RE: Dutch politician on trial for offensive movie (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


NorthernGent -> RE: Dutch politician on trial for offensive movie (1/30/2009 3:12:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Although I'm ashamed to admit this, I'm beyond flattered that my identity caused you to agonise [8D] . 



You shouldn't be ashamed of two needy humans stalking one another 'round a message board. Would you like an ice cream and a ride on my donkey?




MichiganHeadmast -> RE: Dutch politician on trial for offensive movie (1/30/2009 3:31:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

As a recovered catholic I'm not in favor of any religion.
I'd outlaw all of them!


It's been tried, Popeye.  It gets messy.  People tend to say "fuck you," and they pray and go to church anyway.  Then you gotta kill them, and sometimes they kill you back, and, well, all I'll say is North Korea has come the closest to purging all religion.  But then Chia Pet Sr. just replaced it with his own fucktarded Juche crap.




StrangerThan -> RE: Dutch politician on trial for offensive movie (1/30/2009 4:26:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: colouredin

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

There is a basic problem with the Muslim culture today… they have trouble separating religion from government. They do not desire to live with another culture… they feel it is their religious duty to convert it or replace it.

Butch


Im pretty sure that many Muslims would find that offensive


The only part of his statement one might find offensive is whether or not they desire to live with another culture.

In countries where Muslims have a majority of the population about half the states involved either consider themselves Islamic states or have Islam as an official state religion.  In a decent portion of the rest are separatist movements. A 50/50 mix isn't conjecture when it comes to saying Muslims have difficulty separating state from government.

In one of those countries where it's listed as a state religion, myself and 2 others spent about 30 minutes plastered to the side of one of those dusty mud brick buildings with semi-automatic weapons held to our heads for no reason other than the fact that we were American. This was before the disaster we call Bush and before his father. After telling us all the reasons we didn't deserve to live, they, for some reason, decided not to shoot us there in the middle of town. They did however, relieve us of all the money we were carrying. You might conjure images of Al Queda type people, but Al Queda, if I'm thinking right didn't come along until the 90's. This was before that and this group was comprised of a taxi driver, 2 policemen, and a few others who happened to be standing by. Aside from religion, we were "offended" in many ways, everything from culture to our women to our mothers and fathers. Pick something. I doubt they left much out. Of course from a police perspective, it's easier to explain things to the American diplomat if we were resisting or aggressive.

I'm pretty sure I found the whole thing pretty fucking offensive. This debate is like abortion. Everyone chooses an example that no one wants to attack, then defends every damned piece of ground in between from that position. The fact is some are extremists, some aren't. Some hate western culture. Some do not. Some live in different cultures without issue, some do not.

I don't hate the religion. I don't hate the people who practice it. A week after being held at gunpoint, I was safe gaurding other Muslims. Good people are good people. The freaks, the wanna-destroy-infidels, the ones who preach hatred, live hatred, just can't damned well stand the fact that when I look at the Koran I see a book and nothing else and need to riot over it, far as I'm concerned, Pershing had the best way of dealing with them.

And if that offends someone... too damned bad. Let them be offended.




MissSepphora1 -> RE: Dutch politician on trial for offensive movie (1/30/2009 4:33:10 PM)

And I'm also wondering JustDark...  were the muslims who threatened the Dutch politicians ever prosecuted?

Or is a threat on someone's life not offensive?




philosophy -> RE: Dutch politician on trial for offensive movie (1/30/2009 10:59:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissSepphora1

And I'm also wondering JustDark...  were the muslims who threatened the Dutch politicians ever prosecuted?

Or is a threat on someone's life not offensive?


...and, i take it, you'd utterly condemn that minority of Christians who also threaten violence to those of other faiths?

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."
 
Ann Coulter




JustDarkness -> RE: Dutch politician on trial for offensive movie (1/31/2009 12:58:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissSepphora1

And I'm also wondering JustDark...  were the muslims who threatened the Dutch politicians ever prosecuted?

Or is a threat on someone's life not offensive?



morning All

The problem here is that when a minority does something they hardly go to jail...they get guidance. They get a personal coach. They get a place to stay and play games...so they are from the street.
Right now they spend an other 80 million euro into the marokkan youth. (sadly I have only a dutch news paper who talks about this..in dutch).
http://frontpage.fok.nl/nieuws/105914/-Vliegende-brigades-tegen-Marokkaanse-reljeugd.html
A good step is..in my opinion..is that the goverment is sick of the parents not taking action. IF that repeats often they are taken out of their parentship and the goverment will put the kids under full guidance.

The ones of the forum have been warned that freedom of speech is not threaten people and not mentioning the holocaust. For the rest nothing is done, besides that the forum owner is afraid is been taken offline.

The extremist group walking around with guns and who killed persons..they were arrested and case is still in court.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125