RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


scarlethiney -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/12/2008 11:12:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: variation30

quote:

ORIGINAL: scarlethiney

No one doubts your right to have what you want and certainly no one is "telling" you what you can or can't do.  Your assumption that the rest of us place vast importance on your choices is  "silly".


so no one here is opposing my ability to go out and buy a fully automatic rifle?



  You just answered your own question. Someone not agreeing with your choice or not liking it isn't the same as someone trying to inhibit you from acting on your choice. 




Joenextdoor -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/12/2008 11:20:38 PM)

Across the country, there are thousands of gun laws already on the books.  Please tell me what qualifies as "common sense restrictions"?




HunterS -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 6:12:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joenextdoor

Across the country, there are thousands of gun laws already on the books.  Please tell me what qualifies as "common sense restrictions"?

It would seem reasonable to prohibit firing a gun into the air "a la" new years eve celebrations...what goes up must come down.
Shooting from an aircraft.
Shooting from a motor vehicle.
Restricting armed robbers from possessing firearms.
Restricting insane people from possessing firearms.
Restricting children from possessing firearms except under the direct supervision of a responsible adult who is not otherwise restricted from possessing a firearm.
Would you like more or have I made my point?
 
H.





Dnomyar -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 6:21:26 AM)

Hunter you need to expand on your points.

Shooting from a plane?  They have done that since WW1. What about hot air ballons.
Shooting from a motor Vehicle. Mmm tanks, self propelled cannons
Some of the other stuff is already on the books.




lusciouslips19 -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 6:21:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterS

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joenextdoor

Across the country, there are thousands of gun laws already on the books.  Please tell me what qualifies as "common sense restrictions"?

It would seem reasonable to prohibit firing a gun into the air "a la" new years eve celebrations...what goes up must come down.
Shooting from an aircraft.
Shooting from a motor vehicle.
Restricting armed robbers from possessing firearms.
Restricting insane people from possessing firearms.
Restricting children from possessing firearms except under the direct supervision of a responsible adult who is not otherwise restricted from possessing a firearm.
Would you like more or have I made my point?
 
H.




These restrictions will not stop armed robbers who want a gun or an insane person who wants a gun or anyone who really wants a gun. Too bad criminals continue to sell on the black market illegally and will continue to do so. Like I said before restrictions, bans, etc will leave the good abiding citizens unprotected against those who don't abide by laws.




HunterS -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 6:29:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dnomyar

Hunter you need to expand on your points.

Shooting from a plane?  They have done that since WW1. What about hot air ballons.
Shooting from a motor Vehicle. Mmm tanks, self propelled cannons
Some of the other stuff is already on the books.


Is your post  intentionally puerile?  We are speaking here of civil law which is for civilians and does not apply to the military during hostilities...but then you knew that didn't you?

H.




HunterS -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 6:37:19 AM)

quote:

These restrictions will not stop armed robbers who want a gun or an insane person who wants a gun or anyone who really wants a gun. Too bad criminals continue to sell on the black market illegally and will continue to do so. Like I said before restrictions, bans, etc will leave the good abiding citizens unprotected against those who don't abide by laws.


The question was asked ... "what qualifies as "common sense restrictions"?
Do you not think that these fit the description of "common sense restrictions"?
These would prevent convicted armed robbers and the insane from legally purchasing and possessing a firearm...thus when apprehended it adds another criminal charge to their incitement and eventual sentence.  That they bought the firearm on the black market does not diminish the punishment for committing the crime of possessing it.  If in addition it is found to be a stolen firearm then the additional charge of receipt of stolen property is added to the incitement.
How would this affect a non criminal's 2nd. amendment rights?
Do you really think it would be OK for convicted armed robbers and the insane to legally buy a firearm?

H. 




SimplyMichael -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 7:12:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: variation30

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dnomyar

Just what is a assualt rifle?


it's a word our politicians use to inform the public of these dangerous dangerous children/police officer killing machines.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rGpykAX1fo



I would much rather be shot with an assualt rifle than almost any other civilian weapon.  Standard boring hunting shotguns are far more deadly and can be made into handguns with a hacksaw.  Standard boring hunting rifles are more lethal, more accurate, and can shoot farther than many military sniper rifles and can be cut into handguns with a hacksaw.  Hell, there are handguns out there that are more powerful than assault rifles.

