stella41b -> RE: Should men be responding to Ask a Mistress? (11/18/2008 8:26:07 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FloridaMistresse My reply is simply this: I have responded to this already. I stated: I respectfully asked for "A Mistresses" reponse. If you identify as a Mistress then respond. I did not say what type of spirit you needed to be. If you are by some chance a male submissive that identifies as a Mistress ( which apprently there are several on here) then respond. It was a simply request, that was and I quote "denied" Do I own this board, NOPE. Do I claim to NOPE. Did I think the request was simple and innocent enough. YUP. Did I intend or think it would create the malestrom it did. Hell NO! LOL No matter how enlightened the male just does not know what it is like to walk in the females shoes. and vice versa. This of course excluded MTF, FTM I am not going to get into that as it is a whole other issue. Just as I do not know what its like to be a man, or a drug addict, or black. I would never even hesitate a guess as to what its like to be discriminated against just from the color of My skin. So, do men not know what it is like to be a Mistress. They think they can relate or have a "good" response to Our issues, however, they do not really know what W/we face. Nor do I know what it is like to be a male submissive. It would just be speculation on My part. What this thread really smacks of to Me is what I and many other gay women get from men constantly: "Oh you really would enjoy sex with me if you tried it. you do not know what your missing honey, you need a real man to fix that itch baby. Oh Mistress I would please you like no one else ever has I promise. " Just as I do not have to justify why I do not want sex from a man, I see no need to justify why I did not ask for "advice or insight" from a man. It's funny to Me that they(men) all felt like they had something valuable to lend. Did any of them ask? NOPE. They just made the decision for themselves. Then it became about freedom, and bias, and property of CM etc etc etc. The crux was this, a Mistress asked for other Mistresses feedback and men jumped all over it. Period. Is that right or wrong? Y/you all have made your personal decisions. Thank you for that. I will bear this in mind this coming Thursday when on behalf of the sLGBT group I'm running I make another speech to wider society advocating support, cooperation and mutual respect between people irrespective of their gender and sexual orientation. FloridaMistresse you may wish to feel persecuted and that is your own personal wish which is to be respected, and you may wish to divide and exclude, and this is also your own personal wish to be respected, but the boards of these forums is not the appropriate environment for such divisions and there are many lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgendered who are sick and tired of being persecuted and excluded. The question you actually posed in your original thread was about D/s in a relationship which was becoming vanilla, which to me had nothing to do with being a woman, nothing to do with being a lesbian, and everything to do with being either a dominant or a submissive. However in choosing to exclude male POVs you chose to also make it an issue about gender. Then you write: What this thread really smacks of to Me is what I and many other gay women get from men constantly: "Oh you really would enjoy sex with me if you tried it. you do not know what your missing honey, you need a real man to fix that itch baby. Oh Mistress I would please you like no one else ever has I promise. " Now FloridaMistresse I get this too - that same unwanted sexual attention from men - furthermore in the course of my work I have been sexually assaulted twice by men, however unlike you it seems I do not allow this to colour my perception of other men or of every other man I come across whether it be online or real time. And here I know I speak for many lesbian women including those among the people who voted me in and elected me to run this sLGBT focus group I am running and to represent the LGBT community here in West London. Therefore I do understand and sympathize with your issues concerning men, but I in no way support either your crusade against men nor your wish to bring division and exclusion to these boards. If people are inclusive towards you why can't you be inclusive back? Why all the drama over what appears to be such a trivial point anyway?
|
|
|
|