StrangerThan
Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jeptha quote:
ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist ...In the first 3 seconds I meet someone, I know that if we all crashed in the jungle, they would either be a follower, a leader or a casualty (food for the wild beasts). I think that there are more co-operative models, aside from the "lead/follow/get out of the way" options, and some of those may actually be desirable because they better use the strengths of all the people. Otherwise, you can easily have splitting into factions. And, a house too much divided cannot stand, etc. But then; I generally don't believe that we are divided into "leaders" and "followers". I don't think it's quite that simple. I'm not denigrating leadership ~ leadership is good, but it sometimes means deligating, and that means being able to deligate authority, when called for, as well. "Confidence" was mentioned later in the thread as a key element, but confidence doesn't impress me at all. There has to be some quality to the ideas, and sound judgement, compassion, and probably a bunch of other things mixed in as well. Think of a political figure you dislike. Surely they exuded confidence that they were right, their ideas were faultless, etc. Anybody with a closed mind is going to be confident within their own small arena. Confidence alone can drive you right off the cliff. One also has to know when to follow. See... leadership for the sake of leadership isn't what defines power to me. The need to control everything or everyone isn't what defines it - for me. Honestly, I see both of those as more of a character flaw than a demonstration of or even a exuding of power. When I read this question intially, my mind immediately went to a man I served under while in the military. His style was laid back, laconic, with a good bit of what he wanted you to accomplish delivered in the form of a question backed by a wry smile. He wasn't an officer and wasn't even that high on the totem pole, and yet he garnered more natural respect than anyone else I met the entire 8 years I served. Natural respect vs official respect - bita's differentation between the Office in the Man and the Man in the Office. I can honestly say I sweated more under situations where official respect was due since I wasn't exactly a candidate for a good conduct medal, but I in terms of actual remorse, the natural won every time over the official. The man in question wasn't that great of a physical specimen, was close to retirement, and often would leave you with some anecdote to ponder whether the issue you were chewing on was professional or personal in nature... just not the vision many would conjure when it came to crafting a portrait of a person who could command that type of respect with so little effort. And it wasn't just me, it was the entire division. What we acheived under him was nothing short of momentous in respect to the things acheived under other leaders. It wasn't that no one followed orders under the others. The difference was.... what I think power is all about. The inspiration to acheive didn't come from proclamations or scowling figureheads. It came because he expected it of you... and you knew it. At times when we were in our element - which varies often when you're in the military depending on what job you have at a given time, he was more than willing to step aside and follow. He may have been our leader, but had we ended up on one of those deserted islands, I expect he'd have followed at least until those of us trained to survive in that environment created a place we could have survived. I think mental, physical, emotional things can all affect what power is and how it comes across. Defining it as a specific set of skills, specific projection from someone is also relative in a sense. A leader who will lead down a path I know is wrong or has to have his way just to have it, isn't one I'm willing to step aside for... and no matter how Domly you are, unless you are the President, you're going to do some stepping out of the way in life. We all have something we submit to, whether it be laws that define what we can do, what we can't, and how we interact or just the fact that there's only one President and we're not him. If I ended up on a deserted island with several other people. I wouldn't be the one trying to set up order and declare myself leader. What I do see is that if someone else has to do that in order to fit some personality quirk, then he or she better damned well do it well, else I'm going to eat well, sleep well and stay dry whether that person does or not.. because I can and I know I can. Again, I'm not doing it justice. I think some of it is relative to the beholder. But out of all the people I've known in life there are only two I'd be willing to follow anywhere. One is an uncle, the other is the man noted above. Both have the same style. Gotta go.
< Message edited by StrangerThan -- 1/25/2009 2:09:49 PM >
|