Assault rifles, broadly speaking, cannot be sawed down or shortened, unlike almost everything else a civilian can own.  The ammunition they use is in many cases considered to weak and innefective to use against deer. 

Trying to control crime by controling guns is like trying to control the flu by controling tissue paper, they are both symptoms.  Crime is caused by our insane drug laws and an economy that undermines the poor.




Irishknight -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 7:32:55 AM)

You neglect to point out that sawing down a rifle destroys its accuracy.  A sawed off shotgun becomes a close in weapon as its patterning capabilities drop amazingly at what used to be short range for the weapon.  In short, the hacksaw kills the range on rifles and shotguns.
I can barely even begin to address your statement that modern hunting rifles are more dangerous than military sniper rifled.  To actually make that statement accurate would involve comparing weapons from like times throughout history.  I highly doubt that many hunting weapons compare to the .50 caliber sniper rifles used throughout the militaries of the world today.

To say that assault weapon ammo is too weak for deer is both inaccurate and silly.  If an AK47 could not bring down a deer, then it would not bring down a human.  Since that weapon has been the backbone of the majority of rebel fighters and all communist armies for well over 50 years, numbers don't agree with your statement.  Even a .22 long rifle can bring down a deer with one well placed shot and it is far weaker than any "assault rifle."  You might also want to take into consideration old, surplus ammo versus new ammo manufactured for the weapons.  HUGE power difference. 

It truly doesn't matter what you get shot with if the guy on the other end knows where to put the round.

I agree with your statement about trying to control crime by controlling guns.  The only way that is possible is for good people to learn to control their guns well enough to drop the criminals where they stand.




HunterS -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 8:28:47 AM)

The reduced accuracy of a shortened barrel on a rifle or shotgun at the "shithouse" range encountered in home defense is hardly germain to this discussion.  One would only stand in front of a sawed off 12 gauge at ten feet until impact.
Perhaps Michael was referring to FMJ (full metal jacket) which does not have the same impact shock as hollow points or other forms of civilian ammo....if you have read many of his posts he seems quite knowledgeable about firearms and ammo.
I buy surplus military ball ammo for my Springfield and remove the fmj bullets and replace them with more suitable hunting bullets.  It is also illegal most everyplace I know of in the states to use fmj to take any kind of game animal.
 
H.




slvemike4u -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 8:43:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessDustyGold

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

Out of individuals or governments, which group has the most checks and balances on their behaviour?

Individuals.  The checks and balances are called neighbors.

Governments have only their own internal inefficiencies and the capacity of the citizenry to oppose the government to keep their behavior in check.

And of your own free will you have moved your position to one of complete idiocy.Neighbors may now enter into an arms race with the guy that won't curb his dog.Do you read this stuff or just blindly type away.
Earlier I was asked wh I couldn't engage in a reasonable conversation ,defending my views on this issue.....thank you for providing evidence ,I could have never dreamed up.


I do not mean to pick on you, Mike, but I think what you have written here shows clearly the crux of the differences in the thought processes.
I believe that this country was built on the trust that people can be self-governing with limited interference from a centralized government.  You do not.
I see these types of arguments all the time, wherein the extreme examples such as being in an arms race over curbing a dog is considered valid. 
Reasonable restrictions need to ber applied as society grows and safety issues warrant.  But we need to police ourselves and trust that people are, for the most part, reasonable. 
I believe they are and we do not need such excessive regulation. 
You do not and are in favor of having as much as possible regulated.
So long as it fits your comfort level, that is.
What I wrote,when referrencing the neighbor who won't curb his dog,was simply an over the top example meant to mock his interpatation of the 2nd as enumerating an unfettered right to own and possess any firearm he so chooses.CL's and other's position is a claim to complete autonomy in how they choose to arm thmselves.My position is that this  is a rediculous claim,municipalities require registration  and curtail in numerous ways the right of the individual  to posess certain weapons.To own a registered gun and in the same breath claim a literal interpation of unfettered is to deny the regstration itself.




celticlord2112 -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 8:46:06 AM)

quote:

....well, i'm glad that those checks and balances you so admire worked so well at Columbine, among other examples.

