Aneirin
Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006 From: Tamaris Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: missturbation Watching tv today and there was a debate about whether lap / pole dancing exploited or empowered women. The common belief was it exploited them because of the seedy background most people believe exists in the clubs where the women work. Amazingly drugs were only mentioned once, a lot of the decision seemed to rest on the fact that the women in the clubs were probably having sex with the customers. It appeared that if you took the sex out of the equation the people in the debate would be perfectly ok with women being lap dancers. So now i'm curious as always as to what you think. If lap dancers, escorts, and pro d types and s types are definately NOT having sex with their customers is it an ok career choice? Do you think WITHOUT sex being involved it empowers women or exploits them? Why? Does your answer change if sex becomes involved? Why do people need to be empowered, a job is just a job, a means to earn money to live. Others might get more out of employment, but the bottom line is money to survive. I don't buy this thing where people are 'forced' into doing something as a job, addiction type scenarios might be different, but if there are people around seeking to ask questions about empowerment for so called 'sex trades', they would be better off helping people to get out of these situations rather than write papers about it and impose their views on everyone else. Perhaps it is the feminists that are making the noise, the same people who identified and coined the phrase, 'The Male Gaze', quite rightly so, art, advertising etc has traditionally been to empower the male point of view, but that has largely changed, the feminist movement has caused change and centuries worth of change in just a few years. What do they seek now, a complete reversal. I am currently reading 'The Female Gaze' by Loraine Gamman and Margaret Marshment, so far it is proving interesting. I always like to get another viewpoint on things. But given I like another viewpoint, then perhaps these academics who debate so much on TV, might like to get the viewpoint of the actual people involved and take what they say, not discard because they have a degree in whatever social science, i.e. they believe they know better.
_____________________________
Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone
|