Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

disproportionate, much?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> disproportionate, much? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 3:37:36 PM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
http://www.thestar.com/World/Columnist/article/559104

at the risk of breaking the seasonal spirit with fierce debate over the same ground again, but it shouldnt be ignored; after all it might be now so that it just might be ignored

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 3:47:30 PM   
ArticMaestro


Posts: 178
Joined: 12/8/2008
Status: offline
But Hamas insists that war like this is it's "right".   They do get to make thier own choices.  Hamas decided to end the Cease Fire, and make war.  Isreal is targeting Hamas structures, and hitting a few civilians in the cross fire.  Hamas is targeting Isreali civilians. 

Why on earth would anyone want the death toll to be the same on both sides?

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 3:52:49 PM   
piratecommander


Posts: 895
Joined: 8/20/2008
Status: offline
It can't surely be ignored this time ?

The "civilised" world should hang it's head in shame.

Israel clearly has "special" friends turning blind eyes to its racist/religious persecution.

I don't see how these "Merchant Bankers" are still in business

Pirate

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 3:55:18 PM   
piratecommander


Posts: 895
Joined: 8/20/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ArticMaestro

But Hamas insists that war like this is it's "right".   They do get to make thier own choices.  Hamas decided to end the Cease Fire, and make war.  Isreal is targeting Hamas structures, and hitting a few civilians in the cross fire.  Hamas is targeting Isreali civilians. 

Why on earth would anyone want the death toll to be the same on both sides?


Body count so far ?

Pirate

(in reply to ArticMaestro)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 3:57:09 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
The current situation appears to be headed to full warfare both in the air and on the ground.  And the casualties will continue to climb while humanitarian aid and medical supplies are behind the blockades.  I doubt that a cease fire is going to be renegotiated anytime in the near future.  It is a very grim and terrible situation.  

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 3:58:11 PM   
piratecommander


Posts: 895
Joined: 8/20/2008
Status: offline
Who's blockades ?

Pirate

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 4:10:28 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
Page last updated at 08:46 GMT, Thursday, 27 November 2008

"More aid reaches blockaded Gaza"

"Israel has permitted limited aid and fuel deliveries into the Gaza Strip, which it has closed to virtually all supplies for the past three weeks.

Also on Wednesday, Gaza's only power plant, which is in urgent need of spare parts, restarted at reduced capacity.

Shortages and power cuts in the territory have led the UN to describe conditions there as the "worst ever".

Israel says the tightening of the Gaza blockade is a legitimate response to rocket fire by Palestinian militants."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7750417.stm

< Message edited by Vendaval -- 12/29/2008 4:12:05 PM >


_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to piratecommander)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 4:24:25 PM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
E,
You are truly a brave person. My regards to you. I hope you had a wonderful Holiday!

"Disproportionate" is a matter of time. Regardless of the number of mortars coming from Gaza into Israel; tens, hundreds, thousands; there is only one proportionality in the region - one sides hatred of the other. It is a given that personal exceptions exist. I'm confident that there are some Romeo & Juliet stories to be told, but in the majority the hatred goes back as long as humans have been recording history.

The current situation is a response. Granted its a response equal to a person being snipped at and not mortally wounded by a broken toothed dog for years and waking up one day deciding to kick it in the head with a steel pointed boot. "Disproportionate" depends if one time your baby was bit and scared. Regardless, at minimum, some culpability must be assigned to the dog.

What would be "proportionate"? Would it be for Israel to keep tabs and kill or maim a number equal to the number of Israelis killed and maimed from mortar shell attacks over the years from Gaza? Maybe the killing of a proportional number of  ancestors of those who set up the state of Israel in 1947? How about a proportional number of the ancestors from Arab States, namely Egypt, who help create 'Palestinians' by advising the indigenous people, more interested in survival than religion back then, to get out of the way while they went to war to wipe Israel off the map?

I can't believe that you would support proportional killing any more than you don't support what you and the UN consider disproportionate. The word implies justification.

All that said, I find the timing interesting. There are all kinds of possible 'conspiracy theories' to be suggested. The price of crude oil showed their biggest gain in months. Can it be that the 'military industrial complex' wants to make sure they have an active market in the region? Does Israel want to get the long awaited 'final' battle started with its neighbors before there is a change in the US Administration which may not be so ready to play the 'Israel is an ally' card and provide unilateral support?