Actually, it worked perfectly.

Ignore your neighbors, ignore their pain, ignore what is going on around you, and it will bite you in the ass.

Columbine, and every other spree shooting or other bit of madness, could easily have been prevented if people would get off their lazy asses, step outside their comfortable homes, and actually give a damn about the human beings standing around them, instead of pawning the chore off to some government bureaucracy because "it's not my problem."




celticlord2112 -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 8:56:04 AM)

quote:

CL's and other's position is a claim to complete autonomy in how they choose to arm thmselves.My position is that this is a rediculous claim,municipalities require registration and curtail in numerous ways the right of the individual to posess certain weapons.To own a registered gun and in the same breath claim a literal interpation of unfettered is to deny the regstration itself.

Mike, once again:

I claim the 2nd Amendment guarantees an absolute and unfettered right to own weapons (arms). I claim that the many regulations and restrictions at the municipal, state, and federal levels stand in violation of that right. I claim that the only Constitutional remedy for this is to withdraw said restrictions. I claim that the Constitutional position is an ethically sound and sane position, and I prefer it to the notion of restrictions on weapons ownership.

I would vigorously oppose any effort to amend the Constitution to where weapons ownership were not an absolute right, but if there were such an amendment, I would cease to claim the Constitution guarantees the right of the individual man to arm himself as he pleases.

Claiming that the regulations in place are right because they are in place is the epitome of circular logic. By that same reasoning, you endorse the Patriot Act, the detentions at Guantanomo Bay, Jim Crow laws, "separate but equal", and a whole host of other legislative and regulatory injustices across American history.




Archer -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 9:10:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Irishknight

You neglect to point out that sawing down a rifle destroys its accuracy.  A sawed off shotgun becomes a close in weapon as its patterning capabilities drop amazingly at what used to be short range for the weapon.  In short, the hacksaw kills the range on rifles and shotguns.
I can barely even begin to address your statement that modern hunting rifles are more dangerous than military sniper rifled.  To actually make that statement accurate would involve comparing weapons from like times throughout history.  I highly doubt that many hunting weapons compare to the .50 caliber sniper rifles used throughout the militaries of the world today.

The actual statement was "farther than many military sniper rifles" Most Sniper rifles in use in the military use the 7.62X51 Nato round or the 7.62X 54R russian round not the 50 calibre round.
So Most sniper rifles use a round that is around the same power as a 308 winchester hunting rifle.
There are a plethora of hunting rifles that are much more powerful and shoot farther more accurately
than the 308.

To say that assault weapon ammo is too weak for deer is both inaccurate and silly.  If an AK47 could not bring down a deer, then it would not bring down a human.  Since that weapon has been the backbone of the majority of rebel fighters and all communist armies for well over 50 years, numbers don't agree with your statement.  Even a .22 long rifle can bring down a deer with one well placed shot and it is far weaker than any "assault rifle."  You might also want to take into consideration old, surplus ammo versus new ammo manufactured for the weapons.  HUGE power difference. 

The standard for deer hunting rounds used by the various hunting groups as well as the various fish and game deprtments is you need 1000 ft lbs of energy at the range you shoot the deer to have a reliable humane kill.
Thus the 5.56 NATO round civilian equivolent .223 is too low in energy after about 100 yards, the 7.62 X 39 AK round is under powered at about 200 yards. Where as the 30 06 round debatably most popular hunting round in the US has over 1,000 ft lbs when it reaches the 400 and 500 yard ranges.


It truly doesn't matter what you get shot with if the guy on the other end knows where to put the round.

I agree with your statement about trying to control crime by controlling guns.  The only way that is possible is for good people to learn to control their guns well enough to drop the criminals where they stand.




mistoferin -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 9:27:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Archer
the 7.62 X 39 AK round is under powered at about 200 yards.


