NeedToUseYou
Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005 From: None of your business Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: caitlyn Well ... I'm somewhat in the habit of putting that little winky thing at the end of a line, to indicate harmless teasing. <--- (like this one here) BUT ... since you started this ... and mentioned balanced budgets and conservatives: The last Republican President to submit a balanced budget was Eisenhower, who submitted two balanced budgets in his four year administration. Before him, a Republican President had not submitted a balanced budget since Abraham Lincoln was in office. The list of Democratic Presidents that have submitted balanced budgets is long. Just in the last 60 years or so: Clinton - 5 LBJ - 2 Truman - 2 FDR - 6 That's 15 balanced budgets to 2, since the beginning of FDR's three terms. Since the start of the second world war, for every dollar the debt has increased while a Democratic President was in office, it has increased $2.87 with a Republican President in office. If you look at that same time period, with a Republican President and a Republican majority in Congress, the debt has increased $11.23 for every dollar it increased with a Democratic President and Democratic control in Congress. In all fairness, the majority of that gap belongs to just two Republican Presidents, Ronald Reagan and our current President. Our current President has raised the national debt in five years, more than every Democratic President combined, since the founding of our nation. Please forgive me for highjacking this thread, and thank you for your time ... cc I already said just because someone calls themselves a conservative doesn't mean they really are. So, what's your point? Alot of people get elected on false premises. So, why the breakdown of all the economics. When I already said many "conservatives" don't display conservative values. So, your arguing a point I already conceded before your reply. If it is to demonstrate that democrats are truer fiscal conservatives than most republicans, well that's a entirely different discussion, and something I never referenced. Well, that can be argued how exactly they got the balanced budget and what exactly did they do to the tax structure, military, welfare programs, and how sustainable was the policy. Which is a very long-winded discussion. Whichever, my point wasn't entirely directed at you, you were just the last one in the thread that referenced such things that I noticed. Sorry, if you were offended.
|