I've always said the US should not be there under any circumstances. It is improbable that 5000 years of killing and maiming can be resolved diplomatically and democratically. Perhaps a iron fisted dictator can control the 'peace' but we've killed Saddam and not enough people take President Ahmadinejad seriously both within and from outside the Arab/Muslim/Islamic (Pick a label you prefer since semantics seems to be a favored distraction tactic for some) world. Maybe that will change if after we leave Iraq he is called upon to 'free' the minority population whose tribal affiliation he shares by annexing all or parts of Iraq.

The current situation is just the beginning. Perhaps, for a time the flames will be suppressed and won't develop into a wildfire, but they will eventually. Too many factors, oil, population, environment, and the economy; point to a global need of shuffling the deck once again to see who will come out on top. I don't have much hope, or see an outcome possible where what we now call the 'west' will prevail. Hell, its been a good run but in many respects the 'west' is already conquered and dead.

The question is, who will it be? The Chinese are positioned well, but I'm afraid their pulling back the curtain a bit may be their downfall. Their citizenry envies what they see in the world and will put pressure on their government to provide more of the creature comforts and basic freedoms. They also have too much 'invested' in the West.

Russia is too disjointed to be a factor. They have the resource - oil, but they don't have the infrastructure. They also have too many selfish capitalists in position of authority who will cash out before making themselves vulnerable. 

I think it will be the Muslim world. It deserves consideration and has earned its potential position of power. Their repression of dissenting opinion and the way they are set up so that their absolute authority must be followed by its members mirrors the Dark Ages practices of the Catholic church and look what they accomplished. As their numbers increase and their actions rationalized by enablers they will be positioned to accomplish most of the leadership's stated global objectives. They've earned the chance.

Opinion and speculation of course. I'm sure some will see some, but there is no blame or agenda being represented. Don't forget there are always 'wild cards' that come into play. And there is, after all, a big change coming to Washington in a few weeks.

Hope everyone enjoyed and had a great Holiday season - It is my opinion that the ride could be rough from this point forward.

< Message edited by Mercnbeth -- 12/29/2008 5:17:22 PM >

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 4:56:52 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
I wish we would just turn our attention away from the Middle East and let someone win...big...get it over with. If we had done that 30 years ago there would have been a lot less death and destruction…SOMEONE has to win now… there is too much hate for a negotiated settlement.

LadyEllen…if I am reading you wrong I apologize…but imagine rockets were falling on Stourport. Killing and maiming your friends and family, would you think negotiations would be appropriate?

Time after time Hamas has purposely restarted the war. Especially when a peace settlement seems possible.

I just don’t understand why the world is not protesting Hamas breaking an agreement rather than an understandable and necessary response from the victims.

Heavy handed my ass… they have no choice… Hamas purposely hides behind and within civilian areas… further proof of their disregard of their people’s lives…hoping when Israel retaliates the outrage of civilian deaths will help in their war against Zionism.

Butchers plain and simple…they need to be exterminated like the vermin they are.

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 12/29/2008 4:58:40 PM >

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 4:58:29 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
I share the same opinion, Merc.  Remember in this part of the world, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend".


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
Hope everyone enjoyed and had a great Holiday season - It is my opinion that the ride could be rough from this point forward.


_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 5:09:41 PM   
MzMia


Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
I started to start a post on the situation in the Middle East/Israeli-
Palestinian conflict, but I did not know where to even start.
 
Fact is, they have been fighting over that land since apparently B.C.
and certainly A.D.
The Arab-Israeli Conflict
I don't think they will ever stop fighting.

My question is, "How much should the USA be involved?"

 
Merc, the holiday season is not over.
We still have 6 more days, including New Year's Eve and
New Year's Day.
 
The party is really just starting.



< Message edited by MzMia -- 12/29/2008 5:21:02 PM >


_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain


What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 6:28:29 PM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
I must admit, I think it's only a matter of time before the nuclear firecrackers get pulled out of the basement and dropped on some cities.  I wouldn't be surprised if Israel lobs the first one, they don't have enough land to absorb much punishment and still be a viable country (it's only about the size of New Jersey.)

I think what's interesting is the NYT doesn't have the comment that Hamas's threat to resume lobbing rockets was in response to an Israeli blockade which was in the Toronto Sun (or I missed it in the NYT.)  Shades of WWII when Japan attacked the US for the same reason.

