4u2spoil
Posts: 211
Joined: 5/1/2005 Status: offline
|
For someone who is financially secure, $30 is not "beyond the bounds of all reality." Neither is going to a store, looking at a pair of underwear and getting the same style. If you are just getting by financially, and don't have money for extras I can understand why $30 could be a challenge. Excepting someone who's fallen on hard times, or has hit a temporary rough patch, I prefer not to be involved with someone in that situation. Your cat lady logic fails for several reasons. Financially secure does not equal wealthy. If I wanted someone wealthy, I'd put that down. Actually, if money were my primary motivation I'd put down expectations of net worth, liquid assets and other things to better qualify someone as affluent. Financially secure can be a guy who makes $4,000 a month, and has $500 left over after taking care of his own expenses. Financially insecure could be a guy who makes $400,000 a month, but spends $500,000 and can't manage the $1.2 million in debt. In this instance, $48K/year man is more secure than $4.8 million man. Also, has it ever occurred to you that the cat lady may be happier alone with her feline friends, than suffering fools who try to tell her what expectations she should or shouldn't have for her life? My success and happiness in life is not attached to finding someone to share it with. If I don't, I'd damn sure take time alone (or perhaps with a cat, dog or goldfish) over time with someone who doesn't make me happy. quote:
ORIGINAL: rulemylife Yes, I very much do understand that you are not a "settler". I've met those that won't settle many times before. If they are lucky they find someone who will cater to them, beyond the bounds of all reality. Of course the caterer needs to be wealthy or those that won't settle will never be happy. If they are not lucky, they will become the crazy lady down the street who lives with twenty cats and never leaves the house. Finally, we get to the root of your preference. You're cheap, and don't like other people telling you how to spend your money . To the point of not considering anyone else's preferences, even if your money is spent on them, and avoiding gift giving situations ("but Daddy, I wanted cake and ice cream." "Be happy you got a bag of cookies! Do you know how much cookies cost today?! And Happy Birthday kid, today's your day"). I'm not going to tell you that you'll end up a miserly, lonely old man with a bum wrist, because I don't know that you will. Perhaps you'll find someone who doesn't view your tightwad preferences in the same way that I do, and you'll have a wonderful coupled life, preceded by a lovely BYOB wedding in your backyard. In my opinion, you're a selfish person who's cheap when it comes to others (maybe yourself as well, maybe not). It's not a quality I'm seeking, but if it works for you then more power to you. Don't insult my preferences because they aren't your own and aren't what you seek. quote:
ORIGINAL: rulemylife No, I hate those too. I believe it's rude and pretentious to demand things in the guise of being giving a gift. The key here is your own words, "gift situation". They are gifts. They are not obligations to be fulfilled. If I throw a party, whether it be my wedding, or anything else, I am having the party to celebrate with family and friends, not to be rewarded for throwing the party.
|