RE: A very interesting Profile

RE: A very interesting Profile (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

Lockit -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 7:14:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mistresstammy69 HE MUST LOST IS REAL DICK TO THE GIRL WITH THE ITCH LOL ROFL.. omg!

DrkJourney -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 7:14:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mistresstammy69 HE MUST LOST IS REAL DICK TO THE GIRL WITH THE ITCH LOL ewwwwwwwwwwww.....lol

Venatrix -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 7:17:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer that reminds me of the old saying "close your eyes and think of England". mmmm England... in tight jeans.... _____________________________ Wait! Are those my pants? They're mine, but Venatrix has been borrowing them, so they're no longer tight on me, I'm afraid. [;)] Yes, I hear you've been having trouble getting anyone into your pants. By the way, isn't it past your bed time?

Lockit -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 7:18:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit quote: ORIGINAL: mistresstammy69 HE MUST LOST IS REAL DICK TO THE GIRL WITH THE ITCH LOL ROFL.. omg! Now that gives new meaning to cbt!

PeonForHer -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 7:29:41 PM)
So only fake men cater to women? So I should be dating a drag king? I mean, that would be hot and all, but... well... Sigh. Confused Hib Nah. Only fake men have a go at those men who are subs for being fake men.

PeonForHer -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 7:30:42 PM)
By the way, isn't it past your bed time? Indeed. Nighty-night . . . .

OneMoreWaste -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 7:36:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Venatrix Real men have male genitalia. That's pretty much my only criterion. You don't even need a pulse? [:-] Damn, and to think I get accused of having low standards! Anyway, submissive men are only good for "no strings attached" housework, so that the woman can pawn it off on them and spend more quality time with her Dominant/vanilla husband. Everyone knows that!

LadyHibiscus -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 7:36:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer So only fake men cater to women? So I should be dating a drag king? I mean, that would be hot and all, but... well... Sigh. Confused Hib Nah. Only fake men have a go at those men who are subs for being fake men. Thanks, that cleared EVERYTHING up! [8\|]

Venatrix -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 7:40:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OneMoreWaste quote: ORIGINAL: Venatrix Real men have male genitalia. That's pretty much my only criterion. You don't even need a pulse? [:-] Damn, and to think I get accused of having low standards! Yes, well, I've been on CM for over a year. My standards have dropped considerably.

PeonForHer -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 7:41:48 PM)
Doh! I'm supposed to be in bed. Venatrix keeps telling me to come - er, sorry - go to bed. I mean only men who are fakes themselves go on about what a "real man should be". Is my view.

OneMoreWaste -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 7:56:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Venatrix Yes, well, I've been on CM for over a year. My standards have dropped considerably. Sweeeeeeeeeet [:)]

hereyesruponyou -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 8:35:20 PM)
Ok come here, bend over and let me feel around....i'll let you know if you are real or not...i promise...no really...come on...

Wickad -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/19/2009 8:44:23 PM)
(fast reply) Greetings, Strangely enough I believe that all men cater to the women they love. If a submissive woman didn't want to be controlled, spanked, humiliated, etc then I'm sure the men who they were with wouldn't do those things to them - lol. Wickad

Dnomyar -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/20/2009 7:42:10 AM)
Good grief. Now I have to adhere to standards.

littlesarbonn -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/20/2009 7:45:05 AM)
I was once courted by a dominant woman who really said all the right things, and then one day during this dating stage, she made a very similar statement, saying that she took both slaves and lovers (as different people) because she didn't consider slaves "real men". We stopped dating that day.

FullfigRIMAAM1 -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/20/2009 7:51:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: littlesarbonn saying that she took both slaves and lovers (as different people) because she didn't consider slaves "real men". We stopped dating that day. Good for you, but I have to tell you, I've heard this sentiment expressed a few times from male submissives or slaves... I don't know where they get it from, but I guess it's each person's kink/mindset that matters. Needless to say, that disqualified the men who uttered those words, given that I have never, up to this point, considered doing the poly thing. M

Petruchio -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/20/2009 8:03:21 AM)
There may be another consideration. I've found it's not unusual that (some) dommes feel the need to connect with a dominant male. A male dom may have hard limits (express or implied) that leave her unsatisfied and seeking someone to satisfy her remaining desires. In thinking about the use of the term boy (and boi), it may be she perceives male subbing as more boyish– not less masculine… just … boyish.

PeonForHer -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/20/2009 8:55:40 AM)
I was once courted by a dominant woman who really said all the right things, and then one day during this dating stage, she made a very similar statement, saying that she took both slaves and lovers (as different people) because she didn't consider slaves "real men". We stopped dating that day. God, women like that do a disservice to dominas everywhere. How repugnant.

MistressFaye1 -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/20/2009 9:00:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit Will all the men stand in line please... we are going to hold 'real men' checks... I volunteer to be an inspector!!!!!!! lol

PeonForHer -> RE: A very interesting Profile (1/20/2009 9:02:21 AM)
In thinking about the use of the term boy (and boi), it may be she perceives male subbing as more boyish– not less masculine… just … boyish. Hmm. "Boyish" might not mean the same as "less masculine", but it does sail dangerously close to it. One reason why I'd guard my right to "give away my boyishness [yuk word!]" to the degree that I want, to the women of my choice, and only to those women.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875