I'm not surprised by the Israeli response though.  Lady E, I'm Jewish (not practicing) and I can fill you in on a little of the emotion that starts to build at this point-

The history of Jewish persecution is based on Jews being seen as less than human in the eyes of their tormentors.  Often uncited are the religious beliefs on the Jews part that cause them to be singled out- such as non-Jewish women are unclean and shouldn't be touched by Jewish men.  Dealing with somebody keeping Kosher is guaranteed to raise the hackles of any reasonable non-Jewish host, so there's clearly a lot of provocation through the ages.  Perhaps not surprising, it becomes acceptable to view Jews as less than human.  A lot of Jewish literature shows how steeped this idea is in the culture.  Example (I'm paraphrasing, but you'll get the idea.)  The Cossacks rode into town today.  They had not done well on the battlefield, so they kill a few Jews to show how unhappy they are.  Jewish humor is full of these references where Jews are seen as less than human.

The Israelis are on a hair trigger, because the Muslims/Arabs/towelheads language often implies such a dichotomy between Jews and humans.  Let's face it, Hamas sworn goal is to wipe Israel off the map, the Iranian pres has said the same thing and these are popular elected or representative groups.  Hence, the Israelis tend to feel that they haven't got many friends in the Muslim/Arab world, although there have been a number of successful business and academic collaborations. On a personal level, relationships can work.

Your call that Israel's reaction is not proportionate I suspect would rate a chuckle from an Israeli, given England's role in setting up the current situation. 

A little history may help explain things.  The Jews who founded Israel were not fond of the English, since England was closed to large numbers of the Jewish refugees.  Well, truth be told, England was broke and lots of people were starving in postwar Europe.  It took awhile for the Marshall plan to catch hold in this country and during that time, Europe wasn't doing so hot.  Lots of people starved to death in the Netherlands in the winter of 1945, and there were lots of deaths from disease which should be laid at the door of malnutrition.  Nor should one forget the Swiss who refused to allow the heirs of the Jews who'd gone up in smoke in Nazi ovens to collect on their bank accounts.  Had they released that money, Europe, Israel, and the Arab world would probably look very different today.  The end result was that postwar this bunch of refugees (Jews) were penniless, starving, and dispossessed of their homes and businesses since the lawyers of the victors decided that judgements in Nazi courts were valid.  Either way it was a nightmare- there wasn't enough housing in Europe- somebody was going to be out in the cold.  Most of the European Jews that survived would have preferred to stay in Europe, but were forced to emigrate.  A bunch went to the US and a bunch went to Palestine while there were still people in dp camps as late as 1948. 

The massive influx of Jewish refugees into Palestine upset the applecart that had been relatively peaceful before between the Jews in Palestine and the Arabs in surrounding lands.  One of the dirty little secrets was that the military arms in the region were left in Arab hands by the English while the Israelis scrounged whatever they could beg, borrow or steal. Given the tight ties between England and the Arabs (T.E. Lawrence- I've never quite understood this.) the hand off wasn't surprising, but the outcome of the '48 war certainly was.  Everybody expected the Arabs to finish the job the Nazis started- it's just that these survivors were smarter (natural selection- all the dumb ones went up in smoke) and incredibly motivated.  Some of this history is a little personal for me- my grandpop was part of a group that hijacked a Liberty ship out of Baltimore harbor to run guns to the Jews in Israel.

So basically the situation in Israel is as follows- the towelheads want to kill all the Jews, and the Jews are tired of listening to anybody that suggests that they turn the other cheek.  The Jewish experience has been that if you allow them to start killing Jews, it just continues.  But I wouldn't be surprised if Teheran gets nuked before Tel Aviv- nobody's going to tell these guys to take the first punch.

Sam


< Message edited by samboct -- 12/29/2008 6:33:57 PM >

(in reply to MzMia)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 6:30:27 PM   
ArticMaestro


Posts: 178
Joined: 12/8/2008
Status: offline
 Hamas's chickens are coming home to roost.  

The people support Hamas, and its tactic of using civilians as shields to launch attacks on Isreali civilians. 

The idea that they can keep a constant barage of missles firing at thier neighbors with no consequence is insane.

(in reply to MzMia)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 6:50:56 PM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
"It is improbable that 5000 years of killing and maiming can be resolved diplomatically and democratically."

