Vendaval
Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005 Status: offline
|
Rather than hi-jack the Caroline Kennedy thread I am starting a new one here. Music Mystery really hit the nail on the head with this statement. I do not think that complete political novices should start at the top of the dog pile nor that entrenched pork-barrel pros should run everything. Where is the happy medium? How about combining experience with good ethics and accountability? Why is that so much to ask for in America? Is it because we are addicted to the sound-byte and instant-fix-it methodology? Pop a pill or buy some software or find someone else to do the dirty work via out-sourcing? What does the discontent with our political process and leaders say about our society? quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery ~FR~ While I also look to qualifications, I'm struck by the dichotomy invoked by discussions of who should lead. One the one hand, proven experience--though that "experience" is often parsed beyond credulity. But then, we want not old school insiders, but fresh voices, people of the people. Both reasonable arguments, but both get stretched in self-serving ways to accommodate the speaker at the moment.
_____________________________
"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light. So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that great day, I will tease you all the same." "WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE http://KinkMeet.co.uk
|