TreasureKY
Posts: 3032
Joined: 4/10/2007 From: Kentucky Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MadRabbit ... On one hand, there is the pursuit of a caricature. An ideological and nuanced vision in my mind of what the perfect partner is. ... Abandoning the ideology, the caricature, and the ideal and simply just accepting the person for the person. Just finding someone you connect with in some way and working out the rest. - Which methodology do you take to finding a partner?
- How do you deal with the potential negatives of that ideology?
- Or is there a middle ground between the two that you have found?
- Or maybe there is a third separate methodology that I am completely missing?
A somewhat belated response, nevertheless... First, I'd like to clarify that, to me, there is a difference between "perfect" and "perfect". There is perfect as in "without defect or blemish", and I think most here would agree that everyone has flaws; then there is perfect as in "precisely accurate or exact", which I believe would most likely be how one might describe some ideological partner that meets a list of criteria. While I have never envisioned in detail my "perfect partner", over the years I have developed an understanding of both what I want and what I need in a partner. The vast majority of that criteria revolves around philosophical belief and emotional nature, so there has never been some idealized caricature that potential partners have had to be measured against. I have, however, used that understanding as a tool in finding my perfect partner... and quite successfully, too. I do realize that many here have taken great pride in declaring that they do not "seek", but merely live life and allow their partners to "fall into their lap". Well, not me. I'm afraid I just don't get out enough or meet a sufficient number of people that I would have had any luck, whatsoever, in finding even a decent partner, let alone the ideal one that I've found. It seems to me that "settling" (to be either alone or in a less than ideal relationship) is more likely to happen when you have a smaller pool of possibilities. I can say with absolute certainty that I would never have met Firm had I not been here on CM, actively seeking. Regarding the potential negatives, I admit that by refusing to settle, you do naturally reduce your possibilities greatly... though I cannot personally testify to suffering any difficulty as I was most definitely more fortunate than most. For the short time I was seeking and before I met Firm, the problems I did have were more along the lines of trying to obtain truthful information. I never tried to make a square peg fit into a round hole, but I did have difficulty at times trying to find out if who I was talking to was a round peg or a square peg. Of course, holding a potential at bay while trying to get to know them well enough to decide if they really are a potential has its own special set of issues. Learning to read people quickly can save you a lot of headaches. Probably the most important aspect of employing this "vetting" method would be to have first, a very deep understanding of yourself. Then a very realistic appraisal of what type of person is both compatible and complimentary to you will help to develop your criteria. Realistic is the operative word here; if runway-model good looks or a wallet the size of Donald Trump's heads up your list, you're in for a lot of long, lonely nights. I do think that the middle ground exists in that realistic approach to deciding upon criteria. Limiting your list to only those character traits that mesh best with your own, and maybe one or two other characteristics that you consider very, very important, can be a very pragmatic approach. I think also that taking the time to get to know people well enough to decide if they match your ideological goals is also giving you plenty of opportunities to just enjoy people for who they are. So maybe Mr. or Miss Right doesn't really match your idea of Mr. or Miss Right after all... but you've had a few fun dates and some enjoyable company in the meantime. You're just living your life and getting on with things, aren't you?
|