Pre-emptively before anyone goes there and jumps all over me......I live in Michigan. This is not Montana or Wyoming where there are huge wide open spaces. I hunt in the woods. I don't think I have ever taken a shot at a deer that was over 80 to 100 yards....most far less than that. I've also never needed to put a second round into a deer that I have shot in order to make the kill. So before anyone goes there....that particular round is effective for the conditions that I choose to take it into.




Archer -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 9:31:30 AM)

True mistoferin the 7.62X39 AK round is perfectly suitable for deer at ranges from 0-200 yards so long as the hunter knows that and keeps their shots within that range it is perfectly OK to use the round for deer hunting. As you mentioned earlier the AK round and the long known 30-30 round have very similar trajectory and power. I hunt mostly with the 30-30 round and limit my shots to 200 yards or less. If the deer is farther away than that I just don't shoot. I'm sure your ethics require the same restraint for yourself.

One would hope that before jumping on you they would read and understand the phrase:
" you need 1000 ft lbs of energy at the range you shoot the deer to have a reliable humane kill."
So the trick is to ethicly select your weapons and shots accordingly.





toledotpeslave -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 9:35:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

quote:

ORIGINAL: variation30

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dnomyar

Just what is a assualt rifle?


it's a word our politicians use to inform the public of these dangerous dangerous children/police officer killing machines.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rGpykAX1fo



I would much rather be shot with an assualt rifle than almost any other civilian weapon.  Standard boring hunting shotguns are far more deadly and can be made into handguns with a hacksaw.  Standard boring hunting rifles are more lethal, more accurate, and can shoot farther than many military sniper rifles and can be cut into handguns with a hacksaw.  Hell, there are handguns out there that are more powerful than assault rifles.

Assault rifles, broadly speaking, cannot be sawed down or shortened, unlike almost everything else a civilian can own.  The ammunition they use is in many cases considered to weak and innefective to use against deer. 

Trying to control crime by controling guns is like trying to control the flu by controling tissue paper, they are both symptoms.  Crime is caused by our insane drug laws and an economy that undermines the poor.


Very smart man.

I'm much rather come up against some idiot with a SKS or frankenstein AR15 than a guy with a bolt action .458 Win Mag.

The only thing a magazine ban will do (and Obama is for that, 90% of Dems are) will get rid of the "wimpy" calibers like 9mm and 40 short and weak and bring back the big boys like 10mm (anyone remember 41 Mag and 41 AE?).




Outlaw85 -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 9:39:45 AM)

Major Edit Note:  Sorry Philosophy, that wasn't all directed towards you, most of that goes towards mike xD  I really did a bad job of making that part clear <_<  I agree with you fully, common sense laws on weapons is perfectly rational.  I don't really want felons having ak-47s neither. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

Out of individuals or governments, which group has the most checks and balances on their behaviour?

Individuals.  The checks and balances are called neighbors.

Governments have only their own internal inefficiencies and the capacity of the citizenry to oppose the government to keep their behavior in check.



....well, i'm glad that those checks and balances you so admire worked so well at Columbine, among other examples.

You see, you're living in an idealised world. Neighbours clearly don't work in the way you suggest. Maybe they could be made to work, but that's social engineering......and you've made it abundantly clear what you think of social engineering.

Now, i'm actually not suggesting that gun control ought to be draconian, far from it. However, the principle you've suggested (that all types of weapons controlled by the government ought to be available to citizens legally) runs into a wall. The society that could be modelled in which that wouldn't lead to the murder of thousands (when Joe Six-packs anthrax barrel blows up accidentally, or when his psychotic younger brother decides to pour it off the top of a clock tower) doesn't exist. Maybe it existed at one point in history, but that point isn't now. If it were then we wouldn't have people shooting up schools or malls would we?

