Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MzMia I do agree with one point you have made, Merc. PE elect!!! Who has been the President the last 8 years that has allowed this situation to occur and get progressively worse on his watch?? I knew a few months ago that there would be people like you, that would blame PE Obama for the CURRENT crappy economic situation. NEWSFLASH! He is not the President, yet, and it did not start on his watch. Ms Mia, you represent the exact reason why it won't be better. You apply political preference to my answer. Where or how did you interpret attack on the PE, or even his party? You may not like the fact that I point to facts, but that's a common problem I have with people who seek feel good answers, while putting their head in the sand. Also common, as in your response, there is only attempted distraction and attempt at insult, not a contrary substantiated by evidence position. Because the PE takes office things will be better? How's that going to happen when he himself says it wont? I'm not blaming PE Obama, I'm agreeing with him and have taken the necessary steps to insulate myself from the results that I believe his entitlement and social engineering programs will create. See a different result, with factual supporting evidence, and I'll be happy to consider it. Because "I think so" doesn't qualify. What I won't say its "You people...". Your perspective provides a no lose commentary. "It's the fault of the prior administration." or "The President, when he takes on the office, hasn't had enough time." Me - I'm only agreeing with the PE. You want to argue with him - feel free. One of the primary reasons I agree with him is that the general status quo, the last 8 years as you refer to them, hasn't changed. The cabinet appointments of the PE indicate that his obligations to special interests are no different than his predecessor. The Congress, who authorized spending for things like the Iraq war, who ran the auditing and over-site is principally the same as it was for the past 8 years, with the same party in the majority for the past two. Which is more likely, change or 'business as usual' under those circumstances? I'm sorry you are conned into believing theres is a difference coming. I particularly enjoy the "People like me" reference because it confirms I'd not a person like you taken in by the con. I'd much rather be a person who looks at it in strictly pragmatic cause/effect terms without prejudice. That may not be appreciated by you, but it may be by others who aren't conned by rhetoric and instead measure value by results and facts.
< Message edited by Mercnbeth -- 12/20/2008 9:56:14 AM >
|