Wolfie648
Posts: 600
Joined: 9/14/2005 Status: offline
|
This is a general reply: Ther is a lot of talk of topping from the bottom, bottoming from the top etc etc. This is why I define my relationships in terms of power. When it comes to the government I can rebel all I want - but I had better pay my taxes unless I am prepared to pay the consequences, when it comes to my work relationships - I had better make sure that I do what my boss(es) tell me - even if I disagree, even if I attempted to offer a suggestion (I'm not a slave after all I'm an employee per described situation - I have few but some rights) (I won't get into inter personal work relationship dynamics), when it comes to personal relationships then the power is all mine - the power to accept someone as an equal or not, a friend or not, the power to say farewell, the power to say yes or no. Personally I don't like the terms 'top' 'bottom' 'submissive' 'master' When it comes to my BDSM relationships, as I see it: When it comes to submissives (in terms of what I hope is generally accepted within the BDSM community;regardless of whether they define themselves as top or bottom), they have the power to control the situation. They have the power to say no, stop, not so hard, etc. The power to invoke a contract. Power. Tastes good doesn't it? ;-) When it comes to slaves they do not have the power. They can't say no, stop, not so hard, etc. Who has the power? That's the 'top' in the situation at hand. As I see it. 'service tops' yep they are out there doing a good service to the 'dom bottoms' I don't have a problem with that; define yourself as what you will - I just think it is easier to understand through a perspective of 'power'. <puts on the asbestos suit> D (owner of j).
_____________________________
Possibly.
|