The public ownership of weapons needs some, i say some, common sense restrictions.


and you also are living in an idealised world.   Like they said above, I've noticed it too, people just get irrational at the word gun.  Any other weapon doesn't have that effect, only gun, and it's one of the lesser deadly weapons when consider the randomness of it in comparedness to the precision of a knife.

the sad reality is that the majority of the population, I'd say about 80% are cowards.   You'd rather pass the responsibility onto other people, onto the government.  You've lived far too comfortably and have had too little experience with danger.  You, unlike your ancestors have become soft and incapable of living in a world where you're in mortal danger.    The fact is this,  you will NEVER be safe.  EVER.    Thats it.  You will ALWAYS be in danger of predators, and in this country, even more so due to our culture.  People live in this delusion that they are safe.  They never are.    There was a time when americans realized this and actually stood up for themselves and each other.   And they also  realized that bad things happened.

Massacres have been something we've had to deal with for thousands of years, and through out the entire history of hte united states.  Innocent unarmed people get massacred.   Fact of life.   If you didn't lack criticle thinking entirely, and if you weren't a coward who wants to live under the delusion that it's even possible to remove guns and that you can be safe, you'd realize that guns are nessisary and are always going to be nessisary in this country.  It's just the nature of our culture.   Sadly, you are a coward, and are unable to compete, and therefore make all sorts of demands to level the playing field instead of taking the initiative to arm yourself and take responsibility for your own safety.  It's the same convoluted logic that brings you communism, a bunch of working class stiffs pissed off because they don't have the IQ and the initiative to educate themselves and work their way up the ladder, and thus are unable to compete in a capitalistic survival of the fittest society, and are thus unhappy, thus demanding that no one have property, and that no one be happy, just because they don't want to take personal responsibility for their situation and don't want to compete.  Not that they don't need help and shouldn't be treated equally, but it's the same old story of trading one extreme for another.

And another thing.  School shootings.   Well if people would stop being RETARDED and stop being DELUSIONAL and stop thinking that we're any more than packs of animals fighting over the resources of the savanna, and stop thinking that we as a society have out grown certian things before we actually have.   And stop pressuring the government to make more and more laws to try to control the population that cannot be controlled you'd have less school shootings.

Simply put, it used to be that if you were being bullied in school, you punch the bully in the nose, he stops bothering you, problem solved.   Now a kid goes to jail for it.  It used to be, if someone was being a prick, a good old fist fight would resolve the issue and the police would look the other way.    Now you get caught up in the system that tries to "rehabilitate you"  

well, if you don't let the kids defend themselves in school, they're going to wind up snapping, eventually, and then they're going to shoot someone.   And you all bring it down upon yourselves with your lack of critical thinking and your cowardice.

Frankly I enjoy watching this society burn, I have nothing but contempt for people like you.  

People who are not willing to stand up for themselves, deserve what they get.

"people who sacrifice a little liberty for a little security DESERVE neither and will lose both" -Benjamin Franklin 
the man knew what he was talking about, and now look at how your society crumbles.    I'm not worried though, I can take care of myself.  I'm pretty sure you're fucked though.




toledotpeslave -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 9:52:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

FR

...if the argument is that US citizens ought to have access to the same level of weaponry available to the US government, do those who support that idea also support the idea of privately owned nuclear, bacterial and chemical weapons? In other words, should Joe Six-Pack have the right to own WMD's?


At the very least, citizens should be allowed to own any weapon that is in police inventory.

Those on the anti gun Left would soil themselves if they saw what was in the H&K LE catalog.




slvemike4u -> RE: Gun Sales Up Since Obama Election Victory (11/13/2008 9:53:42 AM)

And once again the argument for gun control is made,and in a most compelling way,by those opposed to same.That was some rant Outlaw,I for one thank you for it."didn't lack critical thinking entirely"...please do all of us a favor ,re-read you post while applying,if possible,some of that critical thinking you accuse others of lacking.Sadly in your case I don't believe this exercise will bear any fruit....
CL a question if I might,have you ever registered a gun,applied for a license,suffered a waiting period.Or rather have you bought all your weapons in a dark alley from some right wing militia wacko.If the former rather than the latter...than I submit you have allready ceded the very authority you claim the government does not possess.How do you rationalise these conflicting facts..




Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875