celticlord2112
Posts: 5732
Status: offline
|
quote:
Seems I set off a real argument on CL's rebellion thread when I characterised Collins and the IRA as a terrorist organisation. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. There is little doubt that, in parts of the Middle East, the al-Qaida and Hamas suicide bombers are martyrs to a cause, and those who send them forth patriots and saintly followers of Allah (note, I am being neither sarcastic nor facetious when I say this; that we perceive these same individuals far less favorably does not alter the perceptions of others elsewhere). What must be fairly stated, mike, is that "terrorist", as we see the term used today, is a perjorative--good men are not terrorists, and terrorists are not good men. Moreover, terrorism is in the eyes of the beholder: quote:
The United States Department of Defense defines terrorism as “the calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.” By this definition, a great many people arguably qualify as "terrorists"--including, as has been said, our own Founding Fathers as well as the esteemed Michael Collins. Yet we do not call George Washington a "terrorist"--certainly I do not. Why is this? Because George Washington helped bring this country into existence. Similarly, Michael Collins did much to bring about the modern nation of Ireland. Thus many do not count Michael Collins as a "terrorist".
_____________________________
|