Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 8:06:47 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

~FR~

Let's clarify one other persistent point.

The Fed is "a private bank" only in the strictest of interpretations. First, unlike any true private bank, it's purpose is not to earn profit, as it can simply create money, usually through open market operations, but also through printing currency (not the same as money). It's shareholders for each of the twelve districts are the national banks in that district (they are required to do so). Yet these shareholders don't run the Fed; instead, the Fed oversees their operations, sets reserve requirements, sets interest rates among them.

It is, in short, a federal agency. It operates independently, unlike other federal agencies. But to insist that it's some private institution reaping profits for investors is incorrect.

I hope that helps.

Sorry, it doesn't at all. Can't have it both ways...a federal bank that is 'independent.' Either it IS federal and under federal control OR it is private and does whatever it wants. Yes the fed IS private in every sense of the word...it is making a profit at the current federal funds rate lending us our currency through its member banks. It never prints (orders to treasury) currency anymore but instead has the federal power (again, in a private interest) to print up T-bills and issue them as collateral for borrowing their currency.

The fed sells (now gives) the T-bills to member banks upon which it earns interest while the taxpayer makes good on the 'T-paper.'

One former IRS agent and now financial and tax consultant has estimated that the fed is taking in $36 million/per HOUR in interest.

One more thing Music...there really is no such thing as a 'private' bank. When forming a bank I must subscribe to all federal laws and form my capital basis by purchasing T-Bills and paying the current fed funds rate for it.

I, now Mr. Banker...make money by lending it out at about 4-5 times that rate. (I by entitlement, have any private deposits insured by the taxpayer) So every bank starts out this way and holds a large portfolio of T-Bills or you are not a federal member bank and would enjoy no such borrowing or insurance benefits.

The only private ownership of retail banks is in the stocks. When was the last time you saw a bank that hasn't gone public ? It must do so to get debt-free capital and then market for private deposits (CD's).

Banks grow ONLY by acquiring other banks (there is little or no real competition) by a leveraged or hostile takeover via purchasing its stock. Banks are now formed with the whole idea of being acquired by a bigger bank...not to compete on terms but mostly service.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 11/27/2008 8:26:30 AM >

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 8:09:45 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

OK hunky, you borrowed ten grand to buy silver as a hedge against inflation, but silver has gone down. If you know about the fed you should know about the UCC. I am excercising my option to accelerate at will, and you must pay back the money now. You have five days to come up with it or you are in default. That means negative equity in your house and none of your cards work anymore.

Well that's what happens to the country if the fed is abolished. Like I said in a healthy economy with low debt and a decent sustainable GDP it would be a hard hit for the government to come up with that figurative ten grand. Right now there is no money in the mattress. The crops have died and the factory burned down.

T



First off- the paper market is fixed. 

I have shifted silver/gold into real metal in hands ..but the delivery is taking forever!

the mark up on real silver/gold is minimun 20% in some cases 110%. 

I do hold silver and gold stock.  I was in then out, now back in.  In a brief time up 6% on wheaton silver mines, and 1% on a gold ETF.

there are no credit cards tied to my house.  NONE.   there is a 30 year fixed 5.5%  modest mortgage that even if the house has no value is cheaper then rent.  in fact, my payment just went DOWN to $240 a month, PMTI.     It would not pay me to rent 1 room out at $240.

the thing is-  the currency value goes DOWN, the gold value does not change.

see king tut. see king midas. see money changers. see temple

pretty woman do not wear $100 bills on their body.  nor do most wear quarter, dimes, nickels or pennys.
what do the ladies adorn theself with???

remind me that tommorrow, black friday- that I am supposed to go to aldis and buy some food to start stocking up..

ending the fed, which has never been audited, would be in phazes.    there is NO GOLD in the vault.  UNDERSTAND that!

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 8:14:38 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

~FR~

Let's clarify one other persistent point.

The Fed is "a private bank" only in the strictest of interpretations. First, unlike any true private bank, it's purpose is not to earn profit, as it can simply create money, usually through open market operations, but also through printing currency (not the same as money). It's shareholders for each of the twelve districts are the national banks in that district (they are required to do so). Yet these shareholders don't run the Fed; instead, the Fed oversees their operations, sets reserve requirements, sets interest rates among them.

It is, in short, a federal agency. It operates independently, unlike other federal agencies. But to insist that it's some private institution reaping profits for investors is incorrect.

I hope that helps.

