iansilver
Posts: 1
Joined: 10/17/2004 Status: offline
|
For almost any fetish or desire expressed on this site, I'm sure you can find a lot of people in the vanilla world who regard it as insane. Chaining someone in a basement for an extended period is one of the more extreme concepts described here (for real, rather than fantasy, that is), but I firmly believe that for a small subset of the BDSM community it is not insane at all, provided that: - issues of physical health and safety (exercise, fire/flood, etc.) are adequately addressed
- both the captor and captive have spent a sufficient time, examining their motives and capacity to endure this, to be sure that both can handle it
Having said that, I would emphasize that: - there is more physical and mental danger here than in many other edge activities, so making sure of the two points above would take a great deal of thought, planning (at least on the part of the captor), and communication prior to the captivity
- the words "small subset" are key; I believe that the number of people for whom this would really work over the long term, and not be unhealthy, is very small
- as with other edge activities, if you've only fantasized about it, start small and increase intensity (duration of captivity, restriction of movement, isolation, etc.) gradually
- during the captivity, it is impossible to overestimate the importance of the captor staying aware that his captive's life depends on him
I have been keenly interested for many years in keeping girls in genuine captivity for extended periods. I have only been able to do this a few times, both because it's hard to find people for whom it's truly appropriate, and because it is difficult to do with what I consider to be adequate safety. The longest I've kept a girl locked in chains continuously was about four months, but for most of this period she was chained in a way that would allow her to leave the house in the event of fire. (It was the certain humiliation of her nakedness and shackles that kept her from leaving.) The longest I've kept a captive physically unable to escape is about two weeks; I did this several times with a slave I owned for twelve years. During that time, I desperately wanted to extend the captivity to much longer periods, but I was never able to devote enough time to being able to do so safely. Two weeks was the longest I could go without having to be out of the house for more than a couple of hours. Even for absences of two hours or less, I focused on safety. I never left the house at all during the part of the year where a furnace malfunction or power failure would have been a threat. I ran a piece of flexible conduit outdoors from the cell where my captive was chained, so that she would have fresh air to breathe if the house began to fill with smoke. And, although I didn't have anyone at that time whom I could depend on to share responsibility for daily care, I made sure that at least one other person was aware of the situation so that my captive could be released if something happened to me. I don't claim that I established perfect safety, but I think I made the physical danger no greater than it would be for someone who is ill or otherwise restricted from movement, or who has taken a strong sleeping pill before retiring. I'm absolutely sure, from talking to my captives at length after their release, that they felt their experience was something they wanted and needed. These were people with a deep, enduring desire to experience utter helplessness and powerlessness, to be in a state of captivity as real and rigorous as possible, for more than a day or two. Although I do admit to one of them developing something of an addiction to captivity (to the point of showing up at my door without prior arrangement and wanting to be held prisoner again), that is the only aspect of these experinces that I regarded as unhealthy for either captor or captive. I may not be qualified to make an absolute determination of whether having these desires in the first place - captor or captive - is insane. There are a lot of people who are quite insane and regard themselves as perfectly sane, so perhaps I am one. But I do feel that, with the precautions and qualifications I've described, it's no more insane to act on an unusual desire than it is to have one, as long as no one is harmed. And I think there are only two kinds of people who can know whether an individual has been harmed mentally - the individual themself, or a mental health professional.
|