Umm, not really true.  The history of Jews in the Middle East certainly is steeped in blood if you go back far enough, but if we'd be looking at things since say 1800 or so, the Jewish communities were largely integrated into the region.  Baghdad used to have a sizeable Jewish community, and I think Damascus did as well.  (Measured in the tens of thousands and reasonably integrated.)  Even in the 1900s with the increase in popularity of the Zionist movement- most Jews didn't want to go to Palestine.  It was hard living and agricultural for the most part.  (Jews tend to be city dwellers- certainly in Europe and the US.) It was also pretty tough to tell the difference between an Arab and a Jewish farm.   The tipping point was the massive influx of refugees postwar, because an agrarian economy wasn't going to support the population that was arriving.  The massive infrastructure building spree dispossessed the Arabs who up until that time, had peacefully coexisted with the Jews and that's when the trouble began.  Also, the Jews began getting a lot of financial aid from the US, and I suspect that there was a lot of envy of that as well.  Thus, the Arabs view the existence of the state of Israel when the problems began- get rid of Israel, and things would go back to the way that they were.

Sam

Forgot-another sore point amongst the Arabs is that they're second class citizens in Israel- no voting rights (or they're limited).  One of the reasons why South Africa was the first country to recognize Israel, fellow apartheid countries.  The Israelis are far from blameless in this conflict.

< Message edited by samboct -- 12/29/2008 7:10:42 PM >

(in reply to ArticMaestro)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 6:51:52 PM   
MzMia


Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
Sam, since many people always compare Israel's size to New Jersey, I came
up with this idea about 20 years ago.
 
Why not just give Israel, New Jersey?
Not many people would even miss that state and I bet they could really help

improve our nation's economy.
 
If it will prevent a nuclear war, let's just take a vote on giving them New Jersey.

_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain


What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 6:55:45 PM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
Hi Mia

I think that's a fine idea- but what do you do when the rest of the country doesn't want the people from New Jersey either?

Sam

(in reply to MzMia)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 6:58:14 PM   
MzMia


Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct

Hi Mia

I think that's a fine idea- but what do you do when the rest of the country doesn't want the people from New Jersey either?

Sam


Hummmmmmm,
Great question Sam!
Happy New Year!


_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain


What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 7:04:53 PM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
If they were the least bit rational, they'd figure out that lobbing missiles at the Jewish folk is counterproductive, no matter how much the "International Community" (European anti-Jew racist fucks) whine and bitch and propagandize for Hamas.

Think this is why IDF bombed the Uni?
"IAF aircraft bombed the Islamic University and government compound in Gaza City early Monday morning, both centers of Hamas power. Witnesses saw fire and smoke at the university, counting six separate air strikes there just after midnight.

Two laboratories in the university, which served as research and development centers for Hamas's military wing, were targeted. The development of explosives was done under the auspices of university professors.
University buildings were also used for meetings of senior Hamas officials.
The IDF said rockets and explosives were stored in the buildings."
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1230111723191&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Do you think Hamas has a responsibility to not hide military assets among civilians? The Geneva Convention thinks so:
"Art. 28. The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations."

Art. 29. The Party to the conflict in whose hands protected persons may be, is responsible for the treatment accorded to them by its agents, irrespective of any individual responsibility which may be incurred."

Here's a quote from a poster on another board:
Just a couple of talk out of my ass observations: One of the stupidest arguments I've heard about this thing was some fucks trying to minimize the rockets landing in Israel with a "Well, nobody got hurt up until recently." What kind of silly ass thinking is that? "Well, if somebody's shooting at me it doesn't really count until I'm hit?"
I consider it a common mistake to try and put other peoples on our scales. They are on their own set of scales. Hiding weapons in schools, mosques, etc... using the "challenged" as bombers or hiding behind woman and children? No problem. Then whine to the heavens when these places get hit and civilians get hurt. What kind of total bullshit is that?
Dear Hamas and other assorted fuck weasels,
Stop putting your arms etc.. in and around public places, you cowardly pieces of shit.

And I'm with those that think Hamas/the Palestinians might want to rethink their tactics. AND the total fucking hypocrisy exhibited by the Arab world and others, as mentioned in this thread, is mind-numbing.
Proportionality? What a fucking joke. If somebody keeps stomping on your foot you don't simply stomp on their foot in return. After about the 5th time you stomp their guts out."  Maxurlife



_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 7:12:48 PM   
servantheart


Posts: 960
Joined: 10/26/2006
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

Dear Hamas and other assorted fuck weasels,
Stop putting your arms etc.. in and around public places, you cowardly pieces of shit. 







_____________________________

When you really trust someone, you have to be okay with not understanding some things.
~Real Live Preacher, Real Live Preacher weblog, 07-08-04; Anonymous author of RealLivePreacher.com

(in reply to Hippiekinkster)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: disproportionate, much? - 12/29/2008 7:20:11 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
      Here's a little dedication the inhabitants of Gaza.  I don't care anymore

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> disproportionate, much? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.113