Sorry, it doesn't at all. Can't have it both ways...a federal bank that is 'independent.' Either it IS federal and under federal control OR it is private and does whatever it wants. Yes the fed IS private in every sense of the word...it is making a profit at the current federal funds rate lending us our currency through its member banks. It never prints (orders to treasury) currency anymore but instead has the federal power (again, in a private interest) to print up T-bills and issue them as collateral for borrowing their currency.

The fed sells (now gives) the T-bills to member banks upon which it earns interest while the taxpayer makes good on the 'T-paper.'

One former IRS agent and now financial and tax consultant has estimated that the fed is taking in $36 million/per HOUR in interest.



keep in mind that places like liberty silver set up,  the feds come and kick the doors in a seize it all.  

why?


by their own admission, they are not capable of handling the money supply...and that is the fiat money.  just imagine how the gold in the vault was "handled".  that is why bernacki would not answer ron pauls question if he had ever thought of a gold based curecny. he cant think of that- because we do not have any!

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 8:37:31 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

~FR~

Let's clarify one other persistent point.

The Fed is "a private bank" only in the strictest of interpretations. First, unlike any true private bank, it's purpose is not to earn profit, as it can simply create money, usually through open market operations, but also through printing currency (not the same as money). It's shareholders for each of the twelve districts are the national banks in that district (they are required to do so). Yet these shareholders don't run the Fed; instead, the Fed oversees their operations, sets reserve requirements, sets interest rates among them.

It is, in short, a federal agency. It operates independently, unlike other federal agencies. But to insist that it's some private institution reaping profits for investors is incorrect.

I hope that helps.

Sorry, it doesn't at all. Can't have it both ways...a federal bank that is 'independent.' Either it IS federal and under federal control OR it is private and does whatever it wants. Yes the fed IS private in every sense of the word...it is making a profit at the current federal funds rate lending us our currency through its member banks. It never prints (orders to treasury) currency anymore but instead has the federal power (again, in a private interest) to print up T-bills and issue them as collateral for borrowing their currency.

The fed sells (now gives) the T-bills to member banks upon which it earns interest while the taxpayer makes good on the 'T-paper.'

One former IRS agent and now financial and tax consultant has estimated that the fed is taking in $36 million/per HOUR in interest.



keep in mind that places like liberty silver set up,  the feds come and kick the doors in a seize it all.  

why?


by their own admission, they are not capable of handling the money supply...and that is the fiat money.  just imagine how the gold in the vault was "handled".  that is why bernacki would not answer ron pauls question if he had ever thought of a gold based curecny. he cant think of that- because we do not have any!


Yes there is and by one estimate that between the NY fed bank and Fort Knox where it isn't really kept...we have approx. $1 trillion in gold...yes actual gold. It depends however what the speculators say so...subject to change.

It has also been estimated (seems there is so much of our banking and economy is secret for national security ?) that we only have $2 billion dollars of actual currency in circulation.

That's why Citigroup went to FARC in Columbia to seek their drug cash. FARC in its everlasting wisdom...said no. So Citigroup bought a small Columbian bank ($12 million) to 'legally' launder that cash and bring it back to NY.

Anerica is bordering on having a cash shortage what with so much going out for oil, to China and the drug cartels.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 8:51:31 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
MrR, I will not engage in an argument that we have a trillion in gold as I haven't looked into it. But I would like to say; does anyone realize what an infinitesimal drop in the bucket that is these days ?

It may seem like alot, but it's not.

T

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 9:01:20 AM   
MzMia


Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
......edited from Mr. Rogers reply....
 Sorry, it doesn't at all. Can't have it both ways...a federal bank that is 'independent.' Either it IS federal and under federal control OR it is private and does whatever it wants. Yes the fed IS private in every sense of the word...it is making a profit at the current federal funds rate lending us our currency through its member banks. It never prints (orders to treasury) currency anymore but instead has the federal power (again, in a private interest) to print up T-bills and issue them as collateral for borrowing their currency.

The fed sells (now gives) the T-bills to member banks upon which it earns interest while the taxpayer makes good on the 'T-paper.'

One former IRS agent and now financial and tax consultant has estimated that the fed is taking in $36 million/per HOUR in interest.

One more thing Music...there really is no such thing as a 'private' bank. When forming a bank I must subscribe to all federal laws and form my capital basis by purchasing T-Bills and paying the current fed funds rate for it.

I, now Mr. Banker...make money by lending it out at about 4-5 times that rate. (I by entitlement, have any private deposits insured by the taxpayer) So every bank starts out this way and holds a large portfolio of T-Bills or you are not a federal member bank and would enjoy no such borrowing or insurance benefits.

