corysub -> RE: Russian professor predicted 2010 demise of US (1/1/2009 7:14:32 PM)
|
I think if the good professor would have kept his theory more on a possible change in "form of government" in the United States his thesis would seem more within the realm of possibility. It's kinda silly, and probably based on his experience with the disintergration of the Soviet Union, to believe that China would control the Western USA; "Mexico", a corrupt country that can't even control it's own people would control the southwest, and "Canada"..part of the northern tier .. eh! He also did not factor in Sarah Palin being Governor of Alaska and would shoot the balls off the first Russian troops that waded ashore. Seriously, the USA faced disintergration over slavery and found the leadership in Lincoln who, while hated by most of the north for the first few years, finally found Grant and saved the union. Today, he is on a pedestal as one of, if not the greatest, Presidents in our history. During the 1930's the communist party made terrific inroads in the USA and was essentially a vassel of the Stalin regime. At that time we saw unemployment range close to 20% for most of the first two terms of FDR after peaking closer to 25%! Today we are close to 7% and worst case seems to be 10% in 2009 prior to the economy showing a recovery, and in the 1930's, unemployment was a lot more severe for the family than these days. While Obama and a super liberal Congress could test the willingness of the American people to turn over increased control of and how we live our lives to government, in 2010 we will have an important mid-term election that conceivably could see the loss of control by the liberal wing of the party, if not the democrat party in general. People, rightfully, don't trust the government to do much right and Obama's leadership has yet to be proven. But disintergration of the USA and our free capitalist system does not seem in the cards to me. If it does happen, I won't be around to see it and neither will a few people in my line of fire.
|
|
|
|