get away with it. I have no way of knowing, of course, but I'm not convinced that the rich would squeal so terribly if they had to pay more under a tax code that was simple and fair. If they did, well, I guess I wouldn't care. But as things are, they have a point. And that bothers me. I want to be able to feel that my country treats people fairly. Everybody. Even the rich.
 
K.
 
 




GoddessDustyGold -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 8:46:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Well I have no idea of what you think my idea of serious wealth is.But those with money would use as much influence that money makes available to them to thwart any attempt at a flat tax.For the very reasons I have cited....a flat tax by definition would remove most if not all of the shelters the rich use to avoid paying their taxes
Just do some math using 10% as your tax base...simple math will illustrate why their are those who would be up in arms at the imposing of a flat tax .It certainly wouldn't be the "middle class" that's for sure.


It doesn't really matter what your or My or anyone's definition of serious welath is.  PE Obama's definition is $250K annually and up.  Or is it $200K...$150K?
What I am understanding you to mean, and please feel free to correct Me, is that "we the people" really don't count in the grand scheme of things.  We cannot demand to have the income tax abolished and go to a straight consumption tax.  We do not have the ability or the means to contact our congressmen (that would be reps and senators) and demand to be heard and served.  The government is supposed to be limited in its powers over the states and the people of those states.  What happened?  (Apathy happened).  Defeatist...
It is a matter of fact that the average person cannot go out and get a job with a paycheck for any employer and not have income taxes, state income taxes and FICA taken out of their paycheck.  There is nothing voluntary about paying taxes.  Any taxes.  If I refuse to pay the taxes on My utility bill I will get My electricity shut off or I will not get a dial tone when I pick up My phone.  I cannot bargain at the sales counter and state I am only willing to pay the actual cost and they should not ring up that sales tax.  I cannot change the numbers at the gas pump and pay only for gas sans taxes.   
My question to you is important.  It sounds like you have given up.  You are saying, and again correct Me if I am wrong, that money, and only money, talks in Washington.  Lobbyists.  Phone calls and letters do not.  Our votes at the polls do not.
Well, I guess most people have that attitude and that is why we are in trouble and just want the almighty hand out.  As one poster said on these boards more than a year ago...(paraphrase) things are not going to change so I just want a bigger piece of the pie. 
He's right.  Things will never change if we do not take back our rights and power over the governemnt.  I am not suggesting an uprising.  But we have so much more at our disposal that we use.  All we have to do is come together and force the situation in a proper way. 
If we don't, I fear for the future of this country when it finally comes home to roost and all the people who are now thinking that this is the only way, will be madder than hell.  
It could get messy. 




subfever -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 10:29:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessDustyGold

By the way...Ron Paul was vocal about his mission to abolish the IRS as well as the Federal Reserve.   Just sayin'...



Well, you may be just sayin', but very few are just listenin'... [;)]




subfever -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/9/2008 10:35:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessDustyGold
  As one poster said on these boards more than a year ago...(paraphrase) things are not going to change so I just want a bigger piece of the pie...


Dangle the carrot, and watch the masses try to bite. 




Musicmystery -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/10/2008 5:25:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: HagiaSophia


As for redistribution of wealth - every single exchange of goods and capital is a "redistribution of wealth".


By that definition, a market economy could not exist.

Ideally, we are exchanging goods and capital of equal value. If we're not, the market should adjust. If it does not, then we're right back to the impossibility of a market economy.

Thus--this line of reasoning is dead out of the gate, unless you want to argue that capitalism is impossible (and that doesn't seem your intent).




Satyr6406 -> RE: Some of you really smart people please explain American democracy to me (11/11/2008 7:09:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

Bullshit. No more taking anything you say as serious, if you are just going to make things up as you go.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Satyr6406

Second. For all the denials and diatribe. I was watching the Stephanopolous show when (then) Sen. Barrack Obama commended Senator McCain for NOT ridiculing his Islamic faith. Stephanopolous quickly corrected him and all was "right with the world, again". 

/quote]

Firstly, Orion, I didn't make anything up the video is easily search-able and found. It happened. I'm a little surprised by your response but, that's a discussion for another time when we can speak privately.
 
As far as it being a slip of the tongue: Of course that's possible. It's also possible that a person that wishes to be elected POTUS knows that they have to portray a certain image. Does any one of us believe that most of our most recent presidents are devoted follower of the faith they claim to be.
 
Growing up, I remember MANY Sunday nights where President Carter was asked a question as he was leaving church - because he was a church-goer.
 
I believe that one who is a certain faith (especially for 20 years) doesn't have such slips of the tongue. That's my belief and the last time I checked, this was still the United States and no one has passed a law against me having my own thoughts and beliefs. Also, while NO ONE has to respect my opinions, they should respect my right to VOICE THOSE OPINIONS. That, of course, is one of the basic tenets upon which this country was supposedly built.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125