LadyConstanze -> RE: Femdoms: How important are your orgasms? (11/24/2008 8:32:38 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AAkasha It seems there are a lot of femdoms that have the viewpoint that submissives don't get to give them orgasms. Yet for male subs, the prospect of giving their domina this pleasure is the ultimate carrot. Subs - if you know you will *never* be able to give your femdom an orgasm, does that make you less likely to serve her? How about if you know you are able to make her wet and turn her on, but will never get to see the act through to completion. Aside from cuckolds, it seems the potential submissive pool may be smaller if you take orgasms (for her) off the table. True? Dominant women -- are you able to happily get very turned on, get wet, without having an orgasm, after dominating your submissive partner? Or do you not only take orgasms off the table, you take sexual arousal off as well? Akasha I am not quite clear on the femdom thing, unless you mean a female dominant. If a sub thinks the only way of giving me pleasure is an orgasm, then that is too narrow minded for me anyway and I'm simply not interested, in fact, letting a sub give me orgasms because he expects it, wouldn't that be rather submissive? Actually if I would have to "pay" with my orgasms, I'd rather give up BDSM completely. The pool of potential subs isn't too small anyway, even if I take my orgasms away, and yes, I can get turned on without wanting to be sexually serviced by a submissive, but it's actually not what draws me to BDSM, arousal and orgasms are something that you can get fairly easy, good BDSM is much more of a challenge.
|
|
|
|