The only private ownership of retail banks is in the stocks. When was the last time you saw a bank that hasn't gone public ? It must do so to get debt-free capital and then market for private deposits (CD's).

Banks grow ONLY by acquiring other banks (there is little or no real competition) by a leveraged or hostile takeover via purchasing its stock. Banks are now formed with the whole idea of being acquired by a bigger bank...not to compete on terms but mostly service.
[/quote]


Thank you Mr.Rodgers for explaining very well a system that
for many of us until lately has been a mystery.
Many people are taking quite an interest in politics, economics, and
how the government works these days, and that is a great thing.

< Message edited by MzMia -- 11/27/2008 9:03:32 AM >


_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain


What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 9:09:48 AM   
Dominatist


Posts: 87
Joined: 7/18/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

MrR, I will not engage in an argument that we have a trillion in gold as I haven't looked into it. But I would like to say; does anyone realize what an infinitesimal drop in the bucket that is these days ?

It may seem like alot, but it's not.

T

Nobody knows...we are not allowed to know. It does seem however that having only a few $billion of cash actually in circulation...we could back that currency by gold or silver and very easily. (there are estimates we have only $600 or as little as $400 billion in gold)

The problem with that is as we know in the house of cards that we have built with our form of 'capitalism' if everybody wanted their money in cash...it ISN'T there.

So why bother with a gold or silver standard that does not serve the bankers ?

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 9:16:46 AM   
rexrgisformidoni


Posts: 578
Joined: 9/20/2008
Status: offline
I vote we use the pretty rocks we find on the sidewalk sometimes as currency. and abolish the fed, let the banks raise their own capital for funding of accounts and loans, and let/make people actually research the solvency of a financial institution. anyhow thats my idea. 

_____________________________

when all you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like nails

“I am the punishment of God...If you had not committed great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.”

Genghis Khan

(in reply to Dominatist)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 9:38:30 AM   
UncleNasty


Posts: 1108
Joined: 3/20/2004
Status: offline
Occam's Razor:

"All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best." Alteratively "One should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything."

I always think discussions over what is and isn't "money" are overly complicated. From time to time I even participate in complex discussions. But my foundational thoughts and feelings are pretty simple. Kind of like the work I do and the tools I use to do it. The closer it is to simplicty the less "breakdownable" it is.

Regarding "money" it reduces to a simple question. Does the money I saved X years ago (call it wealth if you like) buy the same goods and services today?

If the answer is "Yes" then as long as I work hard, earn more than I spend, I will prosper. A good thing.

Any answer to that question other than "Yes" is in my mind an indication that something is wrong. A bad thing.

Since the mid 40's our currency has lost more than 90% of its purchasing power, or value, or its utility as a store for wealth. I fail to see how adding more layers of complexity solves that most basic problem.

One handed Uncle Nasty

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 9:40:34 AM   
celticlord2112


Posts: 5732
Status: offline
quote:

Since the mid 40's our currency has lost more than 90% of its purchasing power, or value, or its utility as a store for wealth.

When did currency ever have either value or utility as a store for wealth?


_____________________________



(in reply to UncleNasty)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 12:47:56 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
this is what happens when too much currency is printed. THIS is our future.  5 minutes vid  reduced a vid to illustrate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6fJht5KVTw


JP MORGGAN has 93 trillion in dirivatives.

http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/8036/banksnb6.png


< Message edited by pahunkboy -- 11/27/2008 12:58:11 PM >

(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 1:01:03 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

Since the mid 40's our currency has lost more than 90% of its purchasing power, or value, or its utility as a store for wealth.

When did currency ever have either value or utility as a store for wealth?



in that case, I will buy all of your coins (quarters, dimes, 1/2 dollar and dollar) that are pre 1965.   Ill even give you 10% more then face, and I will pay shipping. 

(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 1:24:47 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

in that case, I will buy all of your coins (quarters, dimes, 1/2 dollar and dollar) that are pre 1965.   Ill even give you 10% more then face, and I will pay shipping. 


I will take that deal.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 5:16:27 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9t-MgtQ41c&feature=channel     check this out.  Ron Paul from 1988.   notice how we so forget our history?   the then bail out of continental IL,  the candor in this clip- is time tested. 

must see.   it will demonstrate just how controlled we are to forget about the past..in so far as wealth is redistributed.  how the tactics are the same but magnified

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 5:23:22 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Ah. Does this mean the deal's off?

