agirl
Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: marie2 quote:
ORIGINAL: agirl I disagree marie. Thinking about, and revisiting situations that were unpleasant seems to be the only way to apply how you think and feel NOW. It gives you the chance to re-assess what you *thought and felt at the time* and look at ways you'd do things differently. Your idea of re-living something possibly is other's idea of thinking it through and gaining a different perspective on it. What is the process of healing in your view? agirl If I've lived through something painful, I've already learned all I'm going to learn while I was going through the experience. I don't believe healing is a process unless you make it such. I dont think I have to recount something to compare it to how I feel now. Talking about things does in fact conjur up old feelings. At least it does for me. If I re-count a story about something funny my kid did when she 2, I'll find myself smiling and feeling joyful. If I talk about my father's death, I'll find myself feeling sorrowful and crying. These are examples given only to support the fact that when we talk about things that were emotional experiences, we tend to feel those emotions all over again, at least to SOME extent. In some cases that even comforts a person because it's familiar; it reminds them of what they know, instead of the more scary option which is to become something new. As far as past "abuses", I would have to disagree that talking about things necessarily has to be part of someone's healing. I really don't believe it does. I don't need to compare it to who I am today. I believe when we focus on the past we bring the past into our present. That to me, isn't healing. Healing is when it no longer has to be a part of your thinking process, healing is when it no longer defines who you are and what you're about. Sure, our experiences matter, but I don't believe we need to carry them with us for the rest of our lives as some kind of ingredients to the "recipe" of who we are. I believe that people often hold onto shit because it makes them feel safer and more secure..."its part of who I am, afterall, it's what makes me me". Maybe they'll lose their identity as they know it if they let shit go. I don't know. Doesn't work for me. I'm healed from things because I choose for unpleasantries to no longer be necessary to my make-up. It's a choice like anything else in life. Do I want to live in pain? Or do I want to let go of shit that used to cause me pain? If you got clunked on the head and woke up with amnesia, who would you be? How would you create yourself? I don't believe we have to be the sum of our ALL of our experiences, I believe we can choose to eliminate unpleasant thoughts from the past, and you don't eliminate by conjuring it all up over and over again. This is where people differ. While I'm not emotionally dented to a great degree by *stuff* in my past.........it's been hugely beneficial to chat about it. Not least because I got to hear how things were for my Mum. I got a far greater understanding of her as a person and her motivations and drives at the time. It altered how I viewed things massively and also made me think about the impression I might be having on my sprogs. The benefits have been great and we've become incredibly close through the years that we've had a look at these things. I don't tend to feel the same emotions at all when I talk about past unhappiness, more a curiousity but nothing that would inhibit me doing so. It's been quite useful in some cases to get some clarity and insight from the other person, instead of only having my own. I don't want to be THAT healed, to be honest. My past IS influencing my present and my good decisions are made up out of it. I AM defined by the entire sum of my life......the good and the not so good......I am in no hurry to be rid of it. agirl
|