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 5:26:54 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

this is what happens when too much currency is printed. THIS is our future.  5 minutes vid  reduced a vid to illustrate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6fJht5KVTw


JP MORGGAN has 93 trillion in dirivatives.

http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/8036/banksnb6.png


Yes, the capitalist naturally turns to fascism. It has been estimated that the entire Rothchild's banking and family network of finance and industrial ownership approached $1 trillion BEFORE the industrial revolution of the early 20TH Century.

It has been suggested that ALL of this began in 1695 with the formation of the Bank of England and whose owners later but prior to Wilson's election of 1912 was behind the creation of our Fed.

Wilson's right hand man and political and economic and financial advisor was an english banker and working with the bank owners...got Wilson to sign the bill to create the fed.

"“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men.
 
We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world - no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”

-President Woodrow Wilson

"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the Fed. The Fed has cheated the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the Nation's debt...
 
The wealth of these United States and the working capital have been taken away from them and has either been locked in the vaults of certain banks and the great corporations or exported to foreign countries for the benefit of foreign customers of these banks and corporations. So far as the people of the United States are concerned, the cupboard is bare.

"When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here.

A super-state controlled by international bankers and industrialists... acting together to enslave the world... Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is -- the Fed has usurped the government."

Congressman Louis T. McFadden, Former Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency

It has been suggested (rumored at the time) that when falling ill after a dinner party that he had been poisoned and thus the 3rd attempt to assassinate him was the charm. He had been composing articles of impeachment for the federal reserve board.


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/27/2008 6:47:22 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
So MrR, you have not made it clear whether or not you advocate the abolishion of the fed. I know what they are and sort of who they are. That family name is actually Maher, but they changed it to Rothchild some time ago, which means red shield in German. For what reason I don't know.

Abortion is a bad thing, but we need it because if a stop is put to it, we will have worse problems.

Prisons are a bad thing, but we need them. Let all the criminals out and it's basically all hell breaking loose.

However if there had never been prisons, anyone who deserved to be there would either be dead, hunted or living outside of society, like in the woods or something.

In other words we have grown dependent upon certain things, for better or worse. For all the talk of malfeasance or whatever else in the fed, they are singularly efficient in one task. That task is to forestall a real financial crisis, one that should have happened about 70 years ago but did not.

I think it would've been much better handled back then, when we produced our own cars, food and industrial machines. We can't do that anymore so now is not a good time.

T

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/28/2008 5:57:19 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
T,  the name was changed as the club house was "house of rothschild".   I suspect the name was changed for pomp, but also for anomonity... such is how coprorations can hide a mans ID.

undertstand that the US money ship is sinking. it can not be saved.   it is not per mortgages. it is directives. a few ppl lied to get the mortgages, but this is a front.

if the govt handled the money- it could charge itself the 2%.   but being we outsource this- a private group of men puts this 2% in their private offshore pocket.

this fed reserve could be phazed out incrementaly. it has never been audited.  even rush limbaugh said that alan greenspan was not propert to sit with bill clinton back in the 90s.  (I heard him on radio where I then worked)

no matter how we re-shuffle the cards- we only have so many capacity.   

one problem is that hardly anyone knows what the fed res is.

i wonder how long you or I would be allowed in their building.

of course, the ron paul fans will get the blame when things get violent.      ...now understand that teh COMEX is very fixed right now.   some players are going to demand their futures in december.   this will  bring the paper gold UP, more on par with real gold.   it could be a stratosphere take off.   and it could even collapse the dollar. 

in the past week or so- gold has de-coupled from oil abit.  so the tenseness is in the air.

when the COMEX hits the fan- it will be big.  the COMEX has sold gold it does not own.   Gee, imagine that.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/28/2008 10:12:09 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

one problem is that hardly anyone knows what the fed res is.


What complete nonsense.

The Fed, its shareholders, its purpose, its oversight---all are perfectly clear.

Instead, you've drawn your warnings from a Baptist minister and Rush Limbaugh, both clearly major experts in the financial/economic world. Then you add yet another prosperity prospect.

These alarmist financial sites are PLAYING you (and certainly not just you) for their own gain.

Or do you suppose they take a break from their financial empires from a philanthropic impulse to spread the wealth?

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act - 11/28/2008 11:01:33 AM   
celticlord2112


Posts: 5732
Status: offline
quote:

These alarmist financial sites are PLAYING you (and certainly not just you) for their own gain.

Of course, the possibility that the government is doing the same thing.....that could never be the case, could it?

Shouting fire in a crowded theater is a bad idea.....unless there really is a fire.  Sometimes there's good reason to be alarmed.  Are you quite certain there isn't such reason now?


_____________________________



(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: